ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Did SourceForge start re-integrating adware into their downloads again?

    Water Closet
    7
    32
    10.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • R
      Rob Dunn
      last edited by

      What the hell, SourceForge? I go to download FileZilla and Vipre kills it because you've packed in a bunch of adware/toolbar stupidness into your downloads again. I thought we talked about this already.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • D
        Deleted74295 Banned
        last edited by

        What? They stopped doing that? Surprised they stopped at all.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • R
          Rob Dunn
          last edited by

          It seemed like it was ok for awhile, but maybe they'd never changed...? Or maybe they do that with their most popular downloads? I don't know - it just seemed like I didn't notice it until the other day...but then again, I don't download from there terribly often.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            I thought that it was okay for a while too.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User
              last edited by

              Yeah it's annoying but to be fair

              There's a less obivous download without them. https://filezilla-project.org/download.php?type=client And click show more download options which allows you do download the version without the SF install wrapper. http://sourceforge.net/projects/filezilla/files/FileZilla_Client/3.10.3/FileZilla_3.10.3_win64-setup.exe/download?nowrap

              It's a way for projects to generate income.

              I 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • I
                IRJ @A Former User
                last edited by

                @thecreativeone91 said:

                It's a way for projects to generate income.

                I find it annoying, but acceptable for freeware to bundle other programs. I've seen it on software so much that I am trained to always do custom installs and EXPECT them to try to sneak something in. Just be careful when going through the typical next, next, next procedure.

                M R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • M
                  MattSpeller @IRJ
                  last edited by

                  @IRJ said:

                  I find it annoying, but acceptable for freeware to bundle other programs. I've seen it on software so much that I am trained to always do custom installs and EXPECT them to try to sneak something in. Just be careful when going through the typical next, next, next procedure.

                  I'd love to see some honesty in the process. Have a splash page where the "next" button is moved to the top of the window. Window reads: we do this out of our own pocket, if you're interested in any of this _______ click on it so we make some money. If not, next button is up there ^^^

                  I 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • I
                    IRJ @MattSpeller
                    last edited by

                    @MattSpeller said:

                    @IRJ said:

                    I find it annoying, but acceptable for freeware to bundle other programs. I've seen it on software so much that I am trained to always do custom installs and EXPECT them to try to sneak something in. Just be careful when going through the typical next, next, next procedure.

                    I'd love to see some honesty in the process. Have a splash page where the "next" button is moved to the top of the window. Window reads: we do this out of our own pocket, if you're interested in any of this _______ click on it so we make some money. If not, next button is up there ^^^

                    Yes, but we have discussed bloatware here before and in reality it only effects non-technical users. Whether they try to slip in additional software into installers or it comes pre loaded on PCs its really the non-technical users that keep the cost down for others.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • I
                      IRJ @MattSpeller
                      last edited by

                      @MattSpeller said:

                      @IRJ said:

                      I find it annoying, but acceptable for freeware to bundle other programs. I've seen it on software so much that I am trained to always do custom installs and EXPECT them to try to sneak something in. Just be careful when going through the typical next, next, next procedure.

                      I'd love to see some honesty in the process. Have a splash page where the "next" button is moved to the top of the window. Window reads: we do this out of our own pocket, if you're interested in any of this _______ click on it so we make some money. If not, next button is up there ^^^

                      The non-technical users would not purposely install it.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        One reason I avoid CNet/Download.com. I use Ninite for everything like that nowadays.

                        R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • T
                          thanksajdotcom
                          last edited by

                          Or I go directly to the vendor's website. The problem is how many vendors use Sourcefourge/Download.com. However, I know Filezilla can be installed with Ninite. 😉

                          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User @thanksajdotcom
                            last edited by

                            @thanksajdotcom said:

                            Or I go directly to the vendor's website. The problem is how many vendors use Sourcefourge/Download.com. However, I know Filezilla can be installed with Ninite. 😉

                            If the Author is using sourceforge in the first place it's likely because they don't have the bandwidth to host downloads.

                            Anyway Ninite is only free for home use.

                            T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • T
                              thanksajdotcom @A Former User
                              last edited by

                              @thecreativeone91 said:

                              @thanksajdotcom said:

                              Or I go directly to the vendor's website. The problem is how many vendors use Sourcefourge/Download.com. However, I know Filezilla can be installed with Ninite. 😉

                              If the Author is using sourceforge in the first place it's likely because they don't have the bandwidth to host downloads.

                              Anyway Ninite is only free for home use.

                              Yes, I know.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                              • S
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                FileZilla is available from Chocolatey repos too.

                                T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • T
                                  thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  FileZilla is available from Chocolatey repos too.

                                  True. I hadn't thought of that.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • R
                                    Rob Dunn @thanksajdotcom
                                    last edited by

                                    @thanksajdotcom said:

                                    One reason I avoid CNet/Download.com. I use Ninite for everything like that nowadays.

                                    Yes, I do like Ninite for this, but on my work PC, that's a no-no.

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • T
                                      thanksajdotcom @Rob Dunn
                                      last edited by

                                      @Rob-Dunn said:

                                      @thanksajdotcom said:

                                      One reason I avoid CNet/Download.com. I use Ninite for everything like that nowadays.

                                      Yes, I do like Ninite for this, but on my work PC, that's a no-no.

                                      Then Chocolately it is. 😉

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • R
                                        Rob Dunn @IRJ
                                        last edited by

                                        @IRJ said:

                                        @thecreativeone91 said:

                                        It's a way for projects to generate income.

                                        I find it annoying, but acceptable for freeware to bundle other programs. I've seen it on software so much that I am trained to always do custom installs and EXPECT them to try to sneak something in. Just be careful when going through the typical next, next, next procedure.

                                        Freeware is one thing, but Open Source, I dunno. Seems like the whole 'making profit' by shady methods is kind of counter to the whole Open Source movement in general. If you want to promote sharing and code maturity via the collective, making money from some profit-centered and possibly harmful utility really accomplishes only the opposite desired effect, IMHO.

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • S
                                          scottalanmiller @Rob Dunn
                                          last edited by

                                          @Rob-Dunn said:

                                          @IRJ said:

                                          @thecreativeone91 said:

                                          It's a way for projects to generate income.

                                          I find it annoying, but acceptable for freeware to bundle other programs. I've seen it on software so much that I am trained to always do custom installs and EXPECT them to try to sneak something in. Just be careful when going through the typical next, next, next procedure.

                                          Freeware is one thing, but Open Source, I dunno. Seems like the whole 'making profit' by shady methods is kind of counter to the whole Open Source movement in general. If you want to promote sharing and code maturity via the collective, making money from some profit-centered and possibly harmful utility really accomplishes only the opposite desired effect, IMHO.

                                          Not really. Open source is purely about the accessibility to the source. How, why or if people make profit is really unrelated. Open source and free don't have any necessary reason to go together. Shady business or money making rarely goes directly with any social movement, but beyond that that the source is open doesn't really play in to the money making aspect. If anything, it makes it easier as the open source movement isn't concerned with people making money from what they have made, with most licenses.

                                          T R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • T
                                            thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            @Rob-Dunn said:

                                            @IRJ said:

                                            @thecreativeone91 said:

                                            It's a way for projects to generate income.

                                            I find it annoying, but acceptable for freeware to bundle other programs. I've seen it on software so much that I am trained to always do custom installs and EXPECT them to try to sneak something in. Just be careful when going through the typical next, next, next procedure.

                                            Freeware is one thing, but Open Source, I dunno. Seems like the whole 'making profit' by shady methods is kind of counter to the whole Open Source movement in general. If you want to promote sharing and code maturity via the collective, making money from some profit-centered and possibly harmful utility really accomplishes only the opposite desired effect, IMHO.

                                            Not really. Open source is purely about the accessibility to the source. How, why or if people make profit is really unrelated. Open source and free don't have any necessary reason to go together. Shady business or money making rarely goes directly with any social movement, but beyond that that the source is open doesn't really play in to the money making aspect. If anything, it makes it easier as the open source movement isn't concerned with people making money from what they have made, with most licenses.

                                            Exactly. Open source means the code is available to anyone, and things like the GNU GPL protect Open source rights as the code changes over time and goes from one person's hands to another. Someone may have something open-source they give out for free. Someone is completely allowed to come along, make changes to it and then package it and sell it. However, they must maintain the code as open-source (assuming it's licensed with CC or GNU GPL or even public domain). However, they must make the source available. and allow others to do what they want with it. Also, they often have to show the changes they made from the original code or at least the code they received.

                                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post