old MSP wants to know what they did wrong
-
@Mike-Davis said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
I have a running list. I have screen shots. I have photos of the server literally being held together with duct tape.
I need this shared.....
I've seen people use rubber bands and scotch tap to fit an SSD to the original 3.5" winchester, but duct tape.. come on.
-
@IRJ said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Mike-Davis said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
I have a running list. I have screen shots. I have photos of the server literally being held together with duct tape.
Who needs the "cloud" when you have duct tape?
Who needs a server at that point.... or ethernet clips, or drive bays or anything.
-
Some of the stuff, the tech could say that the owner didn't want to spend money on a new server, so he couldn't do anything.
Other stuff, like using the everyone group instead of the domain users group when creating the main file share there is just no excuse for except for incompetence.
He probably did this because some people are logging in under domain accounts and some are local accounts and couldn't figure out why the share wasn't working.
-
@DustinB3403 said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Mike-Davis said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
I have a running list. I have screen shots. I have photos of the server literally being held together with duct tape.
I need this shared.....
I've seen people use rubber bands and scotch tap to fit an SSD to the original 3.5" winchester, but duct tape.. come on.
As much as I want to see the issues, he probably shouldn't share a report even if information is redacted. Because if the company name somehow gets out, they can be hacked in about 10 seconds lol.
-
@DustinB3403 said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@IRJ said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Mike-Davis said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
I have a running list. I have screen shots. I have photos of the server literally being held together with duct tape.
Who needs the "cloud" when you have duct tape?
Who needs a server at that point.... or ethernet clips, or drive bays or anything.
Not me, just a block of wood and enough duct tape to hold the motherboard down and the hard drive up.
-
@IRJ said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@DustinB3403 said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Mike-Davis said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
I have a running list. I have screen shots. I have photos of the server literally being held together with duct tape.
I need this shared.....
I've seen people use rubber bands and scotch tap to fit an SSD to the original 3.5" winchester, but duct tape.. come on.
As much as I want to see the issues, he probably shouldn't share a report even if information is redacted. Because if the company name somehow gets out, they can be hacked in about 10 seconds lol.
True... True... But I'd settle for the picture of the server held together with Duct tape.
-
@IRJ said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
As much as I want to see the issues, he probably shouldn't share a report even if information is redacted. Because if the company name somehow gets out, they can be hacked in about 10 seconds lol.
The ironic thing is that the owner was so concerned about security that he doesn't have any wifi in the place. -Good thing too, the guy probably would have secured it with WEP, if anything.
-
@Mike-Davis and what exactly is wrong with WEP?!
(sarcasm boys)
-
@dafyre said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
But I'd settle for the picture of the server held together with Duct tape.
@dafyre Here you go:
-
@DustinB3403 said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
Might as well have built the server using a pizza box...
I've seen that before...
-
@Mike-Davis said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@scottalanmiller said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@travisdh1 finally someone who actually knows what a pizza box is in IT!
OK this begs for an explanation.
It was a nickname for the shape of it. I think SGI had a box nicknamed the toaster around that same time.
As did Amiga
Well NewTek, actually. -
@Mike-Davis said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@scottalanmiller said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@travisdh1 finally someone who actually knows what a pizza box is in IT!
OK this begs for an explanation.
It was a nickname for the shape of it. I think SGI had a box nicknamed the toaster around that same time.
Yes they did, the O2. I've been very tempted to try picking up a working model on ebay.
-
@travisdh1 said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Mike-Davis said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@scottalanmiller said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@travisdh1 finally someone who actually knows what a pizza box is in IT!
OK this begs for an explanation.
It was a nickname for the shape of it. I think SGI had a box nicknamed the toaster around that same time.
Yes they did, the O2. I've been very tempted to try picking up a working model on ebay.
Some old school stuff right there.
-
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@scottalanmiller said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
That's the "doesn't know what a pizza box" problem that I was referring to. 1U servers are not pizza boxes, they are not square. THat's a new thing that people who don't know Sparcstations, but have overheard people use the term, mistakenly call them now. A 1U should never be called a pizza box.
This seems like IT elitism for the sake of elitism. Sure the original pizzabox was the Sparcstation - the second gen pizzabox was a 1U rackmount server.
If that was the intention, then that would be fine. But a repeated accidental misuse of a term is not the same thing at all. Being knowledgeable and correct is never elitism. Calling a 1U a pizzabox is just an alternative fact. People heard the term, didn't understand it and wanted to sound cool and it got repeated. Exactly the same as blade servers. Lots of people call 1U servers that, too. And it is always wrong. People know one thing and want to use buzz words so apply them to anything that they see. Cloud, virtual, etc.
-
@scottalanmiller said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@scottalanmiller said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
That's the "doesn't know what a pizza box" problem that I was referring to. 1U servers are not pizza boxes, they are not square. THat's a new thing that people who don't know Sparcstations, but have overheard people use the term, mistakenly call them now. A 1U should never be called a pizza box.
This seems like IT elitism for the sake of elitism. Sure the original pizzabox was the Sparcstation - the second gen pizzabox was a 1U rackmount server.
If that was the intention, then that would be fine.
how do you know it wasn't the intention? I'd never seen a Sparcstation until I saw what were already ancient pictures of them, like the one above.
The first time I heard of a pizzabox was in a datacenter talking about IBM 1U servers. Right or wrong, the term has two meanings today.
-
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
The first time I heard of a pizzabox was in a datacenter talking about IBM 1U servers. Right or wrong, the term has two meanings today.
Just like cloud has two meanings, and blades do. We work in IT, wrong is wrong. There isn't room for sloppy. Just using terms mistakenly doesn't make it okay.
You can say it has two meanings, but where does thinking like that stop? Soon you can say anything and we have no terminology for our field. Just because lots of people repeat something incorrectly doesn't make it okay nor does it make it a term for that thing.
-
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
how do you know it wasn't the intention?
I've heard it misused directly many times where it was obvious someone was repeating something that they didn't understand. Can I know that all people everywhere heard the term through the grapevine in that way? No. Is it a very, very safe assumption? I think so.
-
@scottalanmiller said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
how do you know it wasn't the intention?
I've heard it misused directly many times where it was obvious someone was repeating something that they didn't understand. Can I know that all people everywhere heard the term through the grapevine in that way? No. Is it a very, very safe assumption? I think so.
so when those people were misusing it - did they mean 1u rackmount box? or were they using it to just talk about a server, or a PC or some other random piece of gear?
-
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
The first time I heard of a pizzabox was in a datacenter talking about IBM 1U servers.
And? Most people here cloud computing and are told it just means "someone else's computer", which isn't even slightly what it means. Tons and tons of people are told that 1U servers are blades because the person speaking doesn't even know that actual blades exist, that doesn't make it right. My point above is that tons of people call 1U servers pizza boxes. I never disputed that it is used that way, my point was that it was wrong because they were taking a term that means something (a style of box that looks like the ones pictures, nothing like a 1U) and applying it just like blade or cloud, to whatever they had in front of them instead of what the term means. If you had a machine that was formed like those but wasn't a sparcstation and used the term intentionally to imply it was of the same factor, yes, that would be valid. Just repeating a misused term or trying to use something without knowing what it is is just wrong, however.
-
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@scottalanmiller said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
@Dashrender said in old MSP wants to know what they did wrong:
how do you know it wasn't the intention?
I've heard it misused directly many times where it was obvious someone was repeating something that they didn't understand. Can I know that all people everywhere heard the term through the grapevine in that way? No. Is it a very, very safe assumption? I think so.
so when those people were misusing it - did they mean 1u rackmount box? or were they using it to just talk about a server, or a PC or some other random piece of gear?
The standard misuse is the same standard misuse of blade - 1u rackmounts. Because they are common and people assume that there must be nicknames for them so they assume anything that they hear refers to that. Your example from your datacenter is exactly the case I have talked about for years and years. It's not a "general misuse", it's this specific case of calling 1U servers terms reserved for other machines.
