ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Ubiquiti Switches

    IT Discussion
    17
    140
    52.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Deleted74295D
      Deleted74295 Banned
      last edited by

      But if Ubiquiti make great switches & APs, why not do both @Carnival-Boy ?

      The HP switches are "Ok" they are not bad or good. They just work. So this is a tester but if they do everything needed, why not.

      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
        last edited by

        @Carnival-Boy said:

        Well, if HP make great switches but terrible APs and Ubiquiti make great APs, maybe their switches aren't so great?

        It's a risk, of course, but just because HP has a consistency problem does not suggest that Ubiquiti does. Can't hold HP's failings against UBNT.

        We have UBNT switches, APs, and routers and not one issue yet. We've also used Netgear a lot and love them too.

        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • wirestyle22W
          wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @Carnival-Boy said:

          Well, if HP make great switches but terrible APs and Ubiquiti make great APs, maybe their switches aren't so great?

          It's a risk, of course, but just because HP has a consistency problem does not suggest that Ubiquiti does. Can't hold HP's failings against UBNT.

          We have UBNT switches, APs, and routers and not one issue yet. We've also used Netgear a lot and love them too.

          How long have you been using UBNT?

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
            last edited by

            @wirestyle22 said:

            How long have you been using UBNT?

            Routers and APs, over a year now. Maybe two? Switches, just a few months.

            wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • wirestyle22W
              wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said:

              @wirestyle22 said:

              How long have you been using UBNT?

              Routers and APs, over a year now. Maybe two? Switches, just a few months.

              Seems like they are a good middle ground for SMBs who need higher level equipment at a lower price

              scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                last edited by

                @wirestyle22 said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @wirestyle22 said:

                How long have you been using UBNT?

                Routers and APs, over a year now. Maybe two? Switches, just a few months.

                Seems like they are a good middle ground for SMBs who need higher level equipment at a lower price

                Yes, they are going after the space that Netgear ProSafe used to have and doing it even better. Netgear still has switching options that UBNT does not (yet.) But UBNT has much higher end APs, at lower prices, with a broader lineup than Prosafe. And UBNT has enterprise routers rather than SMB all in ones like Prosafe. Netgear left the serious AP and router market many years ago leaving switching and their ReadyNAS storage as their key business products. UBNT has stepped into the vacuum and makes the AP and routing products that Netgear should always have made. And the two compete in the switching space.

                UBNT also glommed onto the Meraki model of cloud management and went after them as well. So UBNT has fallen into a spot where they are displacing Netgear and Cisco heavily and Meraki completely.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C
                  Carnival Boy @Deleted74295
                  last edited by

                  @Breffni-Potter said:

                  But if Ubiquiti make great switches & APs, why not do both @Carnival-Boy ?

                  The HP switches are "Ok" they are not bad or good. They just work. So this is a tester but if they do everything needed, why not.

                  No reason. I'm not saying don't get them, I'm just wondering why you picked them as opposed to the UK's more popular switches? Is there any specific thing you're after, or is it just a "why not?" kind of strategy (and there's nothing wrong with that).

                  scottalanmillerS Deleted74295D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
                    last edited by

                    @Carnival-Boy said:

                    @Breffni-Potter said:

                    But if Ubiquiti make great switches & APs, why not do both @Carnival-Boy ?

                    The HP switches are "Ok" they are not bad or good. They just work. So this is a tester but if they do everything needed, why not.

                    No reason. I'm not saying don't get them, I'm just wondering why you picked them as opposed to the UK's more popular switches? Is there any specific thing you're after, or is it just a "why not?" kind of strategy (and there's nothing wrong with that).

                    Maybe he's looking to be a pioneer 🙂

                    Somebody has to be the first really using any given product in a market.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @wirestyle22
                      last edited by

                      @wirestyle22 said:

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @wirestyle22 said:

                      How long have you been using UBNT?

                      Routers and APs, over a year now. Maybe two? Switches, just a few months.

                      Seems like they are a good middle ground for SMBs who need higher level equipment at a lower price

                      How much of that lower end price is the vendor just charging high prices because they can?

                      It unfortunate, many people equate price with value. But we look at something like the ERL at $90 and compared to the Cisco ASA for $450 the ERL seems like a cheap consumer thing, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • Deleted74295D
                        Deleted74295 Banned @Carnival Boy
                        last edited by

                        @Carnival-Boy said:

                        Is there any specific thing you're after, or is it just a "why not?" kind of strategy (and there's nothing wrong with that).

                        I like the Ubiquiti model of paying a lower price, because they don't have the sales/marketing/support structure of HP/Cisco.

                        Why pay a premium for average support? If the box is dead, get a new one. If it's a config, then I'll fix it 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • C
                          Carnival Boy
                          last edited by

                          I've only ever bought Netgear switches. For no real reason other than the first job I had used Netgear switches and I've never seen any reason to change. I've no real idea if they are good or not, other than the ones I've used have been very reliable.

                          Netgear don't seem to spend a lot on sales and marketing either. I'm basing this statement on the fact that I've never been cold-called by Netgear whereas in the last 10 years I've been cold-called by Cisco 5,654 times.

                          How do Netgear compare with Ubiquiti in terms of cost?

                          JaredBuschJ J 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JaredBuschJ
                            JaredBusch @Carnival Boy
                            last edited by JaredBusch

                            @Carnival-Boy said:

                            I've only ever bought Netgear switches. For no real reason other than the first job I had used Netgear switches and I've never seen any reason to change. I've no real idea if they are good or not, other than the ones I've used have been very reliable.

                            Netgear don't seem to spend a lot on sales and marketing either. I'm basing this statement on the fact that I've never been cold-called by Netgear whereas in the last 10 years I've been cold-called by Cisco 5,654 times.

                            How do Netgear compare with Ubiquiti in terms of cost?

                            Similar from what I have seen. Less robust from what what I have seen also, but not by much.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • Deleted74295D
                              Deleted74295 Banned
                              last edited by Deleted74295

                              @Carnival-Boy
                              Netgear boxes have given me a bit of grief. I like the dumb un-managed ones, but the managed switches & a few other boxes have been a bit of a mare.

                              Netgear do marketing, a lot of marketing. Good grief. Even on something like google ads.

                              scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
                                last edited by

                                @Breffni-Potter said:

                                Netgear do marketing, a lot of marketing. Good grief. Even on something like google ads.

                                I never see their ads, that's weird.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
                                  last edited by

                                  @Breffni-Potter said:

                                  Netgear boxes have given me a bit of grief. I like the dumb un-managed ones, but the managed switches & a few other boxes have been a bit of a mare.

                                  We never use their managed, but their unmanaged and smart have been very good.

                                  hobbit666H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • brianlittlejohnB
                                    brianlittlejohn
                                    last edited by

                                    I don't either

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • J
                                      Jason Banned @Carnival Boy
                                      last edited by

                                      @Carnival-Boy said:

                                      I've never been cold-called by Netgear whereas in the last 10 years I've been cold-called by Cisco 5,654 times.

                                      We don't get cold called by Cisco. There enterprise stuff isn't really something they cold call on, where they make their money is the SMB lines anyway. Where SMBs think they need Cisco but get sold absolute junk with a Cisco logo on it. The SMB lines at Cisco has done them a major disservice in brand image while making them a lot of money.

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • hobbit666H
                                        hobbit666 @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        @Breffni-Potter said:

                                        Netgear boxes have given me a bit of grief. I like the dumb un-managed ones, but the managed switches & a few other boxes have been a bit of a mare.

                                        We never use their managed, but their unmanaged and smart have been very good.

                                        We have a few M4100 switches and have been rock solid for a while now. But thinking of switching to Edge Switches on the next purchase.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @Jason
                                          last edited by

                                          @Jason said:

                                          @Carnival-Boy said:

                                          I've never been cold-called by Netgear whereas in the last 10 years I've been cold-called by Cisco 5,654 times.

                                          We don't get cold called by Cisco. There enterprise stuff isn't really something they cold call on, where they make their money is the SMB lines anyway. Where SMBs think they need Cisco but get sold absolute junk with a Cisco logo on it. The SMB lines at Cisco has done them a major disservice in brand image while making them a lot of money.

                                          Yes, it's made Cisco look like a total joke. Even those of us who have never used it outside of the enterprise hear the name and laugh. The issues with their UCS stuff didn't help them any, either.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • wrx7mW
                                            wrx7m
                                            last edited by

                                            I just purchased my ERX and an AP-AC-LR for home. It was troublesome to setup at first until I realized that eth0 was meant for WAN (I was trying to setup eth1) Once I got that, everything fell into place and I am super happy so far. Got zoneedit for DDNS setup and the AP is using the POE passthrough. This setup blows my old Asus RN66U out of the water. And it is cheaper.

                                            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 4 / 7
                                            • First post
                                              Last post