Homeschooling in the Tech Community
-
@tonyshowoff said:
We tried associating with home school organisations, but they're so full of religious weirdos who do things like reject the concept of gravity (so not just evolution), yes I'm serious, gravity. and also promote bizarre political beliefs, general anti-science and anti-intellectualism, etc and have absolutely no business teaching children anything. It's no wonder some people look down on home schooling, if your only experience are people like that.
wow, that seems completely counter intuitive.
-
@Dashrender There's also the "unschooling" types, which at face value, a lot of the unschooling things are interesting, but more often than not, in action seems to be a way just to avoid having to ever teach anything. The idea that "my child will learn to read/maths/whatever when s/he is ready and is interested to learn" doesn't seem quite logical, especially for potentially learning disabled students.
-
There are homeschooling weirdos out there. We never did a homeschooling group in our area due to the fact that none of them used real science. Yes I have heard the not believing in gravity thing before (again weirdos).
Unschooling is completely counter intuitive. Kids aren't just going to learn things out of thin air. They need guidance it's why kids with no discipline end up being pains
We didn't buy a single curriculum which was great for my son. However I did realize when he was about 10 that I forgot to teach him nursery rhymes and fairytales. But we ended up turning that into a huge history in literature project. He learned the origins of them and how they evolved to what they are today. Since most of the are very horrifying it was an awesome project for a 10 year old boy. It also taught him some great research skills. He uses that a lot these days working with NTG.
Homeschooling was one of the best things that we did for our son. I don't regret a day of it. Socialization is a bunch of bull puckey. You will never again have a place where you are secluded with all people of your own age group with almost identical life experiences. Real life is going out and meeting people and being able to have a conversation with a store cashier and understanding how to read people. Every day life is much more interesting than school is
-
@Dashrender said:
@tonyshowoff said:
We tried associating with home school organisations, but they're so full of religious weirdos who do things like reject the concept of gravity (so not just evolution), yes I'm serious, gravity. and also promote bizarre political beliefs, general anti-science and anti-intellectualism, etc and have absolutely no business teaching children anything. It's no wonder some people look down on home schooling, if your only experience are people like that.
wow, that seems completely counter intuitive.
I had a public school teacher who argued that gravity didn't exist too. Not limited to home schoolers.
I would guess that the vast majority of home schoolers are actually in this creepy category of "avoiding education" rather than trying to deliver a better one. It is sadly extremely common for someone to be home schooled only because parents don't want their own lack of understanding to be questioned. It gives the entire concept a bad name. And it is common enough that countries like Germany completely outlaw homeschooling because they fear what it can product (like the Hitler Youth - which did not come from homeschooling but which could rise again through it.)
-
@Minion-Queen said:
Unschooling is completely counter intuitive. Kids aren't just going to learn things out of thin air. They need guidance it's why kids with no discipline end up being pains
I think that it can work, it just won't work often. Kids who like to learn are going to do so. Formal schooling so often blocks learning to such an extent that it actually takes very little child motivation to far exceed the normal schooling system through unschooling. But it is very risky as you won't know if you have a child that will benefit from it until it is too late.
I essentially unschooled by going to a private school that taught almost nothing (and taught crazy science things like the earth did not rotate.) I learned nearly everything far ahead of when it was taught in school, if it ever was. By second grade I was past the teachers' own math educations and by fourth grade past their science and somewhere around fourth or fifth was on parity for English literature. This doesn't mean that I was advanced, most of them should not have been allowed to graduate from a public high school, but the point was that I liked to learn and taught myself even when I had a school actively trying to hold me back.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
I think that it can work, it just won't work often. Kids who like to learn are going to do so. Formal schooling so often blocks learning to such an extent that it actually takes very little child motivation to far exceed the normal schooling system through unschooling. But it is very risky as you won't know if you have a child that will benefit from it until it is too late.
I essentially unschooled by going to a private school that taught almost nothing (and taught crazy science things like the earth did not rotate.) I learned nearly everything far ahead of when it was taught in school, if it ever was.
But the only reason you sought out learning is because you already were "learning" even if not a lot. You were in a semi structured environment setup to learn (even if you really weren't).
A lot of unschooling parents just don't do anything. And expect their children will just learn to read etc. I have seen this done many times and now the what should be a highschool student barley reads and can't pass the GED.
These are not the creepy avoiding education due to religious reasons either. They tend to be the free spirit people.Now doing non-traditional schooling. Is a wonderful thing. Having a subject your child loves and being able to dig into every little aspect of it instead of learning what's on a test. Makes learning fun and very effective. But there was still some structure involved. No structure generally (not always) ='s lack of any learning.
-
I'm not super excited about the local school system here. I am excited about the chance to put my daughter though the local private school that is one of the top rated schools in the nation, but it comes with a massive....massive price. I haven't really considered home schooling. I see there are a few people who do it, how does it work? what is the day in the life of the home schooled? Does the parent just buy the books, teach, then administer tests? Does the state get involved?
-
@s.hackleman said:
I'm not super excited about the local school system here. I am excited about the chance to put my daughter though the local private school that is one of the top rated schools in the nation, but it comes with a massive....massive price. I haven't really considered home schooling. I see there are a few people who do it, how does it work? what is the day in the life of the home schooled? Does the parent just buy the books, teach, then administer tests? Does the state get involved?
Well these questions have many answers. I would be happy to talk to you if you want. You can reach out to me via PM and I would be happy to answer questions.
As far as your state getting involved each state is very different in the laws.
-
@Minion-Queen I am sure a little bit of time on ye ol' Google would serve me better. I was just looking for big picture overview. You have put this in my queue of possible ways to educate my daughter, as before I had not even considered it. She is 5 weeks old at this point, so I have plenty of time.
-
We don't do any tests here. Tests are one of the things that we feel is wrong with the public school system. We teach only for our kids to learn, not for them to "rate" against others. We want them to know the material, not memorize facts. There is a reason why I feel that SUNY Empire is one of the best universities around - they don't do tests either and only build portfolios. It's much harder not having tests, but when you want to really learn you don't use tests. Tests are an avoidance of education.
Finland, which is now the top rates public school system in the world, does not use tests either.
-
Check out Grove Social's nascent home schooling community too...
-
@Minion-Queen said:
But the only reason you sought out learning is because you already were "learning" even if not a lot. You were in a semi structured environment setup to learn (even if you really weren't).
That's a big leap. I wanted to learn, school made me do other things (ride buses, sit quietly, wait while students who couldn't count learned their numbers, etc.) I liked learning before I went to school. I liked learning less when there.
-
@Minion-Queen said:
A lot of unschooling parents just don't do anything. And expect their children will just learn to read etc. I have seen this done many times and now the what should be a highschool student barley reads and can't pass the GED.
Reading is one of those things that just has to be taught. It's needed so that students can access all other learning resources.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Minion-Queen said:
But the only reason you sought out learning is because you already were "learning" even if not a lot. You were in a semi structured environment setup to learn (even if you really weren't).
That's a big leap. I wanted to learn, school made me do other things (ride buses, sit quietly, wait while students who couldn't count learned their numbers, etc.) I liked learning before I went to school. I liked learning less when there.
I'd consider you on the more rare side Scott - most kids really probably don't care about learning, at least not like we traditionally understand it.
-
You have lots of time then! Homeschooling was awesome for my son. We were able to go where we wanted, tons of real life skills and we went at his pace. Sometimes that meant that he was way ahead on something and way behind on others. Because we just took time off as we wanted instead of doing traditional school vacations he graduated very early at 15. He has since still continued to do school VERY non-traditionally. He is learning German because he wants to, guitar, keyboard, IT Stuff (he works with NTG as an intern doing tons of research and working in our server lab). He has worked with his father on his business. Taken care of his grandparents, helped keep our household organized. Is on our church worship team. Spent a year with us in the mission field in Africa where he "homeschooled native students" and learned 2 languages.
@scottalanmiller and @Dominica are able to live outside of the country and just go along as normal with travel all over the place and not skip a beat.
There are so many more options out there these days. You can do the complete thing by your self, order a full curriculum package, do online schooling where you are part of it but there is a teacher and someone to get support from.
I could go on and on for hours about the benefits. Of course your child could drive you batty as well
but that is the joy of being a parent. -
@scottalanmiller said:
We don't do any tests here. Tests are one of the things that we feel is wrong with the public school system. We teach only for our kids to learn, not for them to "rate" against others. We want them to know the material, not memorize facts. There is a reason why I feel that SUNY Empire is one of the best universities around - they don't do tests either and only build portfolios. It's much harder not having tests, but when you want to really learn you don't use tests. Tests are an avoidance of education.
Finland, which is now the top rates public school system in the world, does not use tests either.
How do you gauge comprehension if not for testing? I'm certainly not saying you're wrong to say testing is bad - I'm a horrible test taker - I'm just curious how you gauge their understanding.
-
@Dashrender said:
I'd consider you on the more rare side Scott - most kids really probably don't care about learning, at least not like we traditionally understand it.
Is that true? Most kids love to learn. It's the natural human state. Schools work exceptionally hard to beat the love of learning out of them at an early age. You don't have many kids to observe who haven't been to school to see what a love of learning looks like when not curtailed by "schools."
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
I'd consider you on the more rare side Scott - most kids really probably don't care about learning, at least not like we traditionally understand it.
Is that true? Most kids love to learn. It's the natural human state. Schools work exceptionally hard to beat the love of learning out of them at an early age. You don't have many kids to observe who haven't been to school to see what a love of learning looks like when not curtailed by "schools."
Kids love to learn how to spell words? and the history of the world - I'd bet not. If instead they were able to lead where the learning goes by their own interest with some of that needed information tossed in there, then maybe..
-
We continued to do traditional testing methods. Partly because we lived in a state that required it for homeschoolers. But it was also a good gauge for us to keep us on track. We just tested once a year (unlike public schools that test constantly) this kept us on track for the most part. But as I said I missed some culturally acceptable things like nursery rhymes and fairytales. Not a huge deal but if you don't have those small bits of information you can miss things later on.
-
@Dashrender said:
How do you gauge comprehension if not for testing? I'm certainly not saying you're wrong to say testing is bad - I'm a horrible test taker - I'm just curious how you gauge their understanding.
Testing doesn't gauge comprehension either. That's something specifically missing in normal school settings. Tests only test memorization (useless) and test taking ability (useful, but not in good settings.) Tests are used to avoid gauging comprehension. Tests are easy, figuring out what people know is hard.
It's a lot like interviewing. We all know that simple, memorization style questions in interviews are the norm, but we also know that they show almost nothing and cause good people to not get jobs and bad people to get them because they test random trivial memorization and not understanding of the material.
Just like in job situations, you can best gauge understanding through conversation and portfolio review. Anyone can tell you that the Spanish Armada was defeated in 1588. That's a useless fact drilled into every student for no reason. What students can't tell you is why the Spanish Armada was important, why it was the bane of the British, why the defeat was so important to world history and who the main players were and what their motivations were or what we can learn about people, events and history because of it. In school the defeat of the Spanish Armada was literally relegated to a single date to memorize. One of the most important events in modern history and no one even knows what it was.
