ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    HTML code help

    IT Discussion
    6
    42
    7.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @technobabble
      last edited by

      @technobabble said:

      Cuz everyone wants to show off their new shiny toys and ideas first. HOWEVER I will say that IE is the worst offender. It's like they have never seen the W3C information.

      Well they actively didn't want to follow the W3C, at least not originally, because it didn't fit their vision. That is changing now as their vision failed, but that was the original intent.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @RoguePacket
        last edited by

        @RoguePacket said:

        @technobabble

        Wonder if that was more a Ballmer thing (the guy of the "I will f@cking destroy those guys" fame)

        Considering Netscape wasn't good enough so they made IE
        Java wasn't good enough, so j#
        C/C++ wasn't good enough, so C#
        Flash wasn't good enough, so Silverlight

        Not that they weren't good enough, they just weren't proprietary. It was all an attempt to move people to Microsoft platforms.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Can't forget... they didn't want to use JavaScipt so they made JScript.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T
            technobabble
            last edited by

            Too true and although there are many MS things along the way I have liked, most of what you mentioned was wasted time on programming much like Office Accounting. MS giveth and MS taketh away. Look for my upcoming RANTs on MS OneNote and Outlook 365.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              J++ was the original replacement to Java. It was just a really crappy version of Java. I had a Visual J++ kit once up on a time.

              J++ was replaced by J# in 2004 which kept the Java syntax but switched from Java VM underneath to the .NET system. Making it "easy" for Java people to move over to the .NET world.

              But that too was discontinued in 2006 as C# itself was always a Java replacement, not targeted at C/C++ but at Java. Java is a C derivative in syntax as is C#, so in a way it's all C, sort of, but conceptually Java and .NET are pretty far removed. C# goes after Java though, not C. Microsoft maintains Visual C++ as their C/C++ replacement.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @technobabble
                last edited by

                @technobabble said:

                Look for my upcoming RANTs on MS OneNote and Outlook 365.

                Office 365?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T
                  technobabble
                  last edited by technobabble

                  LOL...I should have said the Office 365 Outlook browser web app.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @technobabble
                    last edited by

                    @technobabble said:

                    LOL...I should have said the Office 365 Outlook browser web app.

                    Oh, that's just normal OWA.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T
                      technobabble
                      last edited by

                      But it opens different than straight OWA.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @technobabble
                        last edited by

                        @technobabble said:

                        But it opens different than straight OWA.

                        In what way? Are you comparing it to the latest OWA from Exchange 2013?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T
                          technobabble
                          last edited by

                          Ah...that might explain your comment. About 4 months ago one of my clients OWA was from Comcast and it didn't look the same, so I presume they weren't using 2013 Exchange.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @technobabble
                            last edited by

                            @technobabble said:

                            Ah...that might explain your comment. About 4 months ago one of my clients OWA was from Comcast and it didn't look the same, so I presume they weren't using 2013 Exchange.

                            OWA 2013 is definitely much different than any of the OWAs in 2010.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1
                            • 2
                            • 3
                            • 2 / 3
                            • First post
                              Last post