BackUp device for local or colo storage
-
Oh I excluded it mistakenly, the full backup by my estimates, performed weekly (and held for a month) would total ~24 TB of space. (rounded for drive sizes)
-
Am I correct in understanding that there is no other backups software solution that will create incrementals? That should solve your 30 Mb pipe problem.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
Oh I excluded it mistakenly, the full backup by my estimates, performed weekly (and held for a month) would total ~24 TB of space. (rounded for drive sizes)
Because you don't have incremental technology, right?
Assuming there isn't a third party solution that provides incremental, I wonder if going with Hyper-V would have been better for you and use a backup that provides incremental backups.
The end result would be nearly the same, and sounds like it would actually be better.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
Is this realistic to even pursue an Off-site backup solution?
Tape. That's how everyone tackles that.
-
We currently have Storage Craft for the incremental backups as well as Root directory backups.
We would likely continue using it for incrementals. But performing the fulls is what has me the most concerned.
(good point, forgot to add it)
-
@DustinB3403 said:
Oh I excluded it mistakenly, the full backup by my estimates, performed weekly (and held for a month) would total ~24 TB of space. (rounded for drive sizes)
What is the delta rate? That is the most important number.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Is this realistic to even pursue an Off-site backup solution?
Tape. That's how everyone tackles that.
Would tape still address the length of time it would take to create the full?
I can't imagine it would. This isn't for archival but recovery in IT Disaster.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Oh I excluded it mistakenly, the full backup by my estimates, performed weekly (and held for a month) would total ~24 TB of space. (rounded for drive sizes)
What is the delta rate? That is the most important number.
I'm uncertain of how to find out. Any recommendations?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Oh I excluded it mistakenly, the full backup by my estimates, performed weekly (and held for a month) would total ~24 TB of space. (rounded for drive sizes)
What is the delta rate? That is the most important number.
Exactly, if you go incrementals, can't StorageCraft sync via the WAN to another server? Why bother with the fulls?
-
@DustinB3403 said:
Would tape still address the length of time it would take to create the full?
It only takes a few minutes to write 24GB to tape.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Would tape still address the length of time it would take to create the full?
It only takes a few minutes to write 24GB to tape.
Terabyte. Not gigiabytes.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
I'm uncertain of how to find out. Any recommendations?
It has to be measured. You need to see how big incrementals are.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Would tape still address the length of time it would take to create the full?
It only takes a few minutes to write 24GB to tape.
Terabyte. Not gigabytes.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Would tape still address the length of time it would take to create the full?
It only takes a few minutes to write 24GB to tape.
Terabyte. Not gigiabytes.
That's what I meant. Tape is fast, very fast.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Would tape still address the length of time it would take to create the full?
It only takes a few minutes to write 24GB to tape.
Terabyte. Not gigiabytes.
That's what I meant. Tape is fast, very fast.
And how would that operate for off-site? Wouldn't someone have to site there changing tapes in and out?
-
@DustinB3403 said:
And how would that operate for off-site? Wouldn't someone have to site there changing tapes in and out?
No, you change the tapes locally. You DRIVE the tapes to the offsite. The entire point is to bypass the WAN. Anything using the WAN is going to be a non-option.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Would tape still address the length of time it would take to create the full?
It only takes a few minutes to write 24GB to tape.
Terabyte. Not gigiabytes.
That's what I meant. Tape is fast, very fast.
And how would that operate for off-site? Wouldn't someone have to site there changing tapes in and out?
I assume you would find a tape solution that holds a single full backup. Then you just swap the single tape. You said you only do it weekly, so that would be four tapes a month, and someone would have to bring them to the offsite location.
-
So a local tape solution, carried off weekly.
They can't be much heavier than the 22lbs box I take home weekly...
-
@DustinB3403 said:
So a local tape solution, carried off weekly.
They can't be much heavier than the 22lbs box I take home weekly...
Right, like far less than a pound
-
Wouldn't you carry off daily?
