What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives
-
@Dashrender said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
Hell I wish I could buy a machine without an HD from Dell or HP. then I could put my own SSD in, use the OEM media they should provide (on USB, please!) and install a CLEAN install of windows without their crapware. win WIn WIN!
Well the later you could do. But from what I can tell, there is no cheap way to get driveless machines without going to whiteboxing yourself, which is generally not worth it.
-
The only cost I could see businesses encurring for "drives" is a upgrade cost, from classic winchester drives to SSD's.
This obviously isn't the same use case as described in the Op though.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
@Dashrender said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
Hell I wish I could buy a machine without an HD from Dell or HP. then I could put my own SSD in, use the OEM media they should provide (on USB, please!) and install a CLEAN install of windows without their crapware. win WIn WIN!
Well the later you could do. But from what I can tell, there is no cheap way to get driveless machines without going to whiteboxing yourself, which is generally not worth it.
LOL sure you can always rip out the drive they give you - after you made a restore disk from the on-disk utility (rarely did/do they come with recovery media) But depending on the OEM, that recovery media wasn't MS OEM media, was was a bastardized version from the OEM with their crap slipped in.
But yeah, basically I would love an option to save $50 on the 500 gig drive (OK really probably only saving $20) and use my own SSD, versus paying for their ridiculously overpriced SSD micro selection.
-
But the question is... would anyone find a cost benefit from a solution that removed the need to buy drives?
-
The only place I can think of is maybe a datacenter where drives are being punished... but even then, I've raised the concern that we aren't buying the right drives if they are punished to a point of failure.
-
@BBigford said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
The only place I can think of is maybe a datacenter where drives are being punished... but even then, I've raised the concern that we aren't buying the right drives if they are punished to a point of failure.
Desktops, not servers.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
But the question is... would anyone find a cost benefit from a solution that removed the need to buy drives?
Did the questioner bring forth an answer to this?
-
@Dashrender said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
@scottalanmiller said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
But the question is... would anyone find a cost benefit from a solution that removed the need to buy drives?
Did the questioner bring forth an answer to this?
Yes, but the question is .... is this a solution without a problem? I'm trying to find the problem, does it exist?
-
I replaced most of our old PCs 2 years ago. The average age of our computers is now just over 2 years old. But even those 6 year old PCs rarely had a drive problem, other than sure lack of performance. So I guess today it's the same thing. The new machines deployed two years ago came with and still have HDDs. If they have a problem, they get replaced with a SSD. But as mentioned, it's not a real problem.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
@BBigford said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
The only place I can think of is maybe a datacenter where drives are being punished... but even then, I've raised the concern that we aren't buying the right drives if they are punished to a point of failure.
Desktops, not servers.
Then no...
-
@Dashrender said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
Hell I wish I could buy a machine without an HD from Dell or HP. then I could put my own SSD in, use the OEM media they should provide (on USB, please!) and install a CLEAN install of windows without their crapware. win WIn WIN!
x2
-
-
I've always liked Google's take on the "it broke". It's marked as broken in the management layer and ignored till the entire data center gets a hardware refresh.
-
@travisdh1 said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
I've always liked Google's take on the "it broke". It's marked as broken in the management layer and ignored till the entire data center gets a hardware refresh.
That seems insane... I mean I know there systems are that reliable, but dang.... to just ignore it because it would take "to much" to fix just sounds insane.
-
@DustinB3403 said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
@travisdh1 said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
I've always liked Google's take on the "it broke". It's marked as broken in the management layer and ignored till the entire data center gets a hardware refresh.
That seems insane... I mean I know there systems are that reliable, but dang.... to just ignore it because it would take "to much" to fix just sounds insane.
This might have changed by now. I remember this from when they first publicly released information about their two data centers (yeah, I remember when they were that small.) They were using all white box microATX boards, two per 1u of rack space. No cases, just something for the boards to sit on. It was insanity.
-
I have some pretty old machines in production atm and rarely do i have to replace drives. Maybe two or three a year tops.
-
And when they do fail we just replace the machines, we do not bother with replacing since there are so old.
-
@DustinB3403 said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
@travisdh1 said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
I've always liked Google's take on the "it broke". It's marked as broken in the management layer and ignored till the entire data center gets a hardware refresh.
That seems insane... I mean I know there systems are that reliable, but dang.... to just ignore it because it would take "to much" to fix just sounds insane.
Not as crazy as you might think. Machines fail rarely, machines are cheap, labour is expensive... it can make sense.
-
@travisdh1 said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
@DustinB3403 said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
@travisdh1 said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
I've always liked Google's take on the "it broke". It's marked as broken in the management layer and ignored till the entire data center gets a hardware refresh.
That seems insane... I mean I know there systems are that reliable, but dang.... to just ignore it because it would take "to much" to fix just sounds insane.
This might have changed by now. I remember this from when they first publicly released information about their two data centers (yeah, I remember when they were that small.) They were using all white box microATX boards, two per 1u of rack space. No cases, just something for the boards to sit on. It was insanity.
I know a guy who built systems like that at home.
-
@tiagom said in What If You Didn't Need to Replace Hard Drives:
I have some pretty old machines in production atm and rarely do i have to replace drives. Maybe two or three a year tops.
That's what I've found, it's rare.
