ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Disaster Recovery - Hosted Server

    IT Discussion
    7
    62
    9.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
      last edited by

      @Breffni-Potter said:

      @scottalanmiller Sure, yet they are different products, with a different pricing structure and distribution method, MS never refer to 365 licenses or services as CALs, so why would we keep the terms the same when the products are very different.

      They changed the name of Lync to Skype for Business to confuse people too, but it's the same product (literally, just a name change.)

      It's because Office 365 really is a CAL. Sure, there is a different pricing structure, but there were always different structures with the same name of the result. It's closer to a CAL than to anything else, right? Why call it something else?

      Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Deleted74295D
        Deleted74295 Banned @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        It's closer to a CAL than to anything else, right? Why call it something else?

        Because MS decided it is not a CAL, it's a per user license 🙂

        scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
          last edited by

          @Breffni-Potter said:

          Because MS decided it is not a CAL, it's a per user license 🙂

          Hmmmmm.....

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @Deleted74295
            last edited by

            @Breffni-Potter said:

            @scottalanmiller said:

            It's closer to a CAL than to anything else, right? Why call it something else?

            Because MS decided it is not a CAL, it's a per user license 🙂

            isn't that what a CAL is?

            scottalanmillerS coliverC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              @Breffni-Potter said:

              @scottalanmiller said:

              It's closer to a CAL than to anything else, right? Why call it something else?

              Because MS decided it is not a CAL, it's a per user license 🙂

              isn't that what a CAL is?

              That's what I thought 🙂

              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @Dashrender said:

                @Breffni-Potter said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                It's closer to a CAL than to anything else, right? Why call it something else?

                Because MS decided it is not a CAL, it's a per user license 🙂

                isn't that what a CAL is?

                That's what I thought 🙂

                LOL!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • coliverC
                  coliver @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @Dashrender said:

                  @Breffni-Potter said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  It's closer to a CAL than to anything else, right? Why call it something else?

                  Because MS decided it is not a CAL, it's a per user license 🙂

                  isn't that what a CAL is?

                  Agreed... I'm not sure the difference between a CAL and a User license in this case. Both are giving you the ability to access services. With Windows Server you have to purchase that additional ability. However with Office365 you are getting the server part of it for free and are just getting the rights to access it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    This is totally not a case where I expected anyone to follow or agree with my odd logic. LOL. It totally made sense in my mind but I anticipated the "Scott's crazy here" response that I often get.

                    What sucks for me is I can't tell when I make complete sense or when everyone will think that I'm crazy.

                    coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • coliverC
                      coliver @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      This is totally not a case where I expected anyone to follow or agree with my odd logic. LOL. It totally made sense in my mind but I anticipated the "Scott's crazy here" response that I often get.

                      What sucks for me is I can't tell when I make complete sense or when everyone will think that I'm crazy.

                      It makes sense to me... although I am no bastion of sanity. Just seems like Microsoft is doing their thing and making their licensing as confusing as possible to trap companies during an audit.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @coliver
                        last edited by

                        @coliver well I don't feel that it is that bad. Just being confusing for marketing reasons. Honestly, it's the kind of thing where it IS different enough that I can see why they did not want to call it CALs, but there ARE CALs inherently in what they are doing.

                        No audit worries, though, unless you are doing something crazy to steal the software. They have handy "lock out" features to make it obvious when you can't use something.

                        coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Deleted74295D
                          Deleted74295 Banned
                          last edited by

                          Well the alternative is I'm just crazy 🙂 I'll go back to my padded cell.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @coliver well I don't feel that it is that bad. Just being confusing for marketing reasons. Honestly, it's the kind of thing where it IS different enough that I can see why they did not want to call it CALs, but there ARE CALs inherently in what they are doing.

                            No audit worries, though, unless you are doing something crazy to steal the software. They have handy "lock out" features to make it obvious when you can't use something.

                            I've got my tin foil hat from @MattSpeller. Although Office365 is the safe way to do licensing from Microsoft in my opinion.

                            MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • MattSpellerM
                              MattSpeller @coliver
                              last edited by

                              @coliver said:

                              I've got my tin foil hat from @MattSpeller.

                              Only the best 4 ply man. Accept no substitute.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                Microsoft likes making new names to make things sound cool. Using Office 365 as a code name for subscription licensing is super confusing. But they love doing that.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1
                                • 2
                                • 3
                                • 4
                                • 3 / 4
                                • First post
                                  Last post