Switching to the Nylas N1 Email Client
-
@anonymous I got the windows N1 client to connect to our locally installed Exchange Server
-
@brianlittlejohn Then your not using a local sync engine
-
The open-source Nylas Sync Engine does not support Exchange, but the hosted version does.
-
@anonymous Ok, so If I just download the client, it uses their hosted sync agent to talk to my exchange server, then push it back down to the n1 client?
-
I'm still trying to understand what sucks so much about Outlook. confused
The lack of tags instead of folders seems to be the biggest thing.
-
@brianlittlejohn That's correct. You now have a middle man, who could is theory read your mail.
-
@Dashrender You have to install it.
We need a web client that has all the same features as outlook that is free and open source.
-
@Dashrender also, remember that @scottalanmiller is a full time linux using now
-
@Dashrender I'm just looking for an Outlook replacement for Linux. I use outlook as my everyday client.
-
@anonymous said:
@brianlittlejohn That's correct. You now have a middle man, who could is theory read your mail.
I'm using O365, I'm not really interested in having yet another possible middle man reading my email.
-
@anonymous said:
@brianlittlejohn sadly you can't self host exchange
You can, it's very common. Not advised, but extremely common. Nearly every business still does this. In SW I'd say it is like 80% of companies.
-
@anonymous said:
@coliver I mean on N1
You can't? I've not looked into it, but they call the feature Exchange, not Office 365. It should see self hosted the same as it sees O365.
-
@anonymous said:
The open-source Nylas Sync Engine does not support Exchange, but the hosted version does.
OH, now I see. They probably don't have an open source Active Sync connector.
-
@anonymous said:
@Dashrender You have to install it.
We need a web client that has all the same features as outlook that is free and open source.
Not sure I agree.
Frankly I'm surprised that Scott is doing this other than to know about another product. Why lock yourself down to a non mobile client for email access?
I've been using a web based email client personally for over a decade, I personally purchased a domain name and subscribed to O365 SMB account because I like OWA better than my old client.
So I'm paying around $8/month for my email (when I include the cost the domain name).
-
@brianlittlejohn said:
@Dashrender I'm just looking for an Outlook replacement for Linux. I use outlook as my everyday client.
N1 seems pretty good. Super easy and very attractive.
-
@Dashrender said:
@anonymous said:
@Dashrender You have to install it.
We need a web client that has all the same features as outlook that is free and open source.
Not sure I agree.
Frankly I'm surprised that Scott is doing this other than to know about another product. Why lock yourself down to a non mobile client for email access?
I've been using a web based email client personally for over a decade, I personally purchased a domain name and subscribed to O365 SMB account because I like OWA better than my old client.
So I'm paying around $8/month for my email (when I include the cost the domain name).
I don't like OWA either. I like it more than Outlook, sure, but that's a low bar. Having a good email client would be nice.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
@anonymous said:
@Dashrender You have to install it.
We need a web client that has all the same features as outlook that is free and open source.
Not sure I agree.
Frankly I'm surprised that Scott is doing this other than to know about another product. Why lock yourself down to a non mobile client for email access?
I've been using a web based email client personally for over a decade, I personally purchased a domain name and subscribed to O365 SMB account because I like OWA better than my old client.
So I'm paying around $8/month for my email (when I include the cost the domain name).
I don't like OWA either. I like it more than Outlook, sure, but that's a low bar. Having a good email client would be nice.
Sure, whatever it is about Outlook/OWA that you don't like, but moving to a local email client? Maybe it doesn't really matter. Why doesn't it matter? Because you are using a local client on your phone, your iPad, etc - so assuming you have no need to use a computer that doesn't belong to you to check your email, there is no reason for you to be truly mobile webmail, of course that said, since you're using O365, you'd still have the option in a pinch if you needed it.
OK, I get it now, as much as I can considering I like Outlook
-
I guess my biggest concern with an app like this is that they have access to my email... I guess I'm not comfortable with yet another company potentially having access to my email.
-
I can see where people would not like people having access to their email, but one we accept that tons of companies we don't trust (ISP, NSA) do have access to it and have no accountability that having companies we do trust (Microsoft, Nylas) have access when they do have accountability doesn't really seem to matter.
Do I like people having access to my email? Not really. Do I care? Not much. It's so much better than what is already happening to my email that I don't see it as worth really thinking about.
-
@scottalanmiller So your saying that SSL is broken?
