Lenovo Ushers in a New Era of Mobile Workstation Power and Performance with Lenovo ThinkPad P50 and P70
-
Wow. Just.... wow. That anyone is willing to do business with them anymore is mind boggling to me. What would entice someone to let their salesman in the door? The lengths that they will go to are unthinkable.
-
i like my lenovo laptop....
-
From that link:
"That turns out to be a method Microsoft introduced with Windows 8 to allow the BIOS to execute code on boot up (!?!) called "Windows Platform Binary Table (WPBT)""Isn't that the whole reason UEFI exists, so we can't have that happen?
-
@hubtechagain I have a Lenovo that I got for free, however it has Linux on it so I think I'm ok?
-
@johnhooks said:
Isn't that the whole reason UEFI exists, so we can't have that happen?
No, UEFI exists to promote Windows lock in.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
Isn't that the whole reason UEFI exists, so we can't have that happen?
No, UEFI exists to promote Windows lock in.
I guess I should rephrase that, wasn't that the proposed reason, so only verified code could run?
-
@johnhooks said:
@hubtechagain I have a Lenovo that I got for free, however it has Linux on it so I think I'm ok?
We got one for free, I'm not impressed with it at all. I'm surprised that they decided to give something away that would not be impressive. So as a Lenovo owner I'm like "even for free, we aren't happy". Nothing is less impressive than only being marginally useful for free.
-
@johnhooks said:
I guess I should rephrase that, wasn't that the proposed reason, so only verified code could run?
Yes, Microsoft verified code, not code for you. It's basically designed to promote malware that someone has paid the vendors to approve.
-
@scottalanmiller Oh ok, I guess that makes sense. I never realized it had to be verified by them, but now that I think of it, who else could verify it?
-
So how can we load Linux on through UEFI? They just allow it for now?
-
@johnhooks said:
@scottalanmiller Oh ok, I guess that makes sense. I never realized it had to be verified by them, but now that I think of it, who else could verify it?
"Verified" is one of those tricky marketing words that sounds great and you can get people to say "of course we want that" when, in fact, it is generally a potentially very bad thing.
-
@johnhooks said:
So how can we load Linux on through UEFI? They just allow it for now?
Linux itself isn't a thing. Some OSes are verified, some are not. UEFI can be made to be controlled by the user, sometimes not.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
So how can we load Linux on through UEFI? They just allow it for now?
Linux itself isn't a thing. Some OSes are verified, some are not. UEFI can be made to be controlled by the user, sometimes not.
Oh ok.
-
UEFI makes things really complex
-
Who do you use? I have an ASUS and it's been fine so far. I wondered if it's worth it to get something like a System76?
-
I haven't built a system in over a decade
-
So I've been thinking. Who's the bigger devil out of this mess, Lenovo who was using a channel that was given to them (which lets face it, most people would do - not all but most) or Microsoft for giving them the ability?
This is in reference to the pre Windows executed code, not superfish.
-
@johnhooks said:
So I've been thinking. Who's the bigger devil out of this mess, Lenovo who was using a channel that was given to them (which lets face it, most people would do - not all but most) or Microsoft for giving them the ability?
This is in reference to the pre Windows executed code, not superfish.
Lenovo is my feeling. Not to get into that debate (because I think agree with how this sounds) but you don't blame the gun, you blame the person who wields it. There are tons and tons of ways to be harmed out there and we can't rely on people not making weapons or tools that can be used as weapons but on the criminals who see an opportunity to do harm and leverage it.
-
For example.... do we blame the creators of C for making a programming language? Or do we blame the person who actually wrote a Trojan and used it to do something bad?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@johnhooks said:
So I've been thinking. Who's the bigger devil out of this mess, Lenovo who was using a channel that was given to them (which lets face it, most people would do - not all but most) or Microsoft for giving them the ability?
This is in reference to the pre Windows executed code, not superfish.
Lenovo is my feeling. Not to get into that debate (because I think agree with how this sounds) but you don't blame the gun, you blame the person who wields it. There are tons and tons of ways to be harmed out there and we can't rely on people not making weapons or tools that can be used as weapons but on the criminals who see an opportunity to do harm and leverage it.
When you put it that way with the guns, I agree.
