One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client
-
@DustinB3403 said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
So you need an agentless backup tool that works with ESXi?
WTF? No. He specifically stated something inside the OS as he stated "file based backup tool"
-
-
@marcinozga said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@scottalanmiller said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@marcinozga said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@JaredBusch said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@marcinozga said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
Veeam agent has an option to do file level backups. But why wouldn't VSS work? I don't think it cares what's running under the OS or whether it's properly configured or not.
I would assume, because the OS is screwed up and VSS is broke. I've seen it before.
In that case I'd just copy the data by hand, then wipe OS and start from scratch.
Not the OS that's screwed up, it's ESXi that's screwed up (over provisioned.) We are trying to take a backup before we remove ESXi.
Can't you shut down VM, copy the VM files from ESXi and be done with it? And after changing hypervisor just convert it to whatever you're migrating to.
can I, yes. But we'd like a good backup prior to taking them offline. And thanks to horrific previous IT decisions, we have no access to do anything if the VM is down. So I need a tech on site to do that, and we have one flying there tonight, but we'd really like a good backup taken prior to them arriving.
-
@DustinB3403 said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
So you need an agentless backup tool that works with ESXi?
No, that's what we have. We need something that does NOT do agentless and does not use VSS.
-
@DustinB3403 said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
UrBackup isn't an agent. I have nowhere to run that from.
-
@scottalanmiller said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@DustinB3403 said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
UrBackup isn't an agent. I have nowhere to run that from.
Can you setup a cheap "server" on a laptop and simply install the agent onto the client. The client and server will find each other and then you create your file level backups.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
We have a critical Windows VM that we need to take a backup of us (manually.) No scheduling needed. We can't use Veeam or anything similar that uses an image based system as VSS is not working due to the former IT company misconfiguring VMware ESXi. So we need a file-based backup tool. The backup medium is a USB disk. We have enough space to hold the backup, but need to write to a file or folder, not take over the entire drive.
Any recommendations on the best tool to use? Thanks
Veeam doesn't use its own VSS driver? Or am I thinking of a different backup util... Have you tried?
-
Duplicati, maybe. I think it still relies on VSS, tho, never had a reason to test it with a broken system.
-
Another option is robocopying the data off needed to rebuild the server or for a server rebuild. That's basically all a VSSless backup will do anyways, except will more easily copy ALL files instead of just the needed minimal.
-
@scottalanmiller said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
The backup medium is a USB disk. We have enough space to hold the backup, but need to write to a file or folder, not take over the entire drive.
Why cant you just get another USB disk? Are they scared to overwrite because there is no backup of other important data on a single USB disk?
-
@DustinB3403 said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@scottalanmiller said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@DustinB3403 said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
UrBackup isn't an agent. I have nowhere to run that from.
Can you setup a cheap "server" on a laptop and simply install the agent onto the client. The client and server will find each other and then you create your file level backups.
No, they have no spare gear.
-
@Obsolesce said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@scottalanmiller said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
We have a critical Windows VM that we need to take a backup of us (manually.) No scheduling needed. We can't use Veeam or anything similar that uses an image based system as VSS is not working due to the former IT company misconfiguring VMware ESXi. So we need a file-based backup tool. The backup medium is a USB disk. We have enough space to hold the backup, but need to write to a file or folder, not take over the entire drive.
Any recommendations on the best tool to use? Thanks
Veeam doesn't use its own VSS driver? Or am I thinking of a different backup util... Have you tried?
Veeam doesn't work. We've tried everything with it. They are even licensed for it. But ESXi is just hosed at this point.
-
@travisdh1 said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
Duplicati, maybe. I think it still relies on VSS, tho, never had a reason to test it with a broken system.
Yes, testing that now. It's running.
-
@Obsolesce said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
Another option is robocopying the data off needed to rebuild the server or for a server rebuild. That's basically all a VSSless backup will do anyways, except will more easily copy ALL files instead of just the needed minimal.
In a pinch, that might do.
-
@IRJ said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@scottalanmiller said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
The backup medium is a USB disk. We have enough space to hold the backup, but need to write to a file or folder, not take over the entire drive.
Why cant you just get another USB disk? Is they scared to overwrite because there is no backup of other important data on a single USB disk?
That we can get, and we have two 4TB drives heading there tonight. But we have USB capacity, that's not the issue. It's ESXi being hosed so we can't get it to write to the USB disks that we have already (we have three attached) due to the overprosinioning killing storage options.
-
@Obsolesce said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
Another option is robocopying the data off needed to rebuild the server or for a server rebuild. That's basically all a VSSless backup will do anyways, except will more easily copy ALL files instead of just the needed minimal.
Syncing to blob or S3 storage is extremely easy as well. Not to mention cheap.
-
@IRJ said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@Obsolesce said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
Another option is robocopying the data off needed to rebuild the server or for a server rebuild. That's basically all a VSSless backup will do anyways, except will more easily copy ALL files instead of just the needed minimal.
Syncing to blob or S3 storage is extremely easy as well. Not to mention cheap.
I'd agree, until I seen 8TB of capacity heading there. Assuming they have a "normal" internet pipe, that's going to take a really really long time to back up and restore that much data over the internet.
-
@Obsolesce said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@IRJ said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@Obsolesce said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
Another option is robocopying the data off needed to rebuild the server or for a server rebuild. That's basically all a VSSless backup will do anyways, except will more easily copy ALL files instead of just the needed minimal.
Syncing to blob or S3 storage is extremely easy as well. Not to mention cheap.
I'd agree, until I seen 8TB of capacity heading there. Assuming they have a "normal" internet pipe, that's going to take a really really long time to back up and restore that much data over the internet.
Even for one month, isn't bad. Not sure that they have a pipe to handle a backup, and definitely not a restore, during our small change window for that.
-
@Obsolesce said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@IRJ said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
@Obsolesce said in One Time, Non-Image, Windows Backup Client:
Another option is robocopying the data off needed to rebuild the server or for a server rebuild. That's basically all a VSSless backup will do anyways, except will more easily copy ALL files instead of just the needed minimal.
Syncing to blob or S3 storage is extremely easy as well. Not to mention cheap.
I'd agree, until I seen 8TB of capacity heading there. Assuming they have a "normal" internet pipe, that's going to take a really really long time to back up and restore that much data over the internet.
Yeah, I'm so used to it being fast as hell from aws instance
