Hyper-V and deleting Snapshots
-
@DustinB3403 said:
I'm not trying to confuse the two, simply trying to explain what I see.
And trying to understand the process of Hyper-V snapshot creation.
So the baseline is Hyper-V will create an original snapshot (when the vm is brand new), and everything else afterwards is a delta change snapshot.
Hyper-V then uses the 2 most current snapshots to run the VM? Is that correct?
or Hyper-V uses the original snapshot, and the most current to run the VM?
Hyper-V uses all of them, the same with VMWare and Xen. It only writes changes to the most recent one but it looks at all of them to read data.
-
@coliver So then it would be smart to regularly merge the Hyper-V snapshots to free up space on your server.
And that seems really odd IMO. . .
-
Not quite... Because you can take a Snapshot of a Snapshot... (Hyper-V calls these Checkpoints)...
So if you have multiple snapshots anytime a READ occurs... It looks for it in the Current snapshot file... If it can't find it there, then it goes up to the previous snapshot file... and then it repeats that until it gets back to the original VHDX (I've heard some folks call this walking up the chain, lol).
Any time a WRITE occurs, it happens to the current snapshot file.
Edit: It is my understanding this is how pretty much all Hypervisors work with snapshots, please somebody correct me if I am wrong!
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@coliver So then it would be smart to regularly merge the Hyper-V snapshots to free up space on your server.
And that seems really odd IMO. . .
Right... the same as VMWare and I am pretty sure Xen.
Regardless of Hypervisor it is generally considered a good idea to merge your snapshots (or checkpoints) when you no longer need them. As has been said they shouldn't be used as backup there are much better tools for that.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
I keep 4 backups (4 weeks worth of delta).
This is where you are wrong. If you were only keeping 4 delta's, you would have no way to restore.
VM disk file: bob.vhdx - 100GB
Click snapshot button: bob_s1.ss - 0GB-XXGB growing as the system is used bob.,vhdx stops getting wrote to.
Click snapshot again: bob_2.ss - 0GB-XXGB growing as the system is used bob_1 stops getting wrote to.Click delete on snapshot 2 and it merges the changes back into snapshot 1.
Click delete on snaphot 1 and it merges the changes back into bob.vhdx.bob_s1 and bob_s2 are deltas of things changed since they were created. they are useless for a backup or recovery.
When you use a backup tool, it makes a snapshot so that the bob.vhdx is no longer being changed in order to let the it be copied off. The backup tools generally then merge the snapshot back in after it is done copying the core virtual disk.
Thus, there is no possible way that you have valid backups as you describe them. As you use a valid tool to perform your backups, I am sure you actually do have good backups. Just your understanding of the process or ability to describe it is what is lacking.
-
@JaredBusch He's using NAUBackup for his backups... I think it was him that mentioned that in another thread.
-
@dafyre said:
@JaredBusch He's using NAUBackup for his backups... I think it was him that mentioned that in another thread.
Yes, I know that. And I know what it does. That is why I said I was confident that he had valid backups and was simply having an issue understanding or expressing.
-
@JaredBusch I must have missed a sentence... or post, lol... I think it went in one eye and out the other.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
In xenserver, when I create a snapshot of my VM's they can be used as a complete restore. I export these off-host, and they are now "backups". They are intact backups that I can use at any time to recover a vm at any point in time.
You are confusing the snapshot with the resulting exported image. The snapshot is a delta and useless. When you export it the system combines the original with the delta to make a useful image. While on the machine the snapshots are not full images on their own.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
@coliver So then it would be smart to regularly merge the Hyper-V snapshots to free up space on your server.
And that seems really odd IMO. . .
Correct, keeping lots of deltas cannot be done without wasting space. It's just impossible not to. Simple physics - two versions of a file take more space than one version.
Should not seem odd at all. What makes it odd? Seems totally obvious. How could snapshots not take up some space?
-
@dafyre said:
@JaredBusch He's using NAUBackup for his backups... I think it was him that mentioned that in another thread.
He did, that is what he is using.
-
It just seems odd how the system keeps the old snapshots. I wasn't aware that is uses each to look for the delta change.
The fact that it takes space is obvious.
A miscommunication on my part I guess. -
@DustinB3403 said:
It just seems odd how the system keeps the old snapshots. I wasn't aware that is uses each to look for the delta change.
Oh okay, well presumably it keeps them so that you have lots of points to roll back to.
-
@scottalanmiller I think of Snapshots as a quick point-in-time view... if something breaks, I can restore that snapshot in mere seconds, and I'm good to go.
If I have to pull a full image from a backup, it could take minutes - hours to restore that backup...
