ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XenServer hyperconverged

    IT Discussion
    xenserver xenserver 7 xen orchestra hyperconvergence hyperconverged
    14
    111
    19.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • black3dynamiteB
      black3dynamite @olivier
      last edited by

      @olivier
      Any drawback while using the default storage type LVM?

      olivierO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • olivierO
        olivier @black3dynamite
        last edited by

        @black3dynamite I'm not sure to understand the question.

        So far, the "stack" is:

        • Local Storage in LVM (created during XS install)
        • on top of that, filling it by a big data disk used by a VM
        • the VM will expose this data disk
        • XenServer will mount this data disk and create a file level SR on it
        • VMs will use this SR

        It sounds like a tons of extra layers, but that's the easiest one I found after a lot of tests (you can see it as a compromise between modifying the host too deeply to reduce the layers VS not modifying anything into the host but have more complexity to handle on VM level). You can consider it as an "hybrid" approach.

        Ideally, XenServer could be modified directly to allow this (like VMWare do with VSAN), and expose the configuration via XAPI.

        I think if we (XO project) show the way, it could (maybe) trigger some interest on Citrix side (which is only into XenDesktop/XenApp, but hyperconvergence even make sense here)

        black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • black3dynamiteB
          black3dynamite @olivier
          last edited by black3dynamite

          @olivier
          The question is based on you using EXT (thin) shared storage instead of LVM (thick) for XenServer.

          olivierO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierO
            olivier @black3dynamite
            last edited by

            @black3dynamite I can't use LVM because it's block-based. I can only work with file level backend.

            I did try to play with blocks, performance was also correct (a new layer so a small extra overhead). But I got a big issue in certain cases. Also, it was less scalable in "more than 3" hosts scenario.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • DanpD
              Danp @olivier
              last edited by

              @olivier Sounds promising. Can you elaborate on how adding additional overhead of XOSAN would yield an increase in performance of 40% / 200% ?

              olivierO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierO
                olivier @Danp
                last edited by

                @Danp That's because despite the added layers, we are making some operations locally and also on a SSD (vs the existing NAS where everything is done remotely)

                It's more indicative than a real apple to apple benchmark. The idea here, is to show the system would be usable, performances are not the main objective here.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • olivierO
                  olivier
                  last edited by olivier

                  Blog post available: https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/xenserver-hyperconverged/

                  0_1481105276656_hyperpool.jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • olivierO
                    olivier
                    last edited by

                    I also updated the benchmarks with a Crystal Diskmark working on a 4GiB file (avoiding ZFS cache). Difference of performance is now huge, so the impact of the replication is not that bad at the end.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @olivier
                      last edited by

                      @olivier said in XenServer hyperconverged:

                      I also updated the benchmarks with a Crystal Diskmark working on a 4GiB file (avoiding ZFS cache). Difference of performance is now huge, so the impact of the replication is not that bad at the end.

                      Awesome! This is all very exciting.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • hobbit666H
                        hobbit666
                        last edited by

                        Really looking forward to playing with this

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • vhinzsanchezV
                          vhinzsanchez
                          last edited by vhinzsanchez

                          Just bumping up. Hopefully, Olivier will have some favorable update. 🤤

                          EDIT: corrected olivier...my apologies 😑

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierO
                            olivier
                            last edited by olivier

                            Well, sort of 😉 This command is now working:

                            xe sr-create name-label=XOSAN shared=true content-type=user type=xosan
                            

                            Still a lot of stuff between this and a viable product, I'm in the middle of testing the solution in terms of resilience and overhead. I need also a layer of glue to at least semi-automate the deployment of XOSAN on a pool, otherwise I'll spent to much time doing it manually for each beta tester ^^

                            Anyway, developing a storage on current storage architecture of XenServer is really a pain. Eager to see SMAPIv3 in action 😄

                            vhinzsanchezV 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                            • vhinzsanchezV
                              vhinzsanchez @olivier
                              last edited by

                              Thanks @olivier

                              Just finished reading your blog with response to comment referring to January for beta...I think it's too early in January. Getting excited here just by reading. Nice idea/product, btw.

                              More power!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • olivierO
                                olivier
                                last edited by

                                I still have 27 days to stay in track 😉

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                • olivierO
                                  olivier
                                  last edited by

                                  Just a new blog post talking about Erasure Code solution for XOSAN: https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/xenserver-hyperconverged-with-xosan/

                                  AKA a great solution to mix security, space available and scalability 🙂

                                  Just bought 10GB network stuff to dig on perfs.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                  • FATeknollogeeF
                                    FATeknollogee
                                    last edited by

                                    This is so schweeeeet...
                                    Let's get cracking on the beta testing.....
                                    Where do I sign up, I've got a SuperMicro 2U quad node box waiting & ready 😆

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierO
                                      olivier
                                      last edited by

                                      The setup is still to manual to be open for a "large scale" test.

                                      But tell me more on your setup, I can start to think what's the best mode in your case 😉

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • FATeknollogeeF
                                        FATeknollogee
                                        last edited by

                                        I'll send that to you via email so I don't clutter this thread

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • olivierO
                                          olivier
                                          last edited by

                                          Sure, go ahead.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • olivierO
                                            olivier
                                            last edited by

                                            Article is out (as 5.12): https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/improving-xenserver-storage-performances-with-xosan/

                                            Doc updated: https://xen-orchestra.com/docs/xosan.html

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 3 / 6
                                            • First post
                                              Last post