Web Application VS Windows Application
-
@IT-ADMIN said:
... and the rest is devided btw the 2 VM, one apache 1.5 GB RAM and one for Mysql 1.5 GB RAM, is it fine now ???
That's plenty, yes. Far more than we use for that stuff.
-
-
what makes apache not playing well with mysql if they are on the same server ??
-
-
it takes 1 GB
-
I don't know much about XenServer, but I know you can limit the amount of memory assigned to the Hypervisor (physical host) itself... Not sure where to do that though.
-
-
Ya mine's using close to 2GB
-
anyway it is another discussion about hypervisors we made it 6 months ago,
why it is recomended to make apache and mysql in seperate servers ??
-
@IT-ADMIN said:
anyway it is another discussion about hypervisors we made it 6 months ago,
why it is recomended to make apache and mysql in seperate servers ??
because they compete heavily for physical resources and they scale at different rates
-
ah ok, i see what you mean,
thanks -
@scottalanmiller said:
@IT-ADMIN said:
@coliver no dear, i already tried XenSever, it consume about 700 MB,
Are you sure about that? How did you determine that it was using so much? I've never seen it grab that much.
Default is 752 MiB.
-
@IT-ADMIN said:
what makes apache not playing well with mysql if they are on the same server ??
They play fine, it's you we are trying to alter.
-
@IT-ADMIN said:
it takes 1 GB
Use the free-m command, not a graphical representation. That's not the number that you think that it is.
-
@johnhooks said:
Ya mine's using close to 2GB
Are you sure? I don't think that tool tell syou how much is used.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
Ya mine's using close to 2GB
Are you sure? I don't think that tool tell syou how much is used.
That's the RAM for each VM and the host. 8% is allocated for the dom0. It's not actually using that much, but that much is allocated by default, bad wording.
-
@wirestyle22 said:
@IT-ADMIN said:
anyway it is another discussion about hypervisors we made it 6 months ago,
why it is recomended to make apache and mysql in seperate servers ??
because they compete heavily for physical resources and they scale at different rates
No, that's not an issue. Specifically the issue is the potential to write code that relies on locality.
-
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
Ya mine's using close to 2GB
Are you sure? I don't think that tool tell syou how much is used.
That's the RAM for each VM and the host. 8% is allocated for the dom0.
I mean, didi you run free to see what was REALLY used?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
Ya mine's using close to 2GB
Are you sure? I don't think that tool tell syou how much is used.
That's the RAM for each VM and the host. 8% is allocated for the dom0.
I mean, didi you run free to see what was REALLY used?
Used is like 702, I changed the response above.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@IT-ADMIN said:
what makes apache not playing well with mysql if they are on the same server ??
They play fine, it's you we are trying to alter.
Q: Is this assuming he has a rather large server to expand into? The differing rates can be a big problem, no? I always looked at VM's as a means to make system resources more economical.
