Pi-hole dumps on Fedora
-
Just switch to AdGuard Home already
-
@JaredBusch
What’s the problem with AdGuard? -
@gjacobse said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch
What’s the problem with AdGuard?One can only guess its about VoIP_n00B
-
-
@black3dynamite said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@gjacobse said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch
What’s the problem with AdGuard?One can only guess its about VoIP_n00B
No it’s more about an in place solution and the cost to change.
The current solution has worked just fine up until now. Changing for no reason is an expense the business doe s not need. Why spend money that it has no reason to spend.
Unlike Aaron, I actually do try to be fiscally responsible for my clients and don’t chase the latest new shiny toy.
-
@VoIP_n00b said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just switch to AdGuard Home already
I seem to recall AdGuard was embroiled in something where advertisers were paying to be whitelisted. Maybe it was a different product?
-
@Grey said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@VoIP_n00b said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Just switch to AdGuard Home already
I seem to recall AdGuard was embroiled in something where advertisers were paying to be whitelisted. Maybe it was a different product?
Adblock Plus
-
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
No it’s more about an in place solution and the cost to change.
pihole uninstall && curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/master/scripts/install.sh | shThat was hard - take the rest of the day off to rest up.
-
@VoIP_n00b said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
No it’s more about an in place solution and the cost to change.
pihole uninstall && curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/master/scripts/install.sh | shThat was hard - take the rest of the day off to rest up.
Did you missed the part about the cost to change?
-
This post is deleted! -
@black3dynamite said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Did you missed the part about the cost to change?
What cost? Also, what's the cost of trying to get it to work on F33? - it must be higher.
-
I don't see the problem. This is to be expected when running production on Fedora and especially so when it's unsupported by the software.
Using RedHat distros there is not much choice:
- new-release-every-6-month-and-hope-for-the-best Fedora
- new-release-every-5-year-and-run-very-old-packages RHEL/CentOS
While it's a good fit for some, a lot of companies would prefer something in between these two options.
Pi-hole obviously don't have the resources to keep up with every imaginable distro and every new release of it. So when you run Pi-hole on an unsupported distro or version of a distro, such as Fedora 33, you may run into problems.
If they are committed to support Fedora, and that is the way it looks, they're probably working on supporting F33.
-
Going back to the question @JaredBusch I have done it with the Force Switch. Or Setting it to not check on the OS version https://docs.pi-hole.net/main/prerequisites/
-
@black3dynamite said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@VoIP_n00b said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
No it’s more about an in place solution and the cost to change.
pihole uninstall && curl -sSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/master/scripts/install.sh | shThat was hard - take the rest of the day off to rest up.
Did you missed the part about the cost to change?
Of course he did. He has no idea what it means to actually be a business.
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
If they are committed to support Fedora, and that is the way it looks, they're probably working on supporting F33.
Fedora has been a supported OS for years.
https://docs.pi-hole.net/main/prerequisites/#supported-operating-systemsThat there is some stupid slowness about getting on to 33 from that team is a different issue.
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
new-release-every-6-month-and-hope-for-the-best Fedora
Ubuntu is no different. Just even crappier.
-
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
If they are committed to support Fedora, and that is the way it looks, they're probably working on supporting F33.
Fedora has been a supported OS for years.
https://docs.pi-hole.net/main/prerequisites/#supported-operating-systemsThat there is some stupid slowness about getting on to 33 from that team is a different issue.
No, it's not a different issue, it's exactly the same issue. Being committed means just that.
F33 was released in October and now it's March. In less than 2 months F34 will be released.
If they really were committed to support Fedora, F33 would have been officially supported months ago. -
@JaredBusch said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
new-release-every-6-month-and-hope-for-the-best Fedora
Ubuntu is no different. Just even crappier.
Normal Ubuntu yes, but that is why an LTS version exists.
I don't know if it's actually better since we don't run Ubuntu, but the concept is better.
That's also why there is an LTS release of the linux kernel. -
Just run it in a container and none of this matters.
-
@Pete-S said in Pi-hole dumps on Fedora:
Normal Ubuntu yes, but that is why an LTS version exists.
just no.
