ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Datacenters: Colocation vs. Cloud

    IT Discussion
    datacenter colocation cloud computing
    9
    84
    25.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      So another thread about datacenters got me wondering, a number of years ago when we, as the SMB market primarily, talked about datacenters it was almost exclusively colocation that we talked about. I know that in my world that was certainly the case. Today, datacenter talk is almost exclusively cloud. We used to talk about specific datacenters and racking hardware. Now nearly everything is cloud instances and numerous colocation facilities have been reduced to the selection of EC2, Azure, Rackspace and similar datacenters for VMs.

      For those of you looking at datacenter services, how much of new "purchases" do you look at in the form of colocation and how much in the form of cloud computing / IaaS?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        I know at NTG we have gone to almost 100% Cloud Computing / IaaS and what little colocation we have left is in the process of being phased out. Having dedicated hardware somewhere is a low level of work we are not looking to do, at least not for ourselves. It's not a place where we can add specific value. We make our "money, our value, but providing good services on top. We let someone else be our remote hands at the generic platform level where it is about nothing but basic uptime and reasonable cost - where there are no margins and little value add.

        We hope to be 100% non-colocation by the end of the summer. Not that colocation is bad, there are tons of great cases where it makes loads of sense. But not for us. Our capacity just isn't that large. We get global redundancy and much higher end services going with cloud computing for our needs.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by

          Well.... I'm currently looking at deciding between colocation and IAAS for DR for a company.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Deleted74295D
            Deleted74295 Banned
            last edited by

            There are providers of hosted backup in the US who ship a hard drive for recovery if you need it, far as I know there is nothing like that in the UK.

            So whilst cloud-backups with their zillion features are nice, restore times dictate whether you need a colo.

            ? scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User
              last edited by

              client in question wants access to their data (we live on the gulf coast) in case of a hurricane. So now decide buy hardware to push backups to or rent space to do the same 🙂 Who offers ESXI as a service?

              scottalanmillerS coliverC B 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User @Deleted74295
                last edited by

                @Breffni-Potter said:

                There are providers of hosted backup in the US who ship a hard drive for recovery if you need it, far as I know there is nothing like that in the UK.

                So whilst cloud-backups with their zillion features are nice, restore times dictate whether you need a colo.

                You can get cloud backups with shipping physical disk features. Nothing about being virtual limits that.

                Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
                  last edited by

                  @Breffni-Potter said:

                  So whilst cloud-backups with their zillion features are nice, restore times dictate whether you need a colo.

                  Normally cloud is backed up to the same site for near instant restore and a DR site is another cloud. So the need for shipping drives does not exist in a standard architecture. Always unique cases, of course. But the "intention" of how cloud is used generally eliminates those needs.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @A Former User
                    last edited by

                    @Hubtech said:

                    client in question wants access to their data (we live on the gulf coast) in case of a hurricane. So now decide buy hardware to push backups to or rent space to do the same 🙂 Who offers ESXI as a service?

                    CloudatCost does. One of the few that do this for public cloud (due to high cost, low performance.)

                    But for private cloud, Rackspace does this and few are better for private cloud.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @A Former User
                      last edited by

                      @Hubtech said:

                      Who offers ESXI as a service?

                      For private cloud, NTG would be happy to provide ESX as a service too!

                      @GregoryHall would be the point of contact for that initiative.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • coliverC
                        coliver @A Former User
                        last edited by

                        @Hubtech said:

                        Who offers ESXI as a service?

                        Doesn't VMWare offer ESXi as a service?

                        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ?
                          A Former User @coliver
                          last edited by

                          @coliver said:

                          @Hubtech said:

                          Who offers ESXI as a service?

                          Doesn't VMWare offer ESXi as a service?

                          Nope. They offer Diaster Recovery as a service. at almost $1,000/month minimum.

                          coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @A Former User
                            last edited by

                            @thecreativeone91 Oh... I thought it had more features then that.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User
                              last edited by

                              The thing is ESXi really only makes sense for SMB market due to it's ease of manageability. if you offer it as a service you have the IT knowledge to run it well, where as a SMB has little to no expertise. ESXi also does not scale very well. We have absolutely no ESXi here. Yet we are fully virtualized.

                              Having said that it should be easy to do DR to another Hypervisor if you plan well. or maybe just switch to Xen or XenServer.

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @coliver
                                last edited by

                                @coliver said:

                                @thecreativeone91 Oh... I thought it had more features then that.

                                If they did they would be competing a lot with their customers. I don't think that they want to go there as turning themselves into the sole VMware cloud host would make them a cloud backwater almost overnight.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @A Former User
                                  last edited by

                                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                                  The thing is ESXi really only makes sense for SMB market due to it's ease of manageability.

                                  ESXi as a service is really a SMB-focused product. Which big players like Amazon and Rackspace aren't willing to target.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    I guess I should say if you are offering the service you should have the knowledge. C@C didn't.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • Deleted74295D
                                      Deleted74295 Banned @A Former User
                                      last edited by Deleted74295

                                      @thecreativeone91 said:

                                      You can get cloud backups with shipping physical disk features. Nothing about being virtual limits that.

                                      Whether physical or virtual, I've not found a decent backup vendor in the UK who offers that feature. I need the data on a drive, with a courier, straight away. Unless I've missed someone really obvious.

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      Normally cloud is backed up to the same site for near instant restore and a DR site is another cloud. So the need for shipping drives does not exist in a standard architecture.

                                      Not sure I follow? With a single server and single site which needs a backup, server falls over, on site backups corrupted, time to use the cloud, what happens next?

                                      ? mlnewsM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ?
                                        A Former User @Deleted74295
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        Normally cloud is backed up to the same site for near instant restore and a DR site is another cloud. So the need for shipping drives does not exist in a standard architecture.

                                        Not sure I follow? With a single server and single site which needs a backup, server falls over, on site backups corrupted, time to use the cloud, what happens next?

                                        Well if the server is running in the cloud rather than locally. It has a local Instant recovery backup image at the same DC then the DC's DR site either has a hot version or a backup image at the DR site.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • Deleted74295D
                                          Deleted74295 Banned
                                          last edited by

                                          @thecreativeone91 said:

                                          Well if the server is running in the cloud rather than locally.

                                          Key word being if of course.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • mlnewsM
                                            mlnews @Deleted74295
                                            last edited by

                                            @Breffni-Potter said:

                                            Not sure I follow? With a single server and single site which needs a backup, server falls over, on site backups corrupted, time to use the cloud, what happens next?

                                            With cloud, if things fail, you restore in seconds with another instance unless the ENTIRE site is down. Then you use your DR site. In either case, under normal cloud designs, downtime in minutes and shipping drives is not useful.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 1 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post