ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Dell OUF366 IP KVM Interface POD

    IT Discussion
    kvm dell pod stystem
    6
    26
    7.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • MattSpellerM
      MattSpeller
      last edited by

      sounds like kvm gear

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • StrongBadS
        StrongBad
        last edited by

        Why is it called an IP interface then, if there is no IP?

        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User @MattSpeller
          last edited by

          @MattSpeller said:

          sounds like kvm gear

          It is but the back of the thing calls it an IP KVM so I though it might put a small java webserever or use a desktop application to get to it, which could be useful. These are trash though.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User @StrongBad
            last edited by

            @StrongBad said:

            Why is it called an IP interface then, if there is no IP?

            I think the KVM switch itself might have a network portion/configuration to it.

            DashrenderD StrongBadS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @A Former User
              last edited by Dashrender

              @thecreativeone91 said:

              @StrongBad said:

              Why is it called an IP interface then, if there is no IP?

              I think the KVM switch itself might have a network portion/configuration to it.

              Exactly!
              You remote into the KVM switch, which uses the CAT5 cable to talk to the cards, which have cables that hang off the back of the servers. Once you're remoted in, you can bring up console screens for all of the attached servers.

              The only IP part is the KVM switch itself.

              This is what you used before iDRAC.

              ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • StrongBadS
                StrongBad @A Former User
                last edited by

                @thecreativeone91 said:

                @StrongBad said:

                Why is it called an IP interface then, if there is no IP?

                I think the KVM switch itself might have a network portion/configuration to it.

                Like to set it up but not to access the KVM itself? Isn't that like having a network server that has an out of band interface but no NIC?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @Dashrender said:

                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                  @StrongBad said:

                  Why is it called an IP interface then, if there is no IP?

                  I think the KVM switch itself might have a network portion/configuration to it.

                  Exactly!
                  You remote into the KVM switch, which uses the CAT5 cable to talk to the cards, which have cables that hang off the back of the servers. Once you're remoted in, you can bring up console screens for all of the attached servers.

                  The only IP part is the KVM switch itself.

                  This is what you used before iDRAC.

                  They aren't old enough to be around before DRAC was. Apparently these were included in a batch of 20 or 30 Dell PE 1950s/2950s that we used to have. Those had DRACs in them though.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    I'm sure they are still in use today. DRAC isn't cheap, these might be less expensive, and therefore still have a market.

                    MattSpellerM scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • MattSpellerM
                      MattSpeller @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said:

                      I'm sure they are still in use today. DRAC isn't cheap, these might be less expensive, and therefore still have a market.

                      You'd be correct, I can name at least 3 companies (all of which I've worked for) that still use them.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        And these devices only cost 1 ethernet port, instead of one per server at the cost of 1 U in a rack. Not a huge savings, but still a savings.

                        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @Dashrender said:

                          I'm sure they are still in use today. DRAC isn't cheap, these might be less expensive, and therefore still have a market.

                          They also lack key features, I assume, like monitoring and power cycling.

                          MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • MattSpellerM
                            MattSpeller @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @Dashrender said:

                            I'm sure they are still in use today. DRAC isn't cheap, these might be less expensive, and therefore still have a market.

                            They also lack key features, I assume, like monitoring and power cycling.

                            Another point against is I've yet to use a PS/2 one that was reliable. This may be due to the age of the gear (ancient) but the USB ones always worked better for me.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @Dashrender said:

                              And these devices only cost 1 ethernet port, instead of one per server at the cost of 1 U in a rack. Not a huge savings, but still a savings.

                              Yeah but you'd need more than one of these anyone for many servers. And cabling direct runs to these from all servers would be annoying when you have a lot of racks.

                              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @A Former User
                                last edited by

                                @thecreativeone91 said:

                                @Dashrender said:

                                And these devices only cost 1 ethernet port, instead of one per server at the cost of 1 U in a rack. Not a huge savings, but still a savings.

                                Yeah but you'd need more than one of these anyone for many servers. And cabling direct runs to these from all servers would be annoying when you have a lot of racks.

                                I'm sure they have high density versions of these - in any case, they are definitely a throwback item from a while ago that is clearly still hanging on.

                                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • ?
                                  A Former User @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  I'm sure they have high density versions of these

                                  That would make it worse as far as cabling with server racks. That's why we have 48 port switches in each server rack.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    Traditional KVMs are cable nightmares. And really, what business puts good management as such a low priority? Even at home I've been on out of band management cards since around 2006 and I was probably late to the game! Once again, companies falling below the home line.

                                    ? DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      Traditional KVMs are cable nightmares. And really, what business puts good management as such a low priority? Even at home I've been on out of band management cards since around 2006 and I was probably late to the game! Once again, companies falling below the home line.

                                      Even our old servers (not running) stored in a vault had remote access cards some are as old as 2001. We had to keep them for 15 year for compliance sadly (the ones that had financial data).

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @A Former User
                                        last edited by

                                        @thecreativeone91 said:

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        Traditional KVMs are cable nightmares. And really, what business puts good management as such a low priority? Even at home I've been on out of band management cards since around 2006 and I was probably late to the game! Once again, companies falling below the home line.

                                        Even our old servers (not running) stored in a vault had remote access cards some are as old as 2001. We had to keep them for 15 year for compliance sadly (the ones that had financial data).

                                        I had all gear made post 2000 with ILO or DRAC or equivalent, even when buying used gear (which was pretty popular to do in the pre-virtualization X86 era) we were making sure everything had out of band management going back to Proliant G1s. Just not worth having a server that lacked that.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Reid CooperR
                                          Reid Cooper
                                          last edited by

                                          Out of band management is awesome. I would be pretty wary of deploying a server that lacked it. The ability to remotely access everything, including the power button, is huge. And that remote might be from the other side of the world or just down the hall. Being able to not walk into the server room for every little thing is a pretty big deal.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Reid CooperR
                                            Reid Cooper
                                            last edited by

                                            And many out of band management solutions give you access to remote CD/DVD drives too. So you can install a hypervisor or operating system or do repairs using a utility without needed to make a physical copy, stand in the server room, work from an old monitor on a shelf....

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post