AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend
-
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
There is no different process. If you send a picture, that is how it works.
But they send a note, not a picture....
“iPhone 1 would like to share a note with you,” read the note sent at 6:51 p.m. She hit “Accept” and was horrified by what she saw. “It was just a huge close-up picture of a disgusting penis,” said Carlson, of Bushwick, Brooklyn. The message was titled “Straw” and was sent by an anonymous stranger.
-
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@aaronstuder
Perhaps not, was basing on screenshots posted by @JaredBusch . Which I suppose is possibly showing a different process than was discussed in article.
There is no different process. If you send a picture, that is how it works.
I kind of didn't think so but I've not made much use of AirDrop so giving @aaronstuder the benefit of the doubt as he was questioning it.
-
@aaronstuder said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
There is no different process. If you send a picture, that is how it works.
But they send a note, not a picture....
“iPhone 1 would like to share a note with you,” read the note sent at 6:51 p.m. She hit “Accept” and was horrified by what she saw. “It was just a huge close-up picture of a disgusting penis,” said Carlson, of Bushwick, Brooklyn. The message was titled “Straw” and was sent by an anonymous stranger.
If you share a note, it does auto open the note after you accept.
But this is still 100% on the dumb user that click accept to a random message on the subway.
-
-
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
-
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
-
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
-
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
-
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Could have been worse... could have contained sometime even more terrible - really she is lucky that a penis is all see had to see.
-
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
-
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
Google location sharing does this. If you share your location with someone, after 4 days Google will email you a reminder that you are still sharing with them. At the point, you can ignore it and leave it on, or do whatever you like. But I think the reminder is a good thing.
-
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
She has a personal, random, anonymous sharing system turned on for the office? There is no office use case for this, this is purely people sharing random personal pics or files in a building. Clearly she is into AirDropping from people she doesn't know [well] already. She then carried this into her non-work life and then decided, when a picture came in, to accept it. There are layers of protections here. She clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on.
-
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
She has a personal, random, anonymous sharing system turned on for the office? There is no office use case for this, this is purely people sharing random personal pics or files in a building. Clearly she is into AirDropping from people she doesn't know [well] already. She then carried this into her non-work life and then decided, when a picture came in, to accept it. There are layers of protections here. She clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Of course she doesn't. She failed at every layer, doesn't mean my suggestion is any less valuable.
-
To modify a phrase from the Sixth Sense....I see stupid people.....
-
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
She has a personal, random, anonymous sharing system turned on for the office? There is no office use case for this, this is purely people sharing random personal pics or files in a building. Clearly she is into AirDropping from people she doesn't know [well] already. She then carried this into her non-work life and then decided, when a picture came in, to accept it. There are layers of protections here. She clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Of course she doesn't. She failed at every layer, doesn't mean my suggestion is any less valuable.
Why, she would have just disabled that. She clearly WANTED to see what the picture was. So giving her yet another way to not do that would have changed nothing.
-
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
She has a personal, random, anonymous sharing system turned on for the office? There is no office use case for this, this is purely people sharing random personal pics or files in a building. Clearly she is into AirDropping from people she doesn't know [well] already. She then carried this into her non-work life and then decided, when a picture came in, to accept it. There are layers of protections here. She clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Of course she doesn't. She failed at every layer, doesn't mean my suggestion is any less valuable.
Why, she would have just disabled that. She clearly WANTED to see what the picture was. So giving her yet another way to not do that would have changed nothing.
LOL - You're right Scott - she wanted to see Dick picks, and then she wanted to go on TV and bitch about it
-
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
She has a personal, random, anonymous sharing system turned on for the office? There is no office use case for this, this is purely people sharing random personal pics or files in a building. Clearly she is into AirDropping from people she doesn't know [well] already. She then carried this into her non-work life and then decided, when a picture came in, to accept it. There are layers of protections here. She clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Of course she doesn't. She failed at every layer, doesn't mean my suggestion is any less valuable.
Why, she would have just disabled that. She clearly WANTED to see what the picture was. So giving her yet another way to not do that would have changed nothing.
Maybe, maybe not and certainly the fact that it may not have helped her does not mean that it wouldn't help others.
-
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
She has a personal, random, anonymous sharing system turned on for the office? There is no office use case for this, this is purely people sharing random personal pics or files in a building. Clearly she is into AirDropping from people she doesn't know [well] already. She then carried this into her non-work life and then decided, when a picture came in, to accept it. There are layers of protections here. She clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Of course she doesn't. She failed at every layer, doesn't mean my suggestion is any less valuable.
Why, she would have just disabled that. She clearly WANTED to see what the picture was. So giving her yet another way to not do that would have changed nothing.
LOL - You're right Scott - she wanted to see Dick picks, and then she wanted to go on TV and bitch about it
That's my point. She went dramatically out of her way to invite and enable this exact scenario. Then took that opportunity to get publicity. There is one and only one perpetrator here.
-
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
She has a personal, random, anonymous sharing system turned on for the office? There is no office use case for this, this is purely people sharing random personal pics or files in a building. Clearly she is into AirDropping from people she doesn't know [well] already. She then carried this into her non-work life and then decided, when a picture came in, to accept it. There are layers of protections here. She clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Of course she doesn't. She failed at every layer, doesn't mean my suggestion is any less valuable.
Why, she would have just disabled that. She clearly WANTED to see what the picture was. So giving her yet another way to not do that would have changed nothing.
Maybe, maybe not and certainly the fact that it may not have helped her does not mean that it wouldn't help others.
Oh it's a fine idea to have, but doesn't address the situation going on. Just dont' turn it on (what a dumb idea) and if you leave it on, don't accept things. It's already so beyond secure that anything more is just silly.
-
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@scottalanmiller said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@jaredbusch said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@dashrender said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
@ndc said in AirDropping is the latest horrifying subway trend:
Given the way this process works I'm thinking all the people jumping on the "Why ever would you hit the accept button, these people are so stupid." bandwagon are likely on the wrong track. Since you see the picture regardless of choice due to the preview I can only imagine that victims are hitting accept to preserve some evidence of what is happening.
They probably should be more careful about their settings but it doesn't make the perpetrators any less garbage.
LOL - well your persistence paid off. It was a note, and notes don't have previews... So yeah.. stupid user, but yes - sender is still piece of shit.
The sender being a piece of shit or not is not relevant.
The stupid fucking user is at fault for accepting something from a stranger.
FFS. Even my 7yo knows "Dont' talk to strangers"
And don't advertise that you are interesting in talking to strangers. This is more than accepting an anonymous note. She had to enable getting anonymous notes first.
Very much so. But she did supposedly have it set to everyone for picture sharing in the office.
Potentially, there is a reason not to have everyone in the office know her phone number and vice versa to be able to use contacts only.
"Supposedly". But that was for doing exactly this, but in an office. Randomly pushing things of dubious nature peer to peer rather than through centralized means. I see this as the same as her saying "I was into this sort of thing already, and then I got to enjoy it on the train, too."
really? I don't see it like that at all - but then again, that's why I think they need to have a function that allows the system to auto disable everyone access after xyz timeframe.
She has a personal, random, anonymous sharing system turned on for the office? There is no office use case for this, this is purely people sharing random personal pics or files in a building. Clearly she is into AirDropping from people she doesn't know [well] already. She then carried this into her non-work life and then decided, when a picture came in, to accept it. There are layers of protections here. She clearly doesn't have a leg to stand on.
Of course she doesn't. She failed at every layer, doesn't mean my suggestion is any less valuable.
Why, she would have just disabled that. She clearly WANTED to see what the picture was. So giving her yet another way to not do that would have changed nothing.
LOL - You're right Scott - she wanted to see Dick picks, and then she wanted to go on TV and bitch about it
That's my point. She went dramatically out of her way to invite and enable this exact scenario. Then took that opportunity to get publicity. There is one and only one perpetrator here.
No she didn't. She went out of her way to enable it for the few less than friends people who were in her office to share photos with. Had she understood - though about it, remember, etc, she likely would have turned the feature off after the encounter that prompted her to turn it on in the first place.
