ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Local website purchase SSL or self signed?

    IT Discussion
    iis
    9
    49
    9.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      coliver @JaredBusch
      last edited by

      @JaredBusch said:

      @scottalanmiller is most certainly right here. There is nothing security related here. it is all good marketing allowing cert providers to charge more money for something no one cares about and does zero for security.

      Agreed 100%. There is zero benefit to having the more expensive certification from a technical standpoint. Probably also zero from a marketing and reputation standpoint.

      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • S
        scottalanmiller @coliver
        last edited by

        @coliver said:

        @JaredBusch said:

        @scottalanmiller is most certainly right here. There is nothing security related here. it is all good marketing allowing cert providers to charge more money for something no one cares about and does zero for security.

        Agreed 100%. There is zero benefit to having the more expensive certification from a technical standpoint. Probably also zero from a marketing and reputation standpoint.

        That would be my guess. I can't see a company touting this in a useful way. How would you present it?

        "We spent more on our SSL cert than our competitor."

        Customers would say "What's an SSL cert and why are you wasting money on a more expensive one?"

        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C
          coliver @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @coliver said:

          @JaredBusch said:

          @scottalanmiller is most certainly right here. There is nothing security related here. it is all good marketing allowing cert providers to charge more money for something no one cares about and does zero for security.

          Agreed 100%. There is zero benefit to having the more expensive certification from a technical standpoint. Probably also zero from a marketing and reputation standpoint.

          That would be my guess. I can't see a company touting this in a useful way. How would you present it?

          "We spent more on our SSL cert than our competitor."

          Customers would say "What's an SSL cert and why are you wasting money on a more expensive one?"

          Not even customers... how would you present this to shareholders? "We spent money on something that has no proven track record of being more secure or more marketable then the cheaper option." Doesn't make sense to me.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • S
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Well, thankfully minutia like SSL Certs is rarely presented to shareholders 🙂

            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C
              coliver @scottalanmiller
              last edited by coliver

              @scottalanmiller said:

              Well, thankfully minutia like SSL Certs is rarely presented to shareholders 🙂

              Right... I'm not even sure how much more expensive it is... just seems like it would be one of those... "If they are wasting money on that, what else are they wasting money on?" Situations.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                Dashrender
                last edited by

                Yet many banks and Paypal, eBay, etc all use the EV cert.

                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  JaredBusch @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @Dashrender said:

                  Yet many banks and Paypal, eBay, etc all use the EV cert.

                  many people use SAN also. The point is the marketing worked. Not that the solution is correct.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • D
                    Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    uh.. Isn't SAN a different situation altogether?

                    J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      JaredBusch @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said:

                      uh.. Isn't SAN a different situation altogether?

                      No. Both are a waste of money with little true value and hyped or marketed heavily as a good thing.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • 1
                      • 2
                      • 3
                      • 3 / 3
                      • First post
                        Last post