How Should the Job Postings Section Function
-
Also, and this is huge, it appears that the goals of the OP are to get people to look at the posting, correct? But if there is no active discussion on it, the posting will effectively disappear in a day or two. So having a controversial or interesting job discussion is actually, by far, the best way to get eyeballs on it. Without active discussion, job postings in a discussion forum are very hard to find.
-
@JaredBusch said:
If you want to provide feedback, make a discussion thread in the discussion forums about it. Keep the discussion on the job posting itself relevant to the posting. Such as a clarification on something.
That's a valid approach, potentially. It would be really nice if we had a thread splitting option to take those discussions to a new thread.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Also, and this is huge, it appears that the goals of the OP are to get people to look at the posting, correct? But if there is no active discussion on it, the posting will effectively disappear in a day or two. So having a controversial or interesting job discussion is actually, by far, the best way to get eyeballs on it. Without active discussion, job postings in a discussion forum are very hard to find.
I don't agree with that. It isn't like posting a thread in IT discussion or Water Cooler. Those effectively disappear, but there aren't many job postings so those stay relatively visible. If your intention is looking for a job, you would go into the job posting section and see what is available. If you see a listing that is a few weeks old, you could comment or PM the original poster and ask if it's still available.
-
Do we have rules specific to the job posting section? If not, we probably should. Maybe any and all discussion should be limited to simply yes/no questions about the specific job in question.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
I don't know seems like people just like to argue on here more than anything anymore.
In some regard that may have some merit. However as Scott pointed out, that is part of the value.
In the realm of IT, and really so many others we get to a point in processing a task that we just do that task the way we have always done it. Or the way our former staff members always performed it. Building a new desktop was you always needed the CD/DVD to install it. You had to do this before that, and so forth.
But someone came along and found a new way to deploy it. It was fresh, new, and risky.. at least until it wasn't. But I wager that when that person changed jobs and went to do an 'image' build that the people around him/her were like; "No, we have always done it this way"...
You can prove a point with a 'constructive' argument. I've always used the GUI to configure this or that,. but I've learned that the CLI is better. While I'm still learning the CLI I'm sure that there are scripts that run better and so on and so on....
I think some limited responses should be allowed. Is it possible to Force Moderate the Jobs Section?
@art_of_shred said:
Do we have rules specific to the job posting section? If not, we probably should. Maybe any and all discussion should be limited to simply yes/no questions about the specific job in question.
I agree. Certain rules to keep on topic might be needed.
-
I have been following this a bit and I think we will need to add some rules for the Job Posting Section. I will discuss with my community management team today and let you know about any changes.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@JaredBusch said:
If you want to provide feedback, make a discussion thread in the discussion forums about it. Keep the discussion on the job posting itself relevant to the posting. Such as a clarification on something.
That's a valid approach, potentially. It would be really nice if we had a thread splitting option to take those discussions to a new thread.
This would only be good as long as there is a link to that discussion thread very high up in the Job posting thread so people can see there is discussion going on regarding this posting.
-
@IRJ said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Also, and this is huge, it appears that the goals of the OP are to get people to look at the posting, correct? But if there is no active discussion on it, the posting will effectively disappear in a day or two. So having a controversial or interesting job discussion is actually, by far, the best way to get eyeballs on it. Without active discussion, job postings in a discussion forum are very hard to find.
I don't agree with that. It isn't like posting a thread in IT discussion or Water Cooler. Those effectively disappear, but there aren't many job postings so those stay relatively visible. If your intention is looking for a job, you would go into the job posting section and see what is available. If you see a listing that is a few weeks old, you could comment or PM the original poster and ask if it's still available.
Okay, that makes sense. If you are looking only for the people looking for a job and not those looking for it to pop up and being something that they look at even when not looking. Right now while there is little job posting traffic, that works.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@JaredBusch said:
If you want to provide feedback, make a discussion thread in the discussion forums about it. Keep the discussion on the job posting itself relevant to the posting. Such as a clarification on something.
That's a valid approach, potentially. It would be really nice if we had a thread splitting option to take those discussions to a new thread.
This would only be good as long as there is a link to that discussion thread very high up in the Job posting thread so people can see there is discussion going on regarding this posting.
That's easy to do. Just make a post that says that there is a continuing discussion prompted from but not actually about the post itself and provide a link to it.
-
@art_of_shred said:
Do we have rules specific to the job posting section? If not, we probably should. Maybe any and all discussion should be limited to simply yes/no questions about the specific job in question.
No, that's really why I was asking. It's always just been another part of the discussion forum. That some people felt that it should be treated with kit gloves rather than open to normal discussion was surprising, to me.
-
Alternative to moderation:
Single posts allowed in the Jobs Posting, but then a discussion thread can be created that is linked back to the OP for 'bantering'. Keeping the Jobs Posting limited to single messages only. -
@scottalanmiller said:
@art_of_shred said:
Do we have rules specific to the job posting section? If not, we probably should. Maybe any and all discussion should be limited to simply yes/no questions about the specific job in question.
No, that's really why I was asking. It's always just been another part of the discussion forum. That some people felt that it should be treated with kit gloves rather than open to normal discussion was surprising, to me.
I can understand why it might be best left to just the posting and detail-oriented questions. When everyone starts knocking the posting, it loses credibility in general, as I think @IRJ was saying. I agree with you that the discussion was warranted, but maybe it should have been linked to an actual discussion topic elsewhere and not cluttering up a specific job posting. Really, I am agreeing with just about everyone's points. Nothing wrong with discussing, but do it in the right place. If you disrespect my wife, we should take it outside, and not trash the restaurant.
-
@g.jacobse said:
Alternative to moderation:
Single posts allowed in the Jobs Posting, but then a discussion thread can be created that is linked back to the OP for 'bantering'. Keeping the Jobs Posting limited to single messages only.So then the downside there, of course, is that things that are super common like "What is the location?", "What is the payscale?", "What is the actual job?" would be lost. Is that something that we want? That most potential posters would want? Maybe, maybe not.
-
Read the post by @art_of_shred . It isn't too hard to know the difference between a relevant question and discussion that could be considered negative. I think different rules should be posted and it should be moderated according to those rules. I don't see it as something that is going to need much or any extra moderation if the rules are clearly laid out.
-
Questions related to the job posting such as What is the pay scale etc. would of course be allowed. No Discussion should be though.
-
@IRJ said:
Read the post by @art_of_shred . It isn't too hard to know the difference between a relevant question and discussion that could be considered negative. I think different rules should be posted and it should be moderated according to those rules. I don't see it as something that is going to need much or any extra moderation if the rules are clearly laid out.
I agree. It just needs clarification.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@g.jacobse said:
Alternative to moderation:
Single posts allowed in the Jobs Posting, but then a discussion thread can be created that is linked back to the OP for 'bantering'. Keeping the Jobs Posting limited to single messages only.So then the downside there, of course, is that things that are super common like "What is the location?", "What is the payscale?", "What is the actual job?" would be lost. Is that something that we want? That most potential posters would want? Maybe, maybe not.
No - you are quite correct. Those questions should be with the OP, there is no logical reason why those details should be separated from the OP.
But is that not why we are having a discussion about it?
