Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds
-
@Dashrender said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
Live like it's never going to happen when you bank 2-5 years worth of it, then maybe up your living style - or as you mentioned, use it on some huge capital transaction.
One of my local friend's whos a Sales Rep closed a big deal and I was doing the back of the napkin math to realize he was going to net 70K from the deal. I looked at him and said "Boat?" and he responded "boat house".
The other attitude is some guys in Finance who believe "If you don't live beyond your means a little bit, you'll not stay hungry". Then again, that attitude leads to idiots like this guy who decided naked OTM options on natural gas when winter was coming.
-
@StorageNinja said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
@tonyshowoff said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
Except, again, I'm talking pre-inflation since then. Let me know when they're paying engineers $190K+ because that's what it would be now. It sounds like a lot now because they've kept wages down against inflation.
and again, I'm not talking base wages. The plans are so stock and bonus heavy now that TC is the number that should be compared not wages. Also, I don't know if H1B wages are a good indicator of a "good" median career engineer (Just looking for public data). Now I'd argue the bigger thing is inflation adjustment's kind of a mess because the real estate market there and tax climate has gotten so ridiculous that's the bigger reason TC has to be as high as it is. It's not about wages being held down, it's about local real COL going to the moon.
And there isn't the entire country, even though it likes to think it is. If wages are down nationally against inflation especially, I don't give a damn about extras in the Bay Area, especially if I have to live deep into the East Bay to get by. Prices of living and benefits in Silicon Valley and the Bay are not the end-all-be-all on national wages. If I point out wages are down in Dallas, you can't say "Well, here in San Francisco it's about blah blah blah" and ignore the point I'm not talking about an area so out of control that using at as anything more than a case study is a ridiculous idea.
-
@Dashrender said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
Definitely have a point - but waiting 3 years or more to get your hands on some cash seems boardline crazy risky to me. Those options ideas are likely only for those who can afford to wait on those funds in many cases.
So if you have a 4 year RSU package for 100K, you get 25% of that at 1 year, and each 90 days thereafter 1/12th of it. ESPP ties up your cash for 6 months at a shot and with a lot of plans, you can hit "abort" and get it back with no loss (just time value money loss). Also it's worth noting these type of compensation plans when stacked on even a low six-figure salary that's survivable is what happens. People don't get 400K in RSU's, on a 50K salary.
The only people who have variable compensation plans that look like that are Salespeople who have big OTE (On Target Earnings) salaries that are contingent on hitting thresholds. These sales guys make their real money on accelerators (IE ever $1 past your target of selling your 5 million quota earns you 2x commision, and 3x beyond 200% of quota target). Accelerators can get stupid when sales teams hit "that big one" deal out of the blue (called a bluebird).
But as mentioned - the tax issue and living expense issue has driven these small wages into a real problem.
-
@tonyshowoff said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
If I point out wages are down in Dallas, you can't say "Well, here in San Francisco it's about blah blah blah" and ignore the point I'm not talking about an area so out of control that using at as anything more than a case study is a ridiculous idea.
I live in Houston (Just bought a house in near the heights. I was a hiring manager for a 3 year period and was locally employed for ~7 years in the industry, and consulted all over the state). Wages went up everywhere but the SMB sector. The SMB sector core IT infrastructure and end user support suffers from...
-
Low barrier to entry.
-
Employers having poor ability to value staff (so even if the staff is good, they don't know it, and they will sometimes hire crap staff because again, without a full department and regular hiring of IT staff it's hard to do).
-
Increasingly lower skill overlap with large enterprises (unless said SMB does development or is a technology-focused firm). If IT services were generic and not strategic wages could actually go lower (even without inflation).
-
MSP's offering economy of scale. SaaS vendors offloading the "keeping core applications lights on" and delegating the local staff to increasingly be End User Support.
There is a real secular change to the IT roles in SMB. Some are becoming more an extension of operations and delivering value by being closer to the business. These guys can get 100K. The guys who actually screw with getting GPO to install a printer are becoming a smaller (quantity) and smaller part of the market
I'll note as a market compensation in Houston is a bit odd is tied to rig counts in operation (not the price of the barrel as many mistakenly assume). Dallas and Austin tended to pay a bit less (was a glut of people wanting to live there) while Houston (in good times) and San Antonio tended to offer a better wage to COL ratio in my anecdotal opinion. It's not the 80's and there are other jobs in Houston besides upstream, but it does swing a bit.
-
-
This whole thing is reminding me of Harold Macmillan: "You've never had it so good."
-
@Dashrender said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
@StorageNinja said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
@tonyshowoff said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
Except, again, I'm talking pre-inflation since then. Let me know when they're paying engineers $190K+ because that's what it would be now. It sounds like a lot now because they've kept wages down against inflation.
and again, I'm not talking base wages. The plans are so stock and bonus heavy now that TC is the number that should be compared not wages. Also, I don't know if H1B wages are a good indicator of a "good" median career engineer (Just looking for public data). Now I'd argue the bigger thing is inflation adjustment's kind of a mess because the real estate market there and tax climate has gotten so ridiculous that's the bigger reason TC has to be as high as it is. It's not about wages being held down, it's about local real COL going to the moon.
Definitely have a point - but waiting 3 years or more to get your hands on some cash seems boardline crazy risky to me. Those options ideas are likely only for those who can afford to wait on those funds in many cases.
It's not. For most established professionals, waiting three years to get a lot more money than you'd see otherwise is a no brainer.
-
@Dashrender said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
@StorageNinja said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
The key to variable income is live like you don't need it, and use it for capital purchases that the opex can be controlled.
This is really a giant - duh!
Live like it's never going to happen, when you bank 2-5 years worth of it, then maybe up your living style - or as you mentioned, use it on some huge capital transaction.
A lot of people use it to retire. Work and live on a small salary, bank a huge stock option portfolio, cash out and retire to an island.
-
@StorageNinja said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
@scottalanmiller said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
I did this for my time in a SV firm. Worked from Spain and Panama while on a SV salary.
The real fun is getting them to pay for the travel
They did.
-
@StorageNinja said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
. People don't get 400K in RSU's, on a 50K salary.
Right - so the point is these RSU's and other comps aren't really important for someone making $125K... because if you're lucky you might get another 50% - again if lucky.. and now you're making the same as you were 20 years ago - assuming there were no RSUs 20 years ago for these same people.
The point is an overall comparison. I find it hard to believe that the type of people we are talking about across the country are making more today than they were 20 years ago, when you consider inflation...
I'm making 17% more than I was 10 years ago. According to Google, since 2006, inflation is 21.59%. So i'm making noticeably less than I was making 10 years ago.
-
@Dashrender said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
I'm making 17% more than I was 10 years ago. According to Google, since 2006, inflation is 21.59%. So i'm making noticeably less than I was making 10 years ago.
Almost no one who stays in a single position sees more money over time, it is a super rare company or position that keeps up with inflation.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
@Dashrender said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
I'm making 17% more than I was 10 years ago. According to Google, since 2006, inflation is 21.59%. So i'm making noticeably less than I was making 10 years ago.
Almost no one who stays in a single position sees more money over time, it is a super rare company or position that keeps up with inflation.
Oh sure - I hear ya... and overall I'm not complaining.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
I'm making 17% more than I was 10 years ago. According to Google, since 2006, inflation is 21.59%. So i'm making noticeably less than I was making 10 years ago.
Almost no one who stays in a single position sees more money over time, it is a super rare company or position that keeps up with inflation.
That's a 1.59% annual raise (assuming you started at 100K and ended at 117K).
Note, the Consumer Price Index reports $100 to $116.
So that's basically a net zero raise (note, COL is more than CPI, and it depends on your region this might be more or less).Again, getting back to my comment on SMB IT. There is rarely enough flexibility to move "up" in position in a small shop. If the IT roll provides the same "value" to the business (or less as services or key systems become outsourced), why would pay go up for this position?
-
@Dashrender said in Nine Out of Every 10 Silicon Valley Jobs Pays Less Than In 1997, Report Finds:
Right - so the point is these RSU's and other comps aren't really important for someone making $125K... because if you're lucky you might get another 50% - again if lucky.. and now you're making the same as you were 20 years ago - assuming there were no RSUs 20 years ago for these same people.
It's not really lucky if it's a public company of a major company who has a proven track record.
Looking at some recent offer data.LinkedIn - $250K -400K in RSU's for a Senior Software Engineer for the initial grant.
Boeing - $300K with refreshers of 40KAdditional yearly grant refreshers beyond the initial are all over the place but tied to how much a company wants to keep you but assuming it's 25% of your base salary (not uncommon) with some reasonable stock appreciation you could be looking at close to 300% of initial offer in TC by year 4 which gets back to why I said this article was crap. Wages != Total Compensation in Silicon Valley.
-
Boeing might be screwed these days
