Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
I'd rather increase my lifespan and better my health in other ways, without taking the risks associated with alcohol.
This is the underlying problem... you are prioritizing the risks of alcohol over the overall risks. Your desire to avoid alcohol is greater than your desire to be healthy. You desire to be healthy, but not as much as you desire to not drink.
My desire is to be healthy and to live long, while not developing cancer or disease caused by alcohol, while using other better means to long life and good health from sources better than alcohol.
Stop saying stuff like you are, it's really twisting what I say.
I'm NOT twisting what you say. You literally just repeated what I said that you said and called it twisting when I stated it. But you literally stated it AGAIN. Read what you just wrote carefully.
You want to live long and healthy... of course. If there is a checkbox for live long, you'll check it. If there is one for live healthy, you'll check it. You don't WANT to be sick or dead, no one is claiming you do.
But you then follow that with a caveat.... "while not developing cancer or disease caused by alcohol". This is key because over and over again you state how this is so important to you, that while health and longevity matter, this matters more. And you make a point that it is not cancer or illness that you are worried about, but only or specifically when alcohol is potentially the source.
You are clear that overall health and overall longevity are not the top priority, A priority, but not the top one. The one that comes above overall healthy and longevity, is that alcohol not cause any detriments. Literally, each time you say it, you mention this.
For the rest of us, we care about health and longevity and if we do get sick, we never care about why, only that are overall healthy and longevity is maximized - we don't have caveats where we prioritize the source of what unhealthy bits we end up with.
-
Example... if I'm going to get cancer, I could care less HOW I got it.
As an IT pro, it's not important HOW I reduce my risk, only what the resulting risk is.
-
Here is what we know.... moderate alcohol provides better overall health and longevity versus no alcohol.
Any desire, therefore, to avoid alcohol comes at the expensive of maximizing health. You cannot avoid alcohol with the goal of being healthy, you only avoid it in spite of the desire to be maximally healthy. You can do lots of other healthy things to try to mitigate the damage done by avoiding it, and with enough effort you can certainly do that, but you could do those things AND have proper alcohol for even better benefits.
So avoiding alcohol always comes at a health cost, even if you do "other things" to make it up.
-
I'm making a video to make this easier.
-
-
And now we pause for a brief commercial interruption.
This thread is brought to you by our sponsor. The Arizona Wine Growers Association.
-
-
Humans believed to have evolved from an alcohol consuming branch of the primate tree...
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170222-our-ancestors-were-drinking-alcohol-before-they-were-human
-
My GLH is an alcoholic since it uses E54.
-
@harry-lui said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
My GLH is an alcoholic since it uses E54.
It's a drinker, but it's only an alcoholic if it moves into addiction.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
Humans believed to have evolved from an alcohol consuming branch of the primate tree...
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170222-our-ancestors-were-drinking-alcohol-before-they-were-human
This has been speculation fora long time. Alcohol has been a vital part of our evolution since we split from our ancestors. Many modern anthropologists are positing that it is the entire reason for the agricultural revolution.
-
@coliver said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
Humans believed to have evolved from an alcohol consuming branch of the primate tree...
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170222-our-ancestors-were-drinking-alcohol-before-they-were-human
This has been speculation fora long time. Alcohol has been a vital part of our evolution since we split from our ancestors. Many modern anthropologists are positing that it is the entire reason for the agricultural revolution.
Yup, and likely humans continue to evolve in conjunction with it. It becomes more and more a part of our diet as time goes on.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
Here is what we know.... moderate alcohol provides better overall health and longevity versus no alcohol.
Any desire, therefore, to avoid alcohol comes at the expensive of maximizing health. You cannot avoid alcohol with the goal of being healthy, you only avoid it in spite of the desire to be maximally healthy. You can do lots of other healthy things to try to mitigate the damage done by avoiding it, and with enough effort you can certainly do that, but you could do those things AND have proper alcohol for even better benefits.
So avoiding alcohol always comes at a health cost, even if you do "other things" to make it up.
I'm seeing this through more research, though I have no reason to treat alcohol as the almighty fix-all health drink. Only that it is associated with a longer lifespan and some health benefits.
But so are other things.
-
Therefore, if i want to help my chances of a longer life, I can choose to drink moderate amounts of alcohol... among other choices.
-
I still see it's all about the stress relief moderate drinking provides. Nothing more.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
I still see it's all about the stress relief moderate drinking provides. Nothing more.
That's certainly possible. But there are two important factors here...
- You can't be sure that any substitute activity will provide the same level or type of stress relief.
- The studies may not rule this out, but they don't show this, either. So while you can hypothesize this, that's the end of the utility of it until someone studies that somehow.
Even if that is the reason that drinking alcohol is good for you, it doesn't change the result that it is good for you to do so.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
Therefore, if i want to help my chances of a longer life, I can choose to drink moderate amounts of alcohol... among other choices.
No, that's not how that works. Because, flip it around, if you wanted to die early, you could not drink alcohol, among other choices.
The problem is, is that "being healthy" is not created by picking just one or a few "healthy" practices and then those make up for anything else that you do. Health is created by your overall picture.
Being unhealthy, though, requires only one thing. Like Russian roulette, all by itself, can make you very unhealthy.
You can't do one healthy thing to magically offset one unhealthy thing. The damage from not drinking, in this case, is always there. No matter what "other healthy things" you choose to do, you will still have to accept the impact of not drinking - you'll always be less healthy than you could have been had you not done that one thing.
-
The big thing is that, sadly, healthy is often more subject to your genetics then it is to your environment. We all know people who got cancer even though they ran 10 miles a day and ate nothing but kale/healthy food. Some people are incredibly unhealthy and live till their 90.
-
You are looking at it like this....
Pick Two Healthy Activities In Order To Be Healthy
- Each Lots of Veggies
- Exercise
- Drink Alcohol
And you choosing A&B instead of, A&C, for example. But that is not at all how health works.
In this case the actual decision is like this...
Boolean Value - Choose Yes (Drink Alcohol) to gain +5 to life, or No (Don't Drink Alcohol) to not gain +5 to life.
That's it, that's all that it is. That one decision always carries the penalty (or benefit). The other choices you make, like jogging or having lots of water, stand on their own and while they are part of your overall healthy picture, they don't play into this decision and are red herrings.
Choosing to drink alcohol doesn't determine how long you live, but it does change the chances for how long you live.
-
@tim_g said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
@scottalanmiller said in Red Wine is good for you: Myth busted!:
Here is what we know.... moderate alcohol provides better overall health and longevity versus no alcohol.
Any desire, therefore, to avoid alcohol comes at the expensive of maximizing health. You cannot avoid alcohol with the goal of being healthy, you only avoid it in spite of the desire to be maximally healthy. You can do lots of other healthy things to try to mitigate the damage done by avoiding it, and with enough effort you can certainly do that, but you could do those things AND have proper alcohol for even better benefits.
So avoiding alcohol always comes at a health cost, even if you do "other things" to make it up.
I'm seeing this through more research, though I have no reason to treat alcohol as the almighty fix-all health drink. Only that it is associated with a longer lifespan and some health benefits.
But so are other things.
Right, and that's all that anyone has said. No one is suggesting that there is a panacea, but only that alcohol is one of many choices and one that if you make the wrong decision, you lower your chances for a long and healthy life.
It's always about modifying your "chance for".
Think of D&D. Alcohol doesn't guarantee a good role, but it is a +1 modifier to your Constitution.
