wetting my feet with CM software
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- Salt doesn’t work well with sudo. It requires that the user has NOPASSWD rights for sudo. This basically kills usage on any Ubuntu like distro. The solution is to manually add a special locked user with NOPASSWD rights in sudoers. In fact, giving the standard user NOPASSWD is close to security suicide.
This isn't a standard user, though, so that this is considered bad for standard users isn't applicable here. So that's not a negative.
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- Considering this, instrumentation is a bit more of a trouble in Salt: while Ansible can check with pure shell commands for its platform requirements (and install them), you have to force salt to install those items from a salt-ssh cmd line. It can’t create a state file for instrumentation in the likes of ansible “instrumentation” playbooks.
- This implies that rebuilding an infrastructure is not a one line away with Salt as it is with Ansible, first you need to instrument with salt-ssh, then run environments (cascade of playbooks in Ansible terms). As a side note ansible requires libselinux-python as additional dependency in CentOS 7, while Salt doesn’t.
What do you mean? You'd have Salt built into your base image. So none of this would apply in normal circumstances. Salt would already be installed along with all dependencies before you even start.
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- Basically this means that Salt instrumentation is more cumbersome: while ansible requires you to export your keys and set up the hosts file (Roster in Salt), here you also have to create the user and then manually issue a salt-ssh command system wide, without any target filtering, as you cannot know if you send an apt-get command for instrumentation even to CentOS machines. Really a bad hack, maybe due to my noobness.
None of this has happened when I've used Salt. I'm not sure why you are having these issues. It "just works" when we've used it. No need for dependencies to be met, no user creation, no SSH in from the outside... nothing like that.
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- The relevant thing here is: how can massively create this user from a plain VM not customized at installation time and deployed on N VMs (with N possibly really big)? Maybe a datacenter can customize an iso, but a small company like mine is best server by Ansible like solutions, especially in disaster recovery scenarios, where you have to think fast at a lot of things.
Why would you not have your VM customized? Size doesn't make any difference. Even if you are a one man shop with one server, you would customize your installation distro. We do this just for our lab alone, for example. And we do it on Vultr or Linode. Makes everything much easier and standardized, even if you are not using a tool like Ansible or Salt. In fact, the smaller you are, the more important that efficient processes be used. Big companies can afford to be more lax, and often are.
-
You left out instant commands. Salt can run commands or changes against the environment "instantly", faster than SSH. If something is wrong and you need to push a change or you need to be really tight on the timing of a change, Salt makes this incredibly easy.
-
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- The first thing to consider as now is that Salt is less available than Ansible in distros’ packages. Moreover, being Ansible backed by Red Hat is possible that they will purge Salt as they done with Xen.
What do you mean purge? Xen is still supported by Red Hat and XenServer is still built on it.
I mean that new Rad Hat products have KVM per default and Xen, to my humble opinion, is a second class citizen - at least since Red Hat 7. Of course they support their previous releases, and of course XenServer is built on it, but it is based on the CentOS distro and is supported by the XenServer project (Linux Foundation?) not by direct Red Hat support.
-
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- Salt doesn’t work well with sudo. It requires that the user has NOPASSWD rights for sudo. This basically kills usage on any Ubuntu like distro. The solution is to manually add a special locked user with NOPASSWD rights in sudoers. In fact, giving the standard user NOPASSWD is close to security suicide.
This isn't a standard user, though, so that this is considered bad for standard users isn't applicable here. So that's not a negative.
It is negative in that I've to make adjustements to "plain" installed distros by hand, or at least other configuration tools. Then having a dedicated locked down user is perfectly OK.
-
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- Considering this, instrumentation is a bit more of a trouble in Salt: while Ansible can check with pure shell commands for its platform requirements (and install them), you have to force salt to install those items from a salt-ssh cmd line. It can’t create a state file for instrumentation in the likes of ansible “instrumentation” playbooks.
- This implies that rebuilding an infrastructure is not a one line away with Salt as it is with Ansible, first you need to instrument with salt-ssh, then run environments (cascade of playbooks in Ansible terms). As a side note ansible requires libselinux-python as additional dependency in CentOS 7, while Salt doesn’t.
What do you mean? You'd have Salt built into your base image. So none of this would apply in normal circumstances. Salt would already be installed along with all dependencies before you even start.
that's the point: if you run a standard ISO from canonical or redhat/centos, you have not it installed by any default install: you have to add it and/or preseed the installer (never done this, so I'd have to experiment with this).
-
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
It "just works" when we've used it. No need for dependencies to be met, no user creation, no SSH in from the outside... nothing like tha
if you install the minions everything is resolved by the installer either the boostrap script or the repository you have choosen. What is nice about Ansible if that you just need to apt-get/yum install it on a control machine, then "minions" are there, just add the dependancy installation as very first step in your palybook and ansible "autoinstalls" requirements.
You can do this even with Salt, but you need salt-ssh -r on the command line and then you can execute any state deployment with Salt (either salt-ssh or salt master/minion).
Everything boils down to the fact you have or not an image ready to go with your CM tools. With Ansible you do not need it, you can do on the fly. with Salt you have an intermediate step. To me it is better to run salt-ssh to instrument your target machines, rahter than preseed an image. This is massive do not requires you to poke with isos ad so...
It is just an additional step to remember even when you are in a hurry. just this.
Or, of course, I've missed something. Do not forget I've just started this as a learning project, so exchange here is really appreciated.
-
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- The relevant thing here is: how can massively create this user from a plain VM not customized at installation time and deployed on N VMs (with N possibly really big)? Maybe a datacenter can customize an iso, but a small company like mine is best server by Ansible like solutions, especially in disaster recovery scenarios, where you have to think fast at a lot of things.
Why would you not have your VM customized? Size doesn't make any difference. Even if you are a one man shop with one server, you would customize your installation distro. We do this just for our lab alone, for example. And we do it on Vultr or Linode. Makes everything much easier and standardized, even if you are not using a tool like Ansible or Salt. In fact, the smaller you are, the more important that efficient processes be used. Big companies can afford to be more lax, and often are.
mmm... link please
(OK, after luch I will search for it anyway) -
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- The first thing to consider as now is that Salt is less available than Ansible in distros’ packages. Moreover, being Ansible backed by Red Hat is possible that they will purge Salt as they done with Xen.
What do you mean purge? Xen is still supported by Red Hat and XenServer is still built on it.
I mean that new Rad Hat products have KVM per default and Xen, to my humble opinion, is a second class citizen - at least since Red Hat 7. Of course they support their previous releases, and of course XenServer is built on it, but it is based on the CentOS distro and is supported by the XenServer project (Linux Foundation?) not by direct Red Hat support.
True, but you really don't bring in Salt from Red Hat sources, at least we don't. We use Salt's own tools.
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- Salt doesn’t work well with sudo. It requires that the user has NOPASSWD rights for sudo. This basically kills usage on any Ubuntu like distro. The solution is to manually add a special locked user with NOPASSWD rights in sudoers. In fact, giving the standard user NOPASSWD is close to security suicide.
This isn't a standard user, though, so that this is considered bad for standard users isn't applicable here. So that's not a negative.
It is negative in that I've to make adjustements to "plain" installed distros by hand, or at least other configuration tools. Then having a dedicated locked down user is perfectly OK.
That's considered a basic in any environment, though, whether you are using Ansible or Salt. Just getting your keys in place requires an adjustment to the base install, so Ansible doesn't work without a modified base either.
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- Considering this, instrumentation is a bit more of a trouble in Salt: while Ansible can check with pure shell commands for its platform requirements (and install them), you have to force salt to install those items from a salt-ssh cmd line. It can’t create a state file for instrumentation in the likes of ansible “instrumentation” playbooks.
- This implies that rebuilding an infrastructure is not a one line away with Salt as it is with Ansible, first you need to instrument with salt-ssh, then run environments (cascade of playbooks in Ansible terms). As a side note ansible requires libselinux-python as additional dependency in CentOS 7, while Salt doesn’t.
What do you mean? You'd have Salt built into your base image. So none of this would apply in normal circumstances. Salt would already be installed along with all dependencies before you even start.
that's the point: if you run a standard ISO from canonical or redhat/centos, you have not it installed by any default install: you have to add it and/or preseed the installer (never done this, so I'd have to experiment with this).
Same with Ansible, there is no agent there by default, nor keys for accessing the OS. Neither "just works". Nothing does. And just doing installs from ISO is a lot of effort that isn't needed. That's way more time consuming and complex than doing one install, installing keys for Ansible or the agent for Salt, running updates for security then making an image. Making a new install is seconds after that, instead of a long time. It's worth it, even for a single additional install.
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
To me it is better to run salt-ssh to instrument your target machines, rahter than preseed an image. This is massive do not requires you to poke with isos ad so...
This is where we differ. As someone who never uses the ISOs and always preseeds, I'm unclear what benefit there is from using the ISOs, ever (other than the very first time, obviously.) I want to avoid the ISOs as much as possible, I see them as purely a negative from all aspects. They are slow, risky (because we don't ensure standard security) and cumbersome. Even without CM tools we never used the ISOs. We pre-seeded keys, standard packages, latest updates, etc.
So what's the reason you choose ISOs? What benefit are you seeing from all that extra work?
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
- The relevant thing here is: how can massively create this user from a plain VM not customized at installation time and deployed on N VMs (with N possibly really big)? Maybe a datacenter can customize an iso, but a small company like mine is best server by Ansible like solutions, especially in disaster recovery scenarios, where you have to think fast at a lot of things.
Why would you not have your VM customized? Size doesn't make any difference. Even if you are a one man shop with one server, you would customize your installation distro. We do this just for our lab alone, for example. And we do it on Vultr or Linode. Makes everything much easier and standardized, even if you are not using a tool like Ansible or Salt. In fact, the smaller you are, the more important that efficient processes be used. Big companies can afford to be more lax, and often are.
mmm... link please
(OK, after luch I will search for it anyway)Just back from the grocery now. Link to what exactly? To how we do it on Vultr, for example?
-
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
Same with Ansible, there is no agent there by default, nor keys for accessing the OS. Neither "just works". Nothing does. And just doing installs from ISO is a lot of effort that isn't needed. That's way more time consuming and complex than doing one install, installing keys for Ansible or the agent for Salt, running updates for security then making an image. Making a new install is seconds after that, instead of a long time. It's worth it, even for a single additional install.
mmm... I got it! I prefer to clone plain vanilla rather than rebuild my images (I mean VM images) so that's where my considerations comes from. In this specific case it would mean to add a standard user locked down without password. Therefore it could be rather straight forward to have the user in place and "clone" it as you have not to add different users/passwords.
Still, from a more detailed POW: still do you think that having the agent into the image is better than use the ssh approach? I always end up considering that an ssh is always good as a fallback. I'm comparing here Salt master/minion vs Salt-ssh to make that clear.
-
@scottalanmiller link to direct commands in Salt.
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@scottalanmiller said in wetting my feet with CM software:
Same with Ansible, there is no agent there by default, nor keys for accessing the OS. Neither "just works". Nothing does. And just doing installs from ISO is a lot of effort that isn't needed. That's way more time consuming and complex than doing one install, installing keys for Ansible or the agent for Salt, running updates for security then making an image. Making a new install is seconds after that, instead of a long time. It's worth it, even for a single additional install.
mmm... I got it! I prefer to clone plain vanilla rather than rebuild my images (I mean VM images)
I figured that out... but why? Why leave out the standardization stuff that is where all the power is?
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
Still, from a more detailed POW: still do you think that having the agent into the image is better than use the ssh approach? I always end up considering that an ssh is always good as a fallback. I'm comparing here Salt master/minion vs Salt-ssh to make that clear.
Yes, not having SSH at all I consider the biggest "slam dunk" for Salt. I see needing to SSH into a machine ever as a bit of a failure now. I don't want SSH to even run, let alone be needed.
-
@matteo-nunziati said in wetting my feet with CM software:
@scottalanmiller link to direct commands in Salt.
Still not clear, which commands are you looking for?
