ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office

    IT Discussion
    15
    74
    5.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • 1
      1337
      last edited by 1337

      @beta said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

      We have PA subscriptions for antivirus/IPS/URL filtering etc. and since we plan to have a VPN between the 2 sites, I'm not sure if it would make sense to get those subscriptions again if we bought a 220 instead of just routing all the traffic to HQ.

      You'll put a lot more traffic over the HQ WAN by routing branch office traffic destined for the internet that way.
      Ideally you'd just want traffic over the VPN that is destined for some resource on the HQ LAN. It will give you superior bandwidth utilization.

      We have a customer who runs PA820s and they removed all their L3 routing in switches and routers and now route all their VLANs through the PA. You'll have more control over security that way. Doing the same at your branch office makes sense.

      Since you have Palo Alto at HQ I would get the same brand for the branch office. Not because you absolutely have to, but because it's easier to manage and easier if you have a problem and need Palo Alto support to figure out the problem.

      When it comes to URL filtering at the branch office there are other options, for instance Cloudflare Gateway.

      Regarding VOIP I think it's better to just run the phones directly to the HQ PBX. 10 people is not enough to bother with a local PBX.

      So in summary:

      • A PA-220 at the branch office with whatever VLANs you need set up in it.
      • Internet traffic goes to the internet.
      • Traffic to HQ goes over the VPN link.
      • IP phones connects directly to HQ over the VPN link.
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • B
        beta
        last edited by

        I forgot to ask, who do you guys like for Wireless Access Points? We'll probably need to add a few of those too. Currently our main facility is covered with Cisco APs and a 5508 controller. I don't think we're going to need that many APs for this location obviously.

        DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @beta
          last edited by Dashrender

          @beta said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

          I forgot to ask, who do you guys like for Wireless Access Points? We'll probably need to add a few of those too. Currently our main facility is covered with Cisco APs and a 5508 controller. I don't think we're going to need that many APs for this location obviously.

          We had a Cisco 20K solution here originally. I dumped that and replaced it with a Ubiquiti Unifi AP solution.
          The controller is free software that runs on my VM host, but could just as easily run in a VPS like Vultr for $5/m. APs were $90 or so each, 15 of them, $1350 plus my time to install them (the previous 20K included their installation).

          I'm pretty sure Unifi APs weren't around when the Cisco's went in in 2007, but damn did we save a bundle this upgrade time around.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @beta
            last edited by

            @beta said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

            I forgot to ask, who do you guys like for Wireless Access Points? We'll probably need to add a few of those too. Currently our main facility is covered with Cisco APs and a 5508 controller. I don't think we're going to need that many APs for this location obviously.

            Ubiquiti Unifi. Blows the Ciscos out of the water at a fraction of the cost. They are so much better, and so much cheaper, that we generally replace existing Cisco units with them because the cost of configuring Ciscos alone is enough higher to on its own cover the cost of the upgrade.

            IRJI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • IRJI
              IRJ @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

              @beta said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

              I forgot to ask, who do you guys like for Wireless Access Points? We'll probably need to add a few of those too. Currently our main facility is covered with Cisco APs and a 5508 controller. I don't think we're going to need that many APs for this location obviously.

              Ubiquiti Unifi. Blows the Ciscos out of the water at a fraction of the cost. They are so much better, and so much cheaper, that we generally replace existing Cisco units with them because the cost of configuring Ciscos alone is enough higher to on its own cover the cost of the upgrade.

              What do you think of Palo Alto?

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @IRJ
                last edited by

                @IRJ said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                @scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                @beta said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                I forgot to ask, who do you guys like for Wireless Access Points? We'll probably need to add a few of those too. Currently our main facility is covered with Cisco APs and a 5508 controller. I don't think we're going to need that many APs for this location obviously.

                Ubiquiti Unifi. Blows the Ciscos out of the water at a fraction of the cost. They are so much better, and so much cheaper, that we generally replace existing Cisco units with them because the cost of configuring Ciscos alone is enough higher to on its own cover the cost of the upgrade.

                What do you think of Palo Alto?

                For ACCESS POINTS? Zero experience. They are generally good products, and generally very expensive. But I never deal with them in a wifi context so they might be amazing or terrible. I didn't even know that they made wifi gear so that's my level of knowledge on it πŸ˜‰

                IRJI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • IRJI
                  IRJ @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                  @IRJ said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                  @beta said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                  I forgot to ask, who do you guys like for Wireless Access Points? We'll probably need to add a few of those too. Currently our main facility is covered with Cisco APs and a 5508 controller. I don't think we're going to need that many APs for this location obviously.

                  Ubiquiti Unifi. Blows the Ciscos out of the water at a fraction of the cost. They are so much better, and so much cheaper, that we generally replace existing Cisco units with them because the cost of configuring Ciscos alone is enough higher to on its own cover the cost of the upgrade.

                  What do you think of Palo Alto?

                  For ACCESS POINTS? Zero experience. They are generally good products, and generally very expensive. But I never deal with them in a wifi context so they might be amazing or terrible. I didn't even know that they made wifi gear so that's my level of knowledge on it πŸ˜‰

                  I believe they use Aruba for their APs

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stacksofplatesS
                    stacksofplates @krisleslie
                    last edited by stacksofplates

                    @krisleslie said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                    @scottalanmiller there is suppose to be a new USG being made since I think they are switching the cpu/chipset over for the entire product line. But honestly, until reviews are back and tested I'm holding funds. Just turning on the traffic analysis makes me cringe since it's not able to handle it without losing too much speed.

                    Are you talking about the dream machine?

                    Edit: I just saw a reddit post about an update to the USG line so I'm guessing not.

                    scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                      last edited by

                      @stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                      Are you talking about the dream machine?

                      I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.

                      stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                        last edited by

                        @stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                        Edit: I just saw a reddit post about an update to the USG line so I'm guessing not.

                        I've been looking for some inside info on that, got a link?

                        stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B
                          bholler @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller

                          I disagree with EdgeRouters. I think Mikrotik has better routing and switching performance.

                          Just my experience .

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @bholler
                            last edited by

                            @bholler said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                            @scottalanmiller

                            I disagree with EdgeRouters. I think Mikrotik has better routing and switching performance.

                            Just my experience .

                            I like both, for sure. No issue with Mikrotik. But overall I'm generally preferring EdgeRouter for customers, I like the monitoring better and the hardware.

                            RomoR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • RomoR
                              Romo @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller https://community.ui.com/questions/Introducing-the-UniFi-Next-Gen-Gateway-Product-Line-Starting-with-UXG-Pro-/732dd4dd-10bf-463c-8622-382d77702872

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @Romo
                                last edited by

                                @Romo said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                @scottalanmiller https://community.ui.com/questions/Introducing-the-UniFi-Next-Gen-Gateway-Product-Line-Starting-with-UXG-Pro-/732dd4dd-10bf-463c-8622-382d77702872

                                Available in Early Access for $499, not had. This is the replacement for the Pro, no announce USG replacement yet. But this is a good start.

                                Moving from EdgeOS to UnifiOS and from MIPS to ARM.

                                JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                  Moving from EdgeOS to UnifiOS

                                  Having it be customized EdgeOS made the original USG a total piece of trash.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • S
                                    StorageNinja Vendor @JaredBusch
                                    last edited by

                                    @JaredBusch said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                    If you network is down to outside factors you don’t get in trouble for 911 calls not completing. That has never been a thing. POTS goes down all the time.

                                    In theory POTS is more reliable for 911 address lookup. In reality if I'm calling 911 in an office it's likely going to be from my cell phone assuming service.

                                    Nothing stops you from getting a SIM card modem backup for the PBX, or for IP using a SD-WAN solution that bridges in cellular networks to cover normal circuit outages.

                                    JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • JaredBuschJ
                                      JaredBusch @StorageNinja
                                      last edited by

                                      @StorageNinja said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                      In theory POTS is more reliable for 911 address lookup.

                                      Completely not true. POTS is not any different, except the carrier does not let you specify the address for a phone number in a convenient portal. Instead it is your billing address unless you go outside of default.

                                      But the carrier is simply updating the PSAP database, no different than what happens when you certify and address to a DID with your SIP provider.

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @StorageNinja
                                        last edited by

                                        @StorageNinja said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                        Nothing stops you from getting a SIM card modem backup for the PBX, or for IP using a SD-WAN solution that bridges in cellular networks to cover normal circuit outages.

                                        There are lots of mitigations that one can do. But they are not required by law.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stacksofplatesS
                                          stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by stacksofplates

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                          @stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                          Are you talking about the dream machine?

                                          I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.

                                          I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
                                          If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.

                                          DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stacksofplatesS
                                            stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                            @stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:

                                            Edit: I just saw a reddit post about an update to the USG line so I'm guessing not.

                                            I've been looking for some inside info on that, got a link?

                                            It was just sometime that said there's an update. There wasn't any information

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 2 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post