Pi-hole dumps on Fedora
-
@VoIP_n00b said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
No it’s more about an in place solution and the cost to change.
pihole uninstall && curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/master/scripts/install.sh | shThat was hard - take the rest of the day off to rest up.
Did you missed the part about the cost to change?
-
This post is deleted! -
@black3dynamite said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Did you missed the part about the cost to change?
What cost? Also, what's the cost of trying to get it to work on F33? - it must be higher.
-
I don't see the problem. This is to be expected when running production on Fedora and especially so when it's unsupported by the software.
Using RedHat distros there is not much choice:
- new-release-every-6-month-and-hope-for-the-best Fedora
- new-release-every-5-year-and-run-very-old-packages RHEL/CentOS
While it's a good fit for some, a lot of companies would prefer something in between these two options.
Pi-hole obviously don't have the resources to keep up with every imaginable distro and every new release of it. So when you run Pi-hole on an unsupported distro or version of a distro, such as Fedora 33, you may run into problems.
If they are committed to support Fedora, and that is the way it looks, they're probably working on supporting F33.
-
Going back to the question @JaredBusch I have done it with the Force Switch. Or Setting it to not check on the OS version https://docs.pi-hole.net/main/prerequisites/
-
@black3dynamite said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@VoIP_n00b said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
No it’s more about an in place solution and the cost to change.
pihole uninstall && curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/master/scripts/install.sh | shThat was hard - take the rest of the day off to rest up.
Did you missed the part about the cost to change?
Of course he did. He has no idea what it means to actually be a business.
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
If they are committed to support Fedora, and that is the way it looks, they're probably working on supporting F33.
Fedora has been a supported OS for years.
https://docs.pi-hole.net/main/prerequisites/#supported-operating-systemsThat there is some stupid slowness about getting on to 33 from that team is a different issue.
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
new-release-every-6-month-and-hope-for-the-best Fedora
Ubuntu is no different. Just even crappier.
-
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
If they are committed to support Fedora, and that is the way it looks, they're probably working on supporting F33.
Fedora has been a supported OS for years.
https://docs.pi-hole.net/main/prerequisites/#supported-operating-systemsThat there is some stupid slowness about getting on to 33 from that team is a different issue.
No, it's not a different issue, it's exactly the same issue. Being committed means just that.
F33 was released in October and now it's March. In less than 2 months F34 will be released.
If they really were committed to support Fedora, F33 would have been officially supported months ago. -
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
new-release-every-6-month-and-hope-for-the-best Fedora
Ubuntu is no different. Just even crappier.
Normal Ubuntu yes, but that is why an LTS version exists.
I don't know if it's actually better since we don't run Ubuntu, but the concept is better.
That's also why there is an LTS release of the linux kernel. -
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Normal Ubuntu yes, but that is why an LTS version exists.
just no.
-
@stacksofplates just no. @JaredBusch prefers the hard way.
-
@VoIP_n00b said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates just no. @JaredBusch prefers the hard way.
Don't put words in my mouth.
-
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
Pi-Hole's docker version was not a well done container 3 years ago when I implemented this solution. It was by no means a good idea at the time.
-
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
Pi-Hole's docker version was not a well done container 3 years ago when I implemented this solution. It was by no means a good idea at the time.
Well I just meant going forward. It sounded harsh, I didn't mean it to sound that way. You could just tell the container to use the existing directories and not have to worry about anything.
-
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
Pi-Hole's docker version was not a well done container 3 years ago when I implemented this solution. It was by no means a good idea at the time.
Well I just meant going forward.
That gets into different issues since Fedora went with podman. I haven't done much tinkering with it yet to see how compatible things are.
-
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@stacksofplates said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
Pi-Hole's docker version was not a well done container 3 years ago when I implemented this solution. It was by no means a good idea at the time.
Well I just meant going forward.
That gets into different issues since Fedora went with podman. I haven't done much tinkering with it yet to see how compatible things are.
It's a drop in replacement. It doesn't use the Docker socket so you can't use things like docker-compose, but I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing. Any normal tasks should be the same. There's people who have said they aliased podman to docker and never noticed a difference.
