ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Installing FS on a DC

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    33 Posts 11 Posters 2.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • hobbit666H
      hobbit666
      last edited by hobbit666

      On licensing not sure how upto date this is but remember this is how I work out out for cal's
      0_1521706198882_4426.CAL Types.PNG

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @hobbit666
        last edited by

        @hobbit666 that’s for user vs device. These days device are nearly obsolete. When the licenses were new people were commonly sharing devices. Today most people have more than one device each.

        zachary715Z hobbit666H 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • zachary715Z
          zachary715 @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • hobbit666H
            hobbit666 @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller Agreed but it shows nicely what you were saying about the cals covering all servers

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Reid CooperR
              Reid Cooper
              last edited by

              I like User CALs because they are easy. Count users, get that many CALs.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • bbigfordB
                bbigford @DustinB3403
                last edited by

                @dustinb3403 said in Installing FS on a DC:

                So this makes sense, and it might just be a "me issue". But every workload I have ever seen (IME) has been on different Microsoft Server versions.

                IE you need CALs for that version of Windows Server. . . and thus you would need tons of CALs.

                Grr time to investigate.

                Worth noting... You need the amount of CALs to equal users, for a certain platform. 2012 RDS? Needs CALs. Exchange 2013? Needs CALs. Upgraded from 2012 RDS to 2016 RDS and Exchange 2013 to 2016? All new CALs.

                WLS-ITGuyW scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • WLS-ITGuyW
                  WLS-ITGuy @bbigford
                  last edited by

                  @bbigford said in Installing FS on a DC:

                  @dustinb3403 said in Installing FS on a DC:

                  So this makes sense, and it might just be a "me issue". But every workload I have ever seen (IME) has been on different Microsoft Server versions.

                  IE you need CALs for that version of Windows Server. . . and thus you would need tons of CALs.

                  Grr time to investigate.

                  Worth noting... You need the amount of CALs to equal users, for a certain platform. 2012 RDS? Needs CALs. Exchange 2013? Needs CALs. Upgraded from 2012 RDS to 2016 RDS and Exchange 2013 to 2016? All new CALs.

                  That was awesome to find out. The only saving grace for us was 501c3 status. Pennies on the dollar.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @bbigford
                    last edited by

                    @bbigford said in Installing FS on a DC:

                    Worth noting... You need the amount of CALs to equal users, for a certain platform. 2012 RDS? Needs CALs. Exchange 2013? Needs CALs. Upgraded from 2012 RDS to 2016 RDS and Exchange 2013 to 2016? All new CALs.

                    Those are all separate products. That's like saying you have to "pay for each thing you buy."

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @WLS-ITGuy
                      last edited by

                      @wls-itguy said in Installing FS on a DC:

                      @bbigford said in Installing FS on a DC:

                      @dustinb3403 said in Installing FS on a DC:

                      So this makes sense, and it might just be a "me issue". But every workload I have ever seen (IME) has been on different Microsoft Server versions.

                      IE you need CALs for that version of Windows Server. . . and thus you would need tons of CALs.

                      Grr time to investigate.

                      Worth noting... You need the amount of CALs to equal users, for a certain platform. 2012 RDS? Needs CALs. Exchange 2013? Needs CALs. Upgraded from 2012 RDS to 2016 RDS and Exchange 2013 to 2016? All new CALs.

                      That was awesome to find out. The only saving grace for us was 501c3 status. Pennies on the dollar.

                      Or use open source free products for... free. Zero on the dollar πŸ˜‰

                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in Installing FS on a DC:

                        @wls-itguy said in Installing FS on a DC:

                        @bbigford said in Installing FS on a DC:

                        @dustinb3403 said in Installing FS on a DC:

                        So this makes sense, and it might just be a "me issue". But every workload I have ever seen (IME) has been on different Microsoft Server versions.

                        IE you need CALs for that version of Windows Server. . . and thus you would need tons of CALs.

                        Grr time to investigate.

                        Worth noting... You need the amount of CALs to equal users, for a certain platform. 2012 RDS? Needs CALs. Exchange 2013? Needs CALs. Upgraded from 2012 RDS to 2016 RDS and Exchange 2013 to 2016? All new CALs.

                        That was awesome to find out. The only saving grace for us was 501c3 status. Pennies on the dollar.

                        Or use open source free products for... free. Zero on the dollar πŸ˜‰

                        Support is never free, even if someone is donating their time, there is a cost.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @dustinb3403 said in Installing FS on a DC:

                          @scottalanmiller said in Installing FS on a DC:

                          @wls-itguy said in Installing FS on a DC:

                          @bbigford said in Installing FS on a DC:

                          @dustinb3403 said in Installing FS on a DC:

                          So this makes sense, and it might just be a "me issue". But every workload I have ever seen (IME) has been on different Microsoft Server versions.

                          IE you need CALs for that version of Windows Server. . . and thus you would need tons of CALs.

                          Grr time to investigate.

                          Worth noting... You need the amount of CALs to equal users, for a certain platform. 2012 RDS? Needs CALs. Exchange 2013? Needs CALs. Upgraded from 2012 RDS to 2016 RDS and Exchange 2013 to 2016? All new CALs.

                          That was awesome to find out. The only saving grace for us was 501c3 status. Pennies on the dollar.

                          Or use open source free products for... free. Zero on the dollar πŸ˜‰

                          Support is never free, even if someone is donating their time, there is a cost.

                          Right, which is why open source is SO cheap, because it costs LESS to support normally than proprietary software. So it's cheaper than free when compared to alternatives. It's like you get paid to use it!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 1 / 2
                          • First post
                            Last post