Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software
-
Just because you are capable of doing something doesn't mean you're allowed to.
Obviously ConnectWise is of the stance, that "If MS didn't want you to do this they would stop you".
To which any sane person would say "How would MS know what is going to be installed on any OS?"
-
To ask, can't you install .net on linux? Maybe the vendor is just being lazy or there is just some functionality that isn't in the linux version so it doesn't work there.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
To ask, can't you install .net on linux? Maybe the vendor is just being lazy or there is just some functionality that isn't in the linux version so it doesn't work there.
Yes, they specifically said that they will never do .NET on linux because they would have to 'completely re-write' their software. The windows version is .net but in linux they built it on mono.
-
@CCWTech said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
To ask, can't you install .net on linux? Maybe the vendor is just being lazy or there is just some functionality that isn't in the linux version so it doesn't work there.
Yes, they specifically said that they will never do .NET on linux because they would have to 'completely re-write' their software. The windows version is .net but in linux they built it on mono.
Gotcha, so they are being lazy or don't have the capability any more to update the code on linux.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@CCWTech said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
To ask, can't you install .net on linux? Maybe the vendor is just being lazy or there is just some functionality that isn't in the linux version so it doesn't work there.
Yes, they specifically said that they will never do .NET on linux because they would have to 'completely re-write' their software. The windows version is .net but in linux they built it on mono.
Gotcha, so they are being lazy or don't have the capability any more to update the code on linux.
Yes, especially 'dirty' is that they proclaim to work on linux. They don't specify a limit.
You must buy the product, install it and then find out that it doesn't work on the OS they say it works on. If there is a limit, it should be disclosed prior to buying.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@CCWTech said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
To ask, can't you install .net on linux? Maybe the vendor is just being lazy or there is just some functionality that isn't in the linux version so it doesn't work there.
Yes, they specifically said that they will never do .NET on linux because they would have to 'completely re-write' their software. The windows version is .net but in linux they built it on mono.
Gotcha, so they are being lazy or don't have the capability any more to update the code on linux.
And yes, that's why I used @scottalanmiller 's term of Ghost Ship Software. Since they were bought by connectwise the product really hasn't had any major changes to it.
-
Why can’t they start developing on .net core instead since that will be the one that is equally being developed Microsoft for Windows, Mac and Linux?
-
@black3dynamite said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
Why can’t they start developing on .net core instead since that will be the one that is equally being developed Microsoft for Windows, Mac and Linux?
Because they either don't have the desire or the talent.
-
@black3dynamite said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
Why can’t they start developing on .net core instead since that will be the one that is equally being developed Microsoft for Windows, Mac and Linux?
They can. They are just unwilling to put the effort in apparently.
-
@CCWTech said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@black3dynamite said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
Why can’t they start developing on .net core instead since that will be the one that is equally being developed Microsoft for Windows, Mac and Linux?
They can. They are just unwilling to put the effort in apparently.
They can solve this by updating their system requirements. At least people are warned that it's not great software any longer: https://docs.connectwise.com/ConnectWise_Control_Documentation/Get_started/System_requirements
-
@CCWTech said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@CCWTech said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
@black3dynamite said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
Why can’t they start developing on .net core instead since that will be the one that is equally being developed Microsoft for Windows, Mac and Linux?
They can. They are just unwilling to put the effort in apparently.
They can solve this by updating their system requirements. At least people are warned that it's not great software any longer: https://docs.connectwise.com/ConnectWise_Control_Documentation/Get_started/System_requirements
That should be pretty obviously from their Windows "Server Requirements list"
-
To ask, why are you looking at ConnectWise instead of MeshCentral? Does MC not support your client devices?
-
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
To ask, why are you looking at ConnectWise instead of MeshCentral? Does MC not support your client devices?
Using both. I already own SC and really wanted to be able to have two options.
-
Their documentation from Dec of 2019 shows 2012 R2 as the most current supported OS for up to 10,000+ agents.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
Their documentation from Dec of 2019 shows 2012 R2 as the most current supported OS for up to 10,000+ agents.
Yeah they changed the way they do versions for some reason, latest version is 20.2.27038.7359
I guess I am spending good money after bad by paying yearly maintenance. I just expect that fee would be for them continuing to update their product, but I suppose not so much...
-
@CCWTech Are you sure you aren't paying to be able to continue to have access to your deployed version?
I'm not trying to defend them here at all, just asking what does your "yearly maintenance" actually include?
-
@CCWTech said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
I guess I am spending good money after bad by paying yearly maintenance. I just expect that fee would be for them continuing to update their product, but I suppose not so much...
Compare to other software we know, par for the course when you are trying to sell an online service.
Except I've learned from this experience that they are dishonest, promote criminality, and incompetent because their software (and how it is fundamentally built) is crap. So why the hell would I pay for their cloud service after their on prem service has turned out this way?
-
@DustinB3403 said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
To ask, why are you looking at ConnectWise instead of MeshCentral? Does MC not support your client devices?
He always had two. MC has already replaced TeamViewer. And MC is now the primary and SC the backup. But the backup would be better if it wasn't so costly and worked better. It's crazy slow and wonky and now, pretty far behind on features, too.
I think the real issue is, now that everyone has seen MC, it's embarrassing how bad SC is. The amount of productivity gains we are getting from the switch is unbelievable.
-
@black3dynamite said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
Why can’t they start developing on .net core instead since that will be the one that is equally being developed Microsoft for Windows, Mac and Linux?
Right? The core answer that would be obvious is... because they can't. It seems like, with many software products, the core was developed by some hobbyist long ago, was "good enough" to release, and now they have people who develop fringe components of the product but don't understand how to code the core. So they are trapped, lacking the expertise to support and update their own product.
This is a common pattern that we see in software firms.
-
@CCWTech said in Connectwise Control / Screenconnect recommends you break the law to run their software:
We interpret a different way... I'm going to use that the next time I get pulled over for speeding and see if that works out for me!
That's exactly, "I didn't steal it, I just borrowed it indefinitely without permission."
