@scottalanmiller said in MS RDS: How Do You Reset Device License Assignment:

how do we reset it to allow for updated devices?

Open "RD Licensing manager", browse for device who's license you want to "revoke", leftclick on it and choose "Revoke license"
As said, up to 20% of total licenses can be revoked before expiry.

@Dashrender said in How much RAM for this VM?:

why does the consumed have those dips?

I'd say this was invoked by the apps running on it. This VM is used for analytics and reporting, it's got Visual Studio, Power Bi and SQL server running on it. The vendor must've been doing some shit on it.

So, because Veeam reapplied the old snapshot, everything between then and now was lost.

If I keep the old snaphot as current, all the systems have domain trust failure.
I have a backup and there is only a single shared folder on here that will need restored.

Because this site is only 20 Windows computers, and I wanted to stop wasting time after 2 hours, I went brute force.

I disjoined everything from the domain and rejoined them.
With that resolved, I restored the C:\shares folder on the DC from the last Veeam backup.
Site is now working again.
Veeam's replication is now also in the correct state to fall back the replica to the main hyper-v server.

Not fucking touching that tonight.. I R DUN.

Edit: Maybe not the perfectly correct answer, but the answer I went with.

@dbeato said in Patch all your Windows DNS servers - CVE-2020-1350 - CVSS score of 10:

@pmoncho said in Patch all your Windows DNS servers - CVE-2020-1350 - CVSS score of 10:

Just wondering - Is anyone seeing a patch for 2019 with a reference to the KB article?
Checked yesterday, last night and this morning. No update that I can see.

Currently performing the workaround.

c46cc947-cad4-4bfc-877c-dbd1c1ddfd16-image.png

https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=KB4558998

Thanks. Forgot about the update catalog.

There you go
http://nitindupare.blogspot.com/2012/08/uninstall-kms-host.html

@Grey said in Issues uninstalling Windows Server 2012 R2 Key:

You mean sfc /scannow? Or DISM.exe /Online /Cleanup-image /Restorehealth?

@op Check your event logs for more information, and try running the commands above.

Ran both, so far nothing, but I will run chkdsk tonight to see if that fixes anything. So far I can't find anything in the logs but I'll keep looking.

@dbeato said in Access Changed Files on VSS Copy on Write Disk Image:

@scottalanmiller said in Access Changed Files on VSS Copy on Write Disk Image:

@black3dynamite said in Access Changed Files on VSS Copy on Write Disk Image:

Mount the disk image on Windows Server instance, from the mounted disk drive, go to Properties and then Previous Versions?

That's what I thought. But it just seemed too easy, lol.

Lol, anything that appears with Microsoft as easy should work but emphasis on "should" 🙂

Emphasis with "assume" too. lol

@teece I haven't seen that happened ever, no other transport rules modified the DKIM at all.

@black3dynamite said in Windows Server 2016 RDS - GPO for Disabling Windows Update Notifications for Non-Admins/Users?:

@wrx7m said in Windows Server 2016 RDS - GPO for Disabling Windows Update Notifications for Non-Admins/Users?:

@black3dynamite said in Windows Server 2016 RDS - GPO for Disabling Windows Update Notifications for Non-Admins/Users?:

@wrx7m Is that a computer configuration or user configuration policy? Try applying the rules to only non-admins groups.

Yeah, it is at the computer level. I would like to do it via user config but I only want them to apply to users on the RD servers. I need to figure out the proper way to structure AD/GPOs to not screw up everything else.

I am guessing creating another OU as a sub container and move the RD servers into.

Edit: Since it isn't GPP, there isn't any item level targeting, so I can't do it that way.

If you can make those changes directly in the registry, maybe can allow you to use GPP and item level targeting.

Hmmm. That makes sense. Let me mull it over.

@Pete-S said in Windows Server licensing for HA?:

If you have two servers and run HA, does that mean that you have to license Windows Server standard for the maximum number of VMs running when you have a failure?

So for example,
Server A: 16 cores, runs 6 VMs normally
Server B: 16 cores, runs 6 VMs normally

So each server has to be licensed for all 12 VMs running on 16 cores - so 6 x Windows Server Standard licenses for each server, total of 12 licenses?

But if you didn't run HA, you would only license each server for 6 VMs, with 3 x Windows Server Standard, a total of 6 licenses?

Is this correct?

Yup.

If you're running a HA setup of Server Standard, all physical servers must be licensed for all Windows Server VMs that can run on them. This means each physical server in your HA cluster must be licensed for 12 Windows Server VMs.

So yes, you are correct in that to license 12 Windows Server VMs on both of your physical servers, you'll need 6x Windows Server Standard licenses for each server, 12 "licenses" total as you said.

WSL2 tells us a lot.

First, Microsoft is really making it more known that WSL has no Linux and is just Ubuntu (or whatever) on the Windows kernel.

Second, Microsoft is making it clearer that there was no virtualization going on in WSL.

Third, now there is Hyper-V and a Linux kernel involved. So now it is just virtualizating a Linux instance on top of Windows.

Fourth, now it is much faster. That means that Linux on Hyper-V is faster than Windows on bare metal!

Within PowerShell can't use something like Push-Location \\Server\Share\path or Set-Location \\Server\Share\path and then run the cipher command?

@dbeato said in Windows Server 2012 Remote Web Access not connecting and RDS services showing error 23005:

@scottalanmiller Yeah, RDW is the problem I understand now. Basically you can remote desktop without need of App Resources Proxy without any problems. But if you try to load the App Resources from a Windows 10 device then yes I understand now.

Yeah. It's a weird "Essentials only" issue, only on 2012 and older. From what I can tell.

@Dashrender said in Domain Planning: Network shares or ,..:

@dafyre said in Domain Planning: Network shares or ,..:

@notverypunny said in Domain Planning: Network shares or ,..:

Does NC allow exposure of their "file shares" as smb? If you have users that can't / don't want to use a browser-based access they can always mount it in windows explorer via webdav. Alfresco allows (allowed?) access via both, but the last time I played with it the performance was meh, which I attributed to it being built on java...

You can mount NextCloud into a drive letter or folder using WebDav.

The question does become the aforementioned performance issue (if there is one).

I wonder how file locks are handled when using WebDav?

There are a few topics elsewhere here where file locking and cloud hosting were discussed. You do have to give up what we have all come to appreciate in file locking. Here is a response in one of those other topics I spoke about:

@scottalanmiller said in file sharing in the 21st century:

@Donahue said in file sharing in the 21st century:

I am aware of that. It's online locking that I am after. Though, I will concede that any locking scheme has to plan for both online and offline. I like sync because of local performance and offline availability, but it really feels like it is best for non shared files. When you add multiple users into the mix, almost everything goes out the window, especially when and if they go offline.

Everything is best for non-shared files 🙂

SMB shines at "always online, always nearly local" files because it handles offline so poorly. It's a balance. To handle offline or very distant (e.g. high latency) networks well, you have to sacrifice locking.

@marcinozga said in Any Way to Automate Adding a New Computer to an AD Group?:

@flaxking said in Any Way to Automate Adding a New Computer to an AD Group?:

@marcinozga said in Any Way to Automate Adding a New Computer to an AD Group?:

Ansible can do that. https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/modules/win_domain_group_membership_module.html#win-domain-group-membership-module
You can add new PCs to domain, and change their group membership, you just need to know computer names in advance.

Which is just a layer on top of Powershell. The Active Directory Powershell module is still required.

It's not required, or that module is included already in Windows 10 by default. Because I haven't had to install it on any machine I managed with Ansible.

"win_domain_group_membership requires the ActiveDirectory PS module to be installed"
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/lib/ansible/modules/windows/win_domain_group_membership.ps1

They have it in the documentation as well "This must be run on a host that has the ActiveDirectory powershell module installed."
https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/modules/win_domain_group_module.html

@Obsolesce said in Deploy Azure resources with Terraform:

@IRJ said in Deploy Azure resources with Terraform:

@Obsolesce said in Deploy Azure resources with Terraform:

@IRJ said in Deploy Azure resources with Terraform:

@Obsolesce

@IRJ said in Deploy Azure resources with Terraform:

@Obsolesce

Yeah good stuff. I have a couple Udemy courses on it.

Something I didn't see in this article was that Cloud Shell has Terraform built in... so you really don't even need to install it. I try to keep things serverless and source controlled, so I wouldn't want to install Terraform.

As long as it uses the latest version of terraform. There are many differences between current and last release.

Screenshot_20190805-163610_Edge.jpg

Cool. Yeah 11 vs 12 are much different. Alot of things have to be redone

@jt1001001 Thanks. If you are running from PDQ deploy, you won't see anything. But, if you are doing it from PS/ISE or similar, that would be a great help.