ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    topic icons

    Platform and Category Issues
    nodebb
    11
    152
    42.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A
      Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
      last edited by Alex Sage

      This post is deleted!
      scottalanmillerS Minion QueenM art_of_shredA 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
        last edited by

        @anonymous said:

        @scottalanmiller said:

        It's confusing here because I'm here in an NTG capacity handling the infrastructure as GS hires NTG to do that and I'm the one that does that from NTG. That causes the big confusion.

        No, it's confusing because the New York State Department of State has no business registered for GroveSocial

        They would not have NTG either as NTG is a Delaware company, which is where most companies register in the US. Registering in NY would be weird, even for companies HQ'd there.

        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Minion QueenM
          Minion Queen Banned @Alex Sage
          last edited by

          @anonymous Not a NY company. Why would I do that? That would be crazy. Our tax paperwork is in process as we are expanding and moving things around.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • art_of_shredA
            art_of_shred Banned @Alex Sage
            last edited by

            @anonymous said:

            @scottalanmiller said:

            It's confusing here because I'm here in an NTG capacity handling the infrastructure as GS hires NTG to do that and I'm the one that does that from NTG. That causes the big confusion.

            No, it's confusing because the New York State Department of State has no listing for GroveSocial

            ...cause it's not a NYS based company.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A
              Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              This post is deleted!
              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                last edited by

                @anonymous weird, have never seen that. I suppose that is because NTG does business in the state. ML does not.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Minion QueenM
                  Minion Queen Banned
                  last edited by

                  And your point is? That is NTG...... Not GroveSocial......

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Minion Queen
                    last edited by

                    @Minion-Queen said:

                    And your point is? That is NTG...... Not GroveSocial......

                    his point was that I said that NTG would not show up in NY either, but it does as a foreign company.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A
                      Alex Sage
                      last edited by

                      This post is deleted!
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Minion QueenM
                        Minion Queen Banned
                        last edited by

                        Grovesocial/Mangolassi are also not corporations.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          That would make a difference, too. NTG is a full Delaware Class C.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            Just did the first post with all large images uploaded to RS instead of IG. Wow is it fast!

                            http://mangolassi.it/topic/7714/testing-elastix-4-rc3-on-the-scale-hc3

                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              This post is deleted!
                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • A
                                Alex Sage
                                last edited by Alex Sage

                                This post is deleted!
                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                                  last edited by

                                  @anonymous said:

                                  @scottalanmiller And I bet it works better globally as well.

                                  That's the idea, Akamai has the best global CDN in the business. RS and MS both use them, for example. They've been the CDN leader since the idea first started, I believe. I'm excited to be on them, just hope we can get code working to make it all easy and transparent. But being on CF has always been the long term goal, just pushing it faster now.

                                  In theory, faster image resolution means better SEO rankings as well, we hope.

                                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JaredBuschJ
                                    JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    I'm excited to be on them, just hope we can get code working to make it all easy and transparent.

                                    The best thing to do would be to grab the imgur plugin and fork it for another service.

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                                      last edited by

                                      @JaredBusch said:

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      I'm excited to be on them, just hope we can get code working to make it all easy and transparent.

                                      The best thing to do would be to grab the imgur plugin and fork it for another service.

                                      Already doing that 🙂 I've got the code from the old CF project too. Hoping that as I got through it that it is pretty obvious what needs to be done. I'll get it up on Github, too. I'm sure lots of people would like to see this working.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DashrenderD
                                        Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        @anonymous said:

                                        All I am requesting it that we don't use images from other sites, as we are using there bandwidth, and that's not fair or the right thing to do.

                                        I don't agree that it isn't fair or right, however I agree and have relayed to Danielle that there is an important perception there regardless and that for that reason, and for control of content and performance, working hard to get everything that we use reasonably over to Cloud Files where we get the best performance, insight and control for the long term. So we are working towards what I believe to be what you want.

                                        Interesting that you don't see the use of someone else's resources as inherently (bad seems like to strong a word here). Costing someone else money while they gain nothing from that expense just seems wrong.

                                        At least with Youtube embedded links, Youtube still shows ads and therefore they get revenue from the view.

                                        J scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • J
                                          Jason Banned @Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @Dashrender said:

                                          Interesting that you don't see the use of someone else's resources as inherently (bad seems like to strong a word here). Costing someone else money while they gain nothing from that expense just seems wrong.

                                          At least with Youtube embedded links, Youtube still shows ads and therefore they get revenue from the view.

                                          Youtube was designed for embededing as well. Those images were meant to be viewed as their whole creation (the website design) the way the content creator intended. Just using one part of it rips it out of the context it was meant to be viewed in.

                                          DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @Jason
                                            last edited by

                                            @Jason said:

                                            @Dashrender said:

                                            Interesting that you don't see the use of someone else's resources as inherently (bad seems like to strong a word here). Costing someone else money while they gain nothing from that expense just seems wrong.

                                            At least with Youtube embedded links, Youtube still shows ads and therefore they get revenue from the view.

                                            Youtube was designed for embededing as well. Those images were meant to be viewed as their whole creation (the website design) the way the content creator intended. Just using one part of it rips it out of the context it was meant to be viewed in.

                                            You lost me there. In the first sentence I completely agree - Youtube designed the videos to play embedded through nearly any website - their whole message would remain intact.

                                            Clearly that is not the case with most static images. The images usually enhance something else that is on that page.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 5 / 8
                                            • First post
                                              Last post