USB Thumb Drive vs USB Hard Drive
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@g.jacobse said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
USB Thumb Drives are fine for Live images, but keep in mind a lot of them have slow speeds even though they are flash based they are designed for low performance low usage storage. You could just pick up a USB SSD and not have to worry about the speeds or the writes.
I could - yet it defeats the "ease of carry' as a SSD doesn't fit on my key chain.
Huh? an SSD doesn't imply a 2.5" drive. http://www.amazon.com/VisionTek-120GB-Pocket-Drive-900718/dp/B00O0NV5HU
Nice find - however it's still in the 'Large' column I would worry it would get snagged and subsequently damage done to it or to the USB port.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@g.jacobse said:
On the LIVE version I can install software, I'll install Unetbootin, Sysstat, and a few others. However, shut down restart (moving to different computer, or being a week later) they are not there.
Not sure what you mean. Shutdown and restart are missing? You shouldn't need them but if you want them, just install them like anything else.
What he is stalking about is if he uses apt-get to install say... iotop, gparted, and other tools that aren't installed by default... and he shuts down the live system and takes it to another computer, when he boots it up, he has to re-install all the software again -- even though he is running on a USB drive.
-
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@g.jacobse said:
On the LIVE version I can install software, I'll install Unetbootin, Sysstat, and a few others. However, shut down restart (moving to different computer, or being a week later) they are not there.
Not sure what you mean. Shutdown and restart are missing? You shouldn't need them but if you want them, just install them like anything else.
What he is stalking about is if he uses apt-get to install say... iotop, gparted, and other tools that aren't installed by default... and he shuts down the live system and takes it to another computer, when he boots it up, he has to re-install all the software again -- even though he is running on a USB drive.
Yes - apologies, I've gone back and edited it in an attempt to clarify things.
-
I don't understand the problem - are you really worried about wearing out a cheap disposable item? or is it data loss?
$0.02 - go buy yourself a 5 pack of horrid knock offs (or 2 really nice USB3.0 ones, treat yo self!)
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
Huh? an SSD doesn't imply a 2.5" drive. http://www.amazon.com/VisionTek-120GB-Pocket-Drive-900718/dp/B00O0NV5HU
Holy Shit. That is one expensive drive.....
http://www.amazon.com/PNY-Turbo-128GB-Flash-Drive/dp/B00FE2N1WS/
-
@anonymous said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
Huh? an SSD doesn't imply a 2.5" drive. http://www.amazon.com/VisionTek-120GB-Pocket-Drive-900718/dp/B00O0NV5HU
Holy Shit. That is one expensive drive.....
http://www.amazon.com/PNY-Turbo-128GB-Flash-Drive/dp/B00FE2N1WS/
It's not expensive it's an SSD. The one you linked to is not an SSD, just a normal flash Drive.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
It's not expensive it's an SSD. The one you linked to is not an SSD, just a normal flash Drive.
Yup, gotta pay for that controller & all the various and sundry bits (like wear levelling)
-
It sounds like you are dealing with the same thing I am now - wanting to have a little USB toolbox that you can use on a variety of computers with your favorite diagnostic/cleaning/whatever applications. With that in mind, I discovered that Live USB is much better for this setup as the full install makes your USB Linux dependent on the hardware you initially installed it on.
Creating a persistent drive on the USB seems to work well for storing files, but as you say it's trickier to keep installed applications between sessions.
I'm wondering if there are workarounds, like portable versions of apps that don't depend upon an installation. It might also be possible/worthwhile to store the installation files on the drive and have a shell script to install all your programs from the local repo?
This isn't so much of an answer as it is me saying "I have the same question" but I hope it helps
-
@WingCreative With the intertubes connected it's not really a big deal (drivers). Unless you work on some hairy old stuff I doubt you'll have any issues.
-
@MattSpeller said:
@WingCreative With the intertubes connected it's not really a big deal (drivers). Unless you work on some hairy old stuff I doubt you'll have any issues.
True, I suppose my specific scenario where I was testing this was pretty rare - On my desktop I use a USB WiFi adapter from before I knew I would get into Linux that only has Windows Drivers, so I need to install the software that lets me use those Windows drivers and have them on the USB stick before I can access the internet. It's dumb.
I could also see this setup coming in handy if you were working on an infected machine where you don't necessarily want it to be connected to the internet, but then again if you're booting into a live USB session to check it out that shouldn't affect you too much so maybe not.
-
@WingCreative said:
On my desktop I use a USB WiFi adapter
Yeah that'd do it haha
I could also see this setup coming in handy if you were working on an infected machine where you don't necessarily want it to be connected to the internet, but then again if you're booting into a live USB session to check it out that shouldn't affect you too much so maybe not.
I still prefer a live CD for that specific scenario but heck yeah it'd work.
-
@MattSpeller said:
@WingCreative With the intertubes connected it's not really a big deal (drivers). Unless you work on some hairy old stuff I doubt you'll have any issues.
I've rarely had an issue taking a Linux HDD out of a computer and tossing it in another. Sometimes you need to modify the Drive list or w/e it's called to get it to boot.
-
@thecreativeone91 Ditto, though I recall one particular intel chipset (945? low end P4 skt468/775) that would consistently barf when this was attempted.
