Possible Refresh for Local Firehouse
-
@handsofqwerty said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
First though would be to get an MFP/Copier under contract.
Secondly why uses ESXi free with so many limitations, if you need free hyper-v is a better option.
Again, it's something we can look into, but we'd have to see.
ESXi free really should not be an option today. I don't know of any scenario, other than a political one where someone internally is not considering the needs of the business, where ESXi is a good choice for a running business (fine for a lab.) Once you drop to the limitations of ESXi Free, XenServer beats it in every way and for people on a tight budget and can't afford backup software HyperV is the choice because while it doesn't do quite everything that XS does, it does more than ESXi plus has the backup API for free.
ESXi is the only "never use" in a free scenario as all of its benefits are gone now. If you are looking at free, ESXi shouldn't be on the consideration list.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
Ok, so we've determined that we can use Hyper-V 2012 R2 for the hypervisor. That's fine. I've got some Hyper-V experience, just not as much as ESXi.
This is why I asked. I just wanted to get some other opinions so I could think of things I hadn't thought of myself.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
Not sure what you mean by the Microserver having no RAID. You can do RAID on a Microserver. You just have a lot fewer drives you can use as opposed to a full-size server, tower or rack-mounted.
By adding a third party RAID card?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
Not sure what you mean by the Microserver having no RAID. You can do RAID on a Microserver. You just have a lot fewer drives you can use as opposed to a full-size server, tower or rack-mounted.
By adding a third party RAID card?
http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=c03004814
That's just one example.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
Not sure what you mean by the Microserver having no RAID. You can do RAID on a Microserver. You just have a lot fewer drives you can use as opposed to a full-size server, tower or rack-mounted.
By adding a third party RAID card?
http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=c03004814
That's just one example.
Oh that's new then. Traditionally the MicroServer has been completely without RAID. Although one has to wonder what the chances are that VMware is going to support this (read: have drivers.)
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
Not sure what you mean by the Microserver having no RAID. You can do RAID on a Microserver. You just have a lot fewer drives you can use as opposed to a full-size server, tower or rack-mounted.
By adding a third party RAID card?
http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=c03004814
That's just one example.
Oh that's new then. Traditionally the MicroServer has been completely without RAID. Although one has to wonder what the chances are that VMware is going to support this (read: have drivers.)
If I go to Hyper-V, then I don't have to worry about VMware and drivers.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
Not sure what you mean by the Microserver having no RAID. You can do RAID on a Microserver. You just have a lot fewer drives you can use as opposed to a full-size server, tower or rack-mounted.
By adding a third party RAID card?
http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=c03004814
That's just one example.
Oh that's new then. Traditionally the MicroServer has been completely without RAID. Although one has to wonder what the chances are that VMware is going to support this (read: have drivers.)
If I go to Hyper-V, then I don't have to worry about VMware and drivers.
Exactly. And you don't have to worry about being limited to hardware RAID either. It's weak Windows Software RAID, but at least there is an option.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
Not sure what you mean by the Microserver having no RAID. You can do RAID on a Microserver. You just have a lot fewer drives you can use as opposed to a full-size server, tower or rack-mounted.
By adding a third party RAID card?
http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=c03004814
That's just one example.
Oh that's new then. Traditionally the MicroServer has been completely without RAID. Although one has to wonder what the chances are that VMware is going to support this (read: have drivers.)
If I go to Hyper-V, then I don't have to worry about VMware and drivers.
Exactly. And you don't have to worry about being limited to hardware RAID either. It's weak Windows Software RAID, but at least there is an option.
Yeah, I think it'd probably be safer to go with the embedded RAID on this one. But that's just me...
-
@scottalanmiller @handsofqwerty
I've been burned by the Windows software "raid" more than once... Nothing beats a good (tested) backup.
-
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller @handsofqwerty
I've been burned by the Windows software "raid" more than once... Nothing beats a good (tested) backup.
Yeah, which is why I want to deploy a Unitrends Free as well.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller @handsofqwerty
I've been burned by the Windows software "raid" more than once... Nothing beats a good (tested) backup.
Yeah, which is why I want to deploy a Unitrends Free as well.
Well that rules our ESXi Free completely then.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller @handsofqwerty
I've been burned by the Windows software "raid" more than once... Nothing beats a good (tested) backup.
Yeah, which is why I want to deploy a Unitrends Free as well.
There's no exclusions in the current beta version.. I don't think I'd be deploying a beta.
-
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller @handsofqwerty
I've been burned by the Windows software "raid" more than once... Nothing beats a good (tested) backup.
Of course, I would never run it myself. Nor it rebranded as Storage Spaces. I can't believe how many people were easily fooled with that rebranded (and also Lync being renamed Skype for Business.) No matter how many times it happens, IT folk are suckers for a non-secret rebrand.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@handsofqwerty said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller @handsofqwerty
I've been burned by the Windows software "raid" more than once... Nothing beats a good (tested) backup.
Yeah, which is why I want to deploy a Unitrends Free as well.
There's no exclusions in the current beta version.. I don't think I'd be deploying a beta.
Why not? For an environment as simple as what theirs' would be, I don't see it causing any issues. If we had some odd system, like an AS/400 or the like, then maybe I'd be more hesitant.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
Why not? For an environment as simple as what theirs' would be, I don't see it causing any issues.
Beta means that even the vendor doesn't think it is safe to use yet.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
If we had some odd system, like an AS/400 or the like, then maybe I'd be more hesitant.
I don't understand how the platform in question for the target of the backups would change the willingness to depend on a non-released product.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@handsofqwerty said:
If we had some odd system, like an AS/400 or the like, then maybe I'd be more hesitant.
I don't understand how the platform in question for the target of the backups would change the willingness to depend on a non-released product.
Because when it's straight Windows, so no Exchange, SQL server, etc, I've never seen Unitrends have any issues, ever. It's usually more likely they have issues with the more peculiar systems, in my experience. They usually work out the most common systems issues earlier in development, from what I've seen. Some products have long-term issues, but it makes sense to make sure that the most common items work first.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
Because when it's straight Windows, so no Exchange, SQL server, etc, I've never seen Unitrends have any issues, ever.
The point is this is a new product and a beta that isn't ready to be used yet. So unless you are comparing this to a long track record of betas and have a good reason why you feel the beta title is not needed - especially since this product doesn't handle anything but HyperV and VMware so even Windows isn't an option. Your point doesn't make logical sense here.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
They usually work out the most common systems issues earlier in development, from what I've seen.
That's what a beta implies. But it also implies that it has not be thoroughly tested yet and you are considering letting a firehouse do that testing. If anything goes wrong you could be in legal trouble as this would easily constitute professional negligence. The beta label is there for a reason. Don't ignore it.
-
@handsofqwerty said:
Some products have long-term issues, but it makes sense to make sure that the most common items work first.
There are only two "features", VMware and HyperV. And people are encountering issues.
