ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    IE zero-day Fix

    IT Discussion
    9
    30
    3.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      technobabble @Bill Kindle
      last edited by

      @Bill-Kindle said:

      @technobabble said:

      What's IE? Just kidding. By the way if users don't use IE and wait for normal W8.1.1 updates are they vulnerable still?

      It affected all IE versions, including 11.

      I got that @Bill-Kindle, but I wanted to know if they don't use IE are they still vulnerable? Many of my clients are residential or break/fix business clients and most don't use IE.

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @technobabble
        last edited by

        @technobabble said:

        @Bill-Kindle said:

        @technobabble said:

        What's IE? Just kidding. By the way if users don't use IE and wait for normal W8.1.1 updates are they vulnerable still?

        It affected all IE versions, including 11.

        I got that @Bill-Kindle, but I wanted to know if they don't use IE are they still vulnerable? Many of my clients are residential or break/fix business clients and most don't use IE.

        The risk is IE specific as I understand it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          technobabble
          last edited by

          Good to know...working on blog/newsletter stuff this weekend and wanted to be current and correct!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            image.jpg

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • alexntgA
              alexntg @tfl
              last edited by

              @tfl said:

              @Dashrender said:

              Hold the phone.. XP's listed in there.

              Indeed - this is most generous of Microsoft.

              Sets an interesting precedent for the future but I think they did the good thing here!

              That's a terrible precedent to set. Now XP users are going to want more patches the next time something happens.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @alexntg
                last edited by

                @alexntg said:

                @tfl said:

                @Dashrender said:

                Hold the phone.. XP's listed in there.

                Indeed - this is most generous of Microsoft.

                Sets an interesting precedent for the future but I think they did the good thing here!

                That's a terrible precedent to set. Now XP users are going to want more patches the next time something happens.

                Wasn't the patch to IE, not to XP though? If not, then I agree.

                Bill KindleB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Bill KindleB
                  Bill Kindle @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @alexntg said:

                  @tfl said:

                  @Dashrender said:

                  Hold the phone.. XP's listed in there.

                  Indeed - this is most generous of Microsoft.

                  Sets an interesting precedent for the future but I think they did the good thing here!

                  That's a terrible precedent to set. Now XP users are going to want more patches the next time something happens.

                  Wasn't the patch to IE, not to XP though? If not, then I agree.

                  To my knowledge it was only IE, not XP. The versions of IE affected were predominate on XP though, which I why I think a lot of people are getting it confused thinking it's an XP update when it's not.

                  DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender @Bill Kindle
                    last edited by

                    @Bill-Kindle said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @alexntg said:

                    @tfl said:

                    @Dashrender said:

                    Hold the phone.. XP's listed in there.

                    Indeed - this is most generous of Microsoft.

                    Sets an interesting precedent for the future but I think they did the good thing here!

                    That's a terrible precedent to set. Now XP users are going to want more patches the next time something happens.

                    Wasn't the patch to IE, not to XP though? If not, then I agree.

                    To my knowledge it was only IE, not XP. The versions of IE affected were predominate on XP though, which I why I think a lot of people are getting it confused thinking it's an XP update when it's not.

                    I wouldn't call it predominate. It affected all versions from IE 6 - 11. So three of those versions are on XP (6-8, 3 of them), but the rest all all available on Windows 7 (8-11, 4 of them).

                    I was really hoping MS wasn't going to provide an IE fix for XP, but perhaps the code was identical for XP's version of IE 8 as it was for Windows 7's version of IE 8. If this is the case, XP will continue to get IE patches until 2020 when Windows 7 is force ably retired.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      One would hop that they would only not provide new patches. Not actively block them from the platform. I would expect MS Office to keep getting update. For example.

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        One would hop that they would only not provide new patches. Not actively block them from the platform. I would expect MS Office to keep getting update. For example.

                        Office? I guess you mean Office 2007 or newer since Office 2003 was EOL'ed with XP. To that end, I agree, Office 2007 updates should definitely run on XP or there should be hell to pay. But since you can't get support for XP any longer I could see MS saying - if it doesn't work, we're sorry we can't help you until you are on a supported base platform as XP is no longer considered a supported platform for Office 2007 or 2010.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 2 / 2
                        • First post
                          Last post