ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment

    IT Discussion
    ad dc ad dns windows windows server
    21
    242
    34.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      CloudKnight
      last edited by

      I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

      S O 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • S
        scottalanmiller @CloudKnight
        last edited by

        @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

        I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

        Sure, but what does that really affect? Forest level limitation is nothing like an old code limitation. Nothing wrong with using a 2008 R2 Forest level.

        P C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P
          pmoncho @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

          @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

          I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

          Sure, but what does that really affect? Forest level limitation is nothing like an old code limitation. Nothing wrong with using a 2008 R2 Forest level.

          If I am reading this correctly, I believe Samba 4.4 and higher can go to 2012 R2.

          https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • C
            CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller Very true, nothing wrong at all in using. believe there was some improvements to DFS-R in higher Forrest levels, but if your obviously using Samba in your environment you probably would not be using this role anyway.

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              scottalanmiller @pmoncho
              last edited by

              @pmoncho said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

              @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

              @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

              I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

              Sure, but what does that really affect? Forest level limitation is nothing like an old code limitation. Nothing wrong with using a 2008 R2 Forest level.

              If I am reading this correctly, I believe Samba 4.4 and higher can go to 2012 R2.

              https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels

              Rumor is, but I'm not sure that 4.4 is widely available yet?

              R P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                scottalanmiller @CloudKnight
                last edited by

                @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                @scottalanmiller Very true, nothing wrong at all in using. believe there was some improvements to DFS-R in higher Forrest levels, but if your obviously using Samba in your environment you probably would not be using this role anyway.

                Right, generally not.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  Romo @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                  @pmoncho said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                  @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                  @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                  I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

                  Sure, but what does that really affect? Forest level limitation is nothing like an old code limitation. Nothing wrong with using a 2008 R2 Forest level.

                  If I am reading this correctly, I believe Samba 4.4 and higher can go to 2012 R2.

                  https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels

                  Rumor is, but I'm not sure that 4.4 is widely available yet?

                  Even newer versions =).

                  Centos 7.5 is using 4.7.1
                  Fedora 28 is using 4.8.5

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    pmoncho @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                    @pmoncho said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                    @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                    @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                    I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

                    Sure, but what does that really affect? Forest level limitation is nothing like an old code limitation. Nothing wrong with using a 2008 R2 Forest level.

                    If I am reading this correctly, I believe Samba 4.4 and higher can go to 2012 R2.

                    https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels

                    Rumor is, but I'm not sure that 4.4 is widely available yet?

                    smbstatus on Ubuntu 18.1 shows Samba 4.7.6.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      scottalanmiller @Romo
                      last edited by

                      @romo said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                      @pmoncho said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                      @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                      @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                      I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

                      Sure, but what does that really affect? Forest level limitation is nothing like an old code limitation. Nothing wrong with using a 2008 R2 Forest level.

                      If I am reading this correctly, I believe Samba 4.4 and higher can go to 2012 R2.

                      https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels

                      Rumor is, but I'm not sure that 4.4 is widely available yet?

                      Even newer versions =).

                      Centos 7.5 is using 4.7.1
                      Fedora 28 is using 4.8.5

                      Oh wow, nevermind, lol.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        scottalanmiller @pmoncho
                        last edited by

                        @pmoncho said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                        @pmoncho said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                        @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                        I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

                        Sure, but what does that really affect? Forest level limitation is nothing like an old code limitation. Nothing wrong with using a 2008 R2 Forest level.

                        If I am reading this correctly, I believe Samba 4.4 and higher can go to 2012 R2.

                        https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels

                        Rumor is, but I'm not sure that 4.4 is widely available yet?

                        smbstatus on Ubuntu 18.1 shows Samba 4.7.6.

                        Is that for 18.04 or 18.10, the latter released a few days ago (I need to go update some systems.)

                        C P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C
                          CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          0_1539971107331_samba.png

                          yep, using 18.04.1 here...

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            So likely a bit newer now.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • P
                              pmoncho @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                              @pmoncho said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                              @pmoncho said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                              @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                              I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

                              Sure, but what does that really affect? Forest level limitation is nothing like an old code limitation. Nothing wrong with using a 2008 R2 Forest level.

                              If I am reading this correctly, I believe Samba 4.4 and higher can go to 2012 R2.

                              https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels

                              Rumor is, but I'm not sure that 4.4 is widely available yet?

                              smbstatus on Ubuntu 18.1 shows Samba 4.7.6.

                              Is that for 18.04 or 18.10, the latter released a few days ago (I need to go update some systems.)

                              My bad, it is 18.04.1

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                I hadn't even realized it was out. I suppose I was out of town when it happened. But I feel like there was a lack of fanfare going on. I had heard of ElementaryOS going to 5.0 without hearing that Ubuntu 18.10 was out!

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • O
                                  Obsolesce @CloudKnight
                                  last edited by

                                  @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                                  I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

                                  If you're not using Windows AD, what's it matter?

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    scottalanmiller @Obsolesce
                                    last edited by

                                    @obsolesce said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                                    @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                                    I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

                                    If you're not using Windows AD, what's it matter?

                                    If he's merging in DFS, it might. It's rare to do, but could matter.

                                    O 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • C
                                      CloudKnight
                                      last edited by

                                      https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/it-pro/windows-server-2008-R2-and-2008/cc754918(v=ws.10)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        0_1539973773529_Screenshot from 2018-10-19 13-29-28.png

                                        So 2012 R2 benefits...

                                        1. KDC support for claims. This is a real benefit, but pretty "meh".
                                        2. New authentication policies. Whoop tee do.
                                        3. New authentication policy silos. Even more whoop tee do.

                                        That's it. Two new versions and that is all of the improvements.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • C
                                          CloudKnight @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller hahaha, that's what I wanted to check....I'm sure DFS improvements were there somewhere, not sure what level though.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • O
                                            Obsolesce @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                                            @obsolesce said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                                            @stuartjordan said in Handling DNS in a Single Active Directory Domain Controller Environment:

                                            I believe the forest level with Samba can only be 2008R2 though.

                                            If you're not using Windows AD, what's it matter?

                                            If he's merging in DFS, it might. It's rare to do, but could matter.

                                            Oh I see, so Windows AD and other services were involved at some point.

                                            C scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 9
                                            • 10
                                            • 11
                                            • 12
                                            • 13
                                            • 12 / 13
                                            • First post
                                              Last post