How many of you...
-
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@wls-itguy said in How many of you...:
@dbeato said in How many of you...:
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@wls-itguy said in How many of you...:
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@wls-itguy said in How many of you...:
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
I got a really nice email from someone that checked in over there last week, saw the drama, and canceled his
World trip.What did I miss? I really like going to Austin though
They deactivated both @DustinB3403 and me. We don't have accounts there anymore.
is there a thread on this? I need some interesting reading.
@dbeato made one.
Yes, I made one.
Here or there? Not finding anything but I'm not really looking all that hard
There, here isn't the right place to discuss it. Especially as a major part of their complaint was people talking about them in public, elsewhere. They are really anal about being talked about in any place where they can't selectively delete the parts of the conversation that they don't like. (Which is how I got put into perma moderation in the first place - I reported a rules and ethics breach and they immediately cut off my account in retaliation.)
It would seem that
is attempting to bash my right to free speech, and as such I should sue them over their attempt to trample my rights.Anyone down for a game of let's close down
?That's not what free speech means.
If they are attempting to silence what I have to say by sending C&D's to other communities who have members who talk about content that may be directly related to their antics that is an infringement of free speech.
-
Went on there today saw the first 2 posts on my feed and couldn't be bothered to even look at them or go further lol
-
@hobbit666 said in How many of you...:
Went on there today saw the first 2 posts on my feed and couldn't be bothered to even look at them or go further lol
If the inane questions don't drive you away, and the obviously malicious recommendations, then the shame of the quiz will do it, lol.
-
This sums up the situation
-
@floridaman said in How many of you...:
This sums up the situationForcing other communities to not discuss the circus that is going on in their communities is an abuse of free speech.
-
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
-
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
You would, but it's not related to free speech.
-
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
You would, but it's not related to free speech.
We've been down this road with @DustinB3403 before. He has no idea what things actually mean.
-
@jaredbusch said in How many of you...:
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
You would, but it's not related to free speech.
We've been down this road with @DustinB3403 before. He has no idea what things actually mean.
Free speech is a discussion of public domain, just like a new paper or whatever other medium you choose. So much like a new paper, what is posted there and would be visible by someone walking down the road (randomly browsing a website) is public domain.
With that, I'd said the conversation we're having and dealing with lately would fall into "protected by free speech" category.
-
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@jaredbusch said in How many of you...:
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
You would, but it's not related to free speech.
We've been down this road with @DustinB3403 before. He has no idea what things actually mean.
Free speech is a discussion of public domain, just like a new paper or whatever other medium you choose. So much like a new paper, what is posted there and would be visible by someone walking down the road (randomly browsing a website) is public domain.
That's not a good example since a newspaper is definitely not public domain. Public domain is a reference to ownership of the content, not a reference to where it can be viewed. Where something can be viewed is of no consequence to a discussion of freedom of speech. That is not a factor in that in any way.
A newspaper, unless it is published with tax dollars by the government, is not public in any sense. It is privately owned, is not covered by freedom laws other than its own right to publish, and can choose to whom it can be sold. It is covered by copyright.
-
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
With that, I'd said the conversation we're having and dealing with lately would fall into "protected by free speech" category.
It does not. People are not bound by freedom of speech, the government is. Freedom of speech keeps the government from censoring you, it doesn't affect citizens. It's a right given to citizens to protect them from the government.
-
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
It's a right given to citizens to protect them from the government.
" It's a right given to citizens to protect them from the government."....
BAM!!! Bill of rights. Summed up. One sentence. -
Last time I logged in I had a new
up from SAM, so I've apparently missed something. -
@flaxking said in How many of you...:
Last time I logged in I had a new
up from SAM, so I've apparently missed something.Yep, you missed it
-
@wls-itguy said in How many of you...:
So how long before SodiumSuite can do all of what
can do?Is there already any reason to be using
software vs other free alternative? -
@flaxking said in How many of you...:
@wls-itguy said in How many of you...:
So how long before SodiumSuite can do all of what
can do?Is there already any reason to be using
software vs other free alternative?Not that I know Of.
