Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier
-
@dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
ZeroTier works on ER-X 2.x
Nice!
(Your link requires a login though)
Then it is probably in the beta forum.
-
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@wrx7m said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch Nice. I may upgrade from an ERX.
Nope. The ER-X 2.0 firmware has been recalled.
I meant upgrade the hardware. But, I didn't realize that it had been recalled.
-
@dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@wrx7m said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch Nice. I may upgrade from an ERX.
Nope. The ER-X 2.0 firmware has been recalled.
That was quick, lol. What happened?
2.0 has been out for a long while, but was never released for ER-X.
2.0.1 has been out since umm, march. It is having some kind of issue with hardware offloading on the ER-X platform. -
jbusch@bna-jared:~$ sudo /var/lib/zerotier-one/zerotier-cli join eXXXXXXXXXXXXX5 200 join OKip a sh 22: ztwfupu3zx: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 2800 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/ether 86:67:37:12:21:da brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.224.0.1/24 brd 10.224.0.255 scope global ztwfupu3zx valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fde4:da74:55b2:8e3a:8599:935d:b9a0:74ae/88 scope global valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::8467:37ff:fe12:21da/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever -
[jbusch@dt-jared ~]$ ssh 10.224.0.1 The authenticity of host '10.224.0.1 (10.224.0.1)' can't be established. ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:RjKCwg8Yi6zs7Pk1gxKVQlV0PlvRKYyOM94LE9f/t3o. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes Warning: Permanently added '10.224.0.1' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts. Welcome to EdgeOS By logging in, accessing, or using the Ubiquiti product, you acknowledge that you have read and understood the Ubiquiti License Agreement (available in the Web UI at, by default, http://192.168.1.1) and agree to be bound by its terms. Linux bna-jared 4.9.79-UBNT #1 SMP Tue Mar 12 16:22:52 UTC 2019 mips64 Welcome to EdgeOS Last login: Fri Apr 26 12:34:21 2019 from 10.254.103.20 jbusch@bna-jared:~$ -
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@wrx7m said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch Nice. I may upgrade from an ERX.
Nope. The ER-X 2.0 firmware has been recalled.
That was quick, lol. What happened?
2.0 has been out for a long while, but was never released for ER-X.
2.0.1 has been out since umm, march. It is having some kind of issue with hardware offloading on the ER-X platform.We have 2.0.1 on the ERX.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@wrx7m said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch Nice. I may upgrade from an ERX.
Nope. The ER-X 2.0 firmware has been recalled.
That was quick, lol. What happened?
2.0 has been out for a long while, but was never released for ER-X.
2.0.1 has been out since umm, march. It is having some kind of issue with hardware offloading on the ER-X platform.We have 2.0.1 on the ERX.
I'm using 2.0.1 but I'm not using offloading.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@wrx7m said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch Nice. I may upgrade from an ERX.
Nope. The ER-X 2.0 firmware has been recalled.
That was quick, lol. What happened?
2.0 has been out for a long while, but was never released for ER-X.
2.0.1 has been out since umm, march. It is having some kind of issue with hardware offloading on the ER-X platform.We have 2.0.1 on the ERX.
So do I. And without issues. Ubiquitous says as much in the post about pulling it.
But there were enough confirmed issues, that they obviously felt strong enough to pull it.
-
If I enable bridging will I have access to my whole network?
-
@Curtis said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
If I enable bridging will I have access to my whole network?
I've never used that feature in ZeroTier, so I have no idea.
-
I wonder if this set up would work correctly on an EdgeOS device?
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/getting-started-software-defined-networking-creating-vpn-zerotier-one -
@Curtis said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
If I enable bridging will I have access to my whole network?
Bridging is a different animal... It takes two ethernet segments and puts them together... Kinda like making them plugged into different ports on the same switch. It does work, but it's a bit aggravating to set up.
-
This post is deleted! -
@Curtis
You can configure routing to allow access to entire network. I am using an Opnsense router to provide routing and firewall so that my laptop is able to connect from anywhere. It also limits the collision domains so that all local traffic (arp and what not) doesn't traverse the wan like on a bridge.
I'm also working on a lab with zerotier, Opnsense and a ER-x to use OSPF for dynamic routing. -
Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.
-
@jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.
I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.
I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.
-
@jplee I want to know this as well
-
@jplee did you allow bridging in the web interface?
-
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.
I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.
I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.
I did get bridging set up, but it was a bit of a pain to get going and I ran into some rather interesting issues, lol.
I have it set up as more of a site-to-site VPN now.
-
@dafyre said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@JaredBusch said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
@jplee said in Apparently the 2.0 line of EdgeOS now supports ZeroTier:
Did anyone get bridging to work? I have ZT installed on an ER-X. I can ping the ZT nodes from the ER-X cli. However, I cannot ping a ZT node from a machine on my internal network that’s not on ZT.
I've never dealt with ZT bridging at all. I only use it point to point as needed.
I believe @dafyre did a bridge a long time ago before some of it was built into the design like it now is.
I did get bridging set up, but it was a bit of a pain to get going and I ran into some rather interesting issues, lol.
I have it set up as more of a site-to-site VPN now.
Isn't that bridging? more or less ?
